Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of strain elastography and shear wave elastography in diagnosis of fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

  • Original Article–Gastroenterology
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To reveal the ability of S-Map strain elastography to diagnose fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and to compare its diagnostic ability with that of shear wave elastography (SWE).

Methods

Participants were patients with NAFLD who were scheduled to undergo liver biopsy at our institution between 2015 and 2019. A GE Healthcare LOGIQ E9 ultrasound system was used. For S-Map, the right lobe of the liver was visualized in the section where the heartbeat was detected by right intercostal scanning, a 4 × 2-cm region of interest (ROI) was defined at 5 cm from the liver surface, and ROI strain images were acquired. Measurements were repeated six times, with the average taken as the S-Map value. Correlations of S-Map and SWE values with fibrosis stage determined by liver biopsy were analyzed using multiple comparisons. The diagnostic performance of S-Map for fibrosis staging was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results

In total, 107 patients (65 men, 42 women; mean age 51 ± 14 years) were analyzed. The S-Map value by fibrosis stage was 34.4 ± 10.9 for F0, 32.9 ± 9.1 for F1, 29.5 ± 5.6 for F2, 26.7 ± 6.0 for F3, and 22.8 ± 4.19 for F4. By fibrosis stage, the SWE value was 1.27 ± 0.25 for F0, 1.39 ± 0.20 for F1, 1.59 ± 0.20 for F2, 1.64 ± 0.17 for F3, and 1.88 ± 0.19 for F4. The diagnostic performance of S-Map (measured by area under the curve) was 0.75 for F2, 0.80 for F3, and 0.85 for F4. The diagnostic performance of SWE (measured by area under the curve) was 0.88 for F2, 0.87 for F3, and 0.92 for F4.

Conclusion

S-Map strain elastography was inferior to SWE in terms of ability to diagnose fibrosis in NAFLD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Management of hepatitis C 2002 (June 10–12, 2002). Gastroenterology. 2002;123:2082–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Castera L. Noninvasive methods to assess liver disease in patients with hepatitis B or C. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1293–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cadranel JF. Good clinical practice guidelines for fine needle aspiration biopsy of the liver: past, present and future. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2002;26:823–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wakui N, Takayama R, Kanekawa T, et al. Usefulness of arrival time parametric imaging in evaluating the degree of liver disease progression in chronic hepatitis C infection. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:373–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wakui N, Nagai H, Yoshimine N, et al. Flash imaging used in the post-vascular phase of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is useful for assessing the progression in patients with hepatitis C virus-related liver disease. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45:1654–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mariappan YK, Giaser KJ, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography: a review. Clin Anat. 2010;23:497–511.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Review of MR elastography applications and recent developments. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36:757–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Igarashi H, Shigiyama F, Wakui N, et al. Whole hepatic lipid volume quantification and color mapping by multi-slice and multi-point magnetic resonance imaging. Hepatol Res. 2019;49:1374–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong VS, Hughes V, Trull A, et al. Serum hyaluronic acid is a useful marker of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Viral Hepat. 1998;5:187–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rockey DC, Bissel DM. Noninvasive measures of liver fibrosis. Hepatology. 2006;43:113–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamada N, Sanada Y, Tashiro M, et al. Serum Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer predicts grade F4 liver fibrosis in patients with biliary atresia. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:245–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;8:518–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vallet-Pichard A, Mallet V, Nalpas B, et al. FIB-4: an inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection. Comparison with liver biopsy and fibrotest. Hepatology. 2007;46:32–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferraioli G, Filice C, Castera L, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 3: liver. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:1161–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kudo M, Shiina T, Moriyasu F, et al. JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: liver. J Med Ultrason. 2013;40:325–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American association for the study of liver disease. Hepatology. 2018;67:328–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abe T, Kuroda H, Fujiwara Y, et al. Accuracy of 2D shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Clin Ultrasound. 2018;46:319–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:1413–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Petta S, Muratore C, Craxi A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease pathogenesis: the present and the future. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:615–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam-Larsen S, et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes off patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:389-97.e10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hagström H, Nasr P, Ekstedt M, et al. Fibrosis stage but not NASH predicts mortality and time to development of severe liver disease in biopsy-proven NAFLD. J Hepatol. 2017;67:1265–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Estes C, Anstee QM, Arias-Loste MT, et al. Modeling NAFLD disease burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016–2030. J Hepatol. 2018;69:896–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoneda M, Thomas E, Sclair SN, et al. Supersonic shear imaging and transient elastography with the XL probe accurately detect fibrosis in overweight or obese patients with chronic liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1502-9.e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gaia S, Carenzi S, Barilli AL, et al. Reliability of transient elastography for the detection of fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic viral hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2011;54:64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Petta S, Di Marco V, Cammà C, et al. Reliability of liver stiffness measurement in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the effects of body mass index. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33:1350–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wong VWS, Vergniol J, Wong GLH, et al. Diagnosis of fibrosis and cirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;51:454–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoneda M, Yoneda M, Mawatari H, et al. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40:371–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Orlacchio A, Bolacchi F, Antonicoli M, et al. Liver elasticity in NASH patients evaluated with Real-time elastography (RTE). Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:537–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ochi H, Hirooka M, Koizumi Y, et al. Real-time tissue elastography for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension in nonalcoholic fatty liver fibrosis. Hepatology. 2012;56:1271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cassinotto C, Boursier J, de Lédinghen V, et al. Liver stiffness in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a comparison of supersonic shear imaging, FibroScan, and ARFI with liver biopsy. Hepatology. 2016;63:1817–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Furlan A, Tublin ME, Yu L, et al. Comparison of 2D shear wave elastography, transient elastography, and MR elastography for the diagnosis of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214:W20–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Shunichirou Tanigawa, Takuma Oguri, and Naohisa Kamiyama for providing advice on the S-Map strain elastography technique.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noritaka Wakui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

YO, NW, HN, and TM declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Toho University Omori Medical Center.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogino, Y., Wakui, N., Nagai, H. et al. Comparison of strain elastography and shear wave elastography in diagnosis of fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Med Ultrasonics 50, 187–195 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-023-01293-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-023-01293-z

Keywords

Navigation