Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hypertensive disorders and maternal hemodynamic changes in pregnancy: monitoring by USCOM® device

  • Review Article–Obstetrics & Gynecology
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypertensive disorders are quite common, complicating about 10% of pregnancies, while preeclampsia occurs in 2–8% of cases. The most recognized etiopathogenetic factor for the development of preeclampsia is deficient remodeling of the spiral arteries during trophoblastic invasion. Recently, some authors speculated about the “cardiovascular origin of preeclampsia”; in particular, they postulate that placental dysfunction is not the primum movens of preeclampsia, but it could be caused by a failure of the maternal cardiovascular system to adapt to the pregnancy itself. Moreover, several studies have also shown that developing preeclampsia in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease later in life. Due to the importance of this pathology, it would be crucial to have an effective screening in order to implement a prophylaxis; for this purpose, it could be useful to have an accurate and noninvasive device for the assessment of maternal hemodynamic variables. USCOM® (Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor) is a noninvasive Doppler ultrasonic technology which combines accuracy, reproducibility, noninvasiveness, and a fast learning curve. Maternal hemodynamic evaluation is important in order to monitor the changes that the maternal organism encounters, in particular a reduction in blood pressure, a decrease in total peripheral resistances, and an increase in cardiac output, resulting in a hyperdynamic circle. These hemodynamic modifications are lacking in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. For these reasons, it is crucial to have a tool that allows these parameters to be easily evaluated in order to identify those women at higher risk of hypertensive complications and more severe outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis, and management recommendations for international practice. Hypertension. 2018;72:24–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huppertz B. Placental origins of preeclampsia: challenging the current hypothesis. Hypertension. 2008;51:970–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Redman CWG, Staff AC, Roberts JM. Syncytiotrophoblast stress in preeclampsia: the convergence point for multiple pathways. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;226:S907–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Staff AC, Fjeldstad HE, Fosheim IK, et al. Failure of physiological transformation and spiral artery atherosis: their roles in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;226:S895–906.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Karumanchi SA, Maynard SE, Stillman IE, et al. Preeclampsia: a renal perspective. Kidney Int. 2005;67:2101–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Powe CE, Levine RJ, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia, a disease of the maternal endothelium: the role of antiangiogenic factors and implications for later cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2011;123:2856–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Gorman N, Nicolaides KH, Poon LC. The use of ultrasound and other markers for early detection of preeclampsia. Womens Health (Lond). 2016;12:199–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalafat E, Thilaganathan B. Cardiovascular origins of preeclampsia. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29:383–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Melchiorre K, Giorgione V, Thilaganathan B. The placenta and preeclampsia: villain or victim? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;226:S954–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lovgren TR, Dugoff L, Galan HL. Uterine artery Doppler and prediction of preeclampsia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53:888–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. First-trimester maternal factors and biomarker screening for preeclampsia. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:618–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Verlohren S, Perschel FH, Thilaganathan B, et al. Angiogenic markers and cardiovascular indices in the prediction of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Hypertension. 2017;69:1192–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Melchiorre K, Wormald B, Leslie K, et al. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices in term and preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:133–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sotiriadis A, Hernandez-Andrade E, da Silva CF, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:7–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roberge S, Bujold E, Nicolaides KH. Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:287-93.e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:613–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LCY, et al. ASPRE trial: performance of screening for preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50:492–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McDonald SD, Malinowski A, Zhou Q, et al. Cardiovascular sequelae of preeclampsia/eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Am Heart J. 2008;156:918–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sibai BM, el-Nazer A, Gonzalez-Ruiz A. Severe preeclampsia-eclampsia in young primigravid women: subsequent pregnancy outcome and remote prognosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155:1011–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Melchiorre K, Sharma R, Khalil A, et al. Maternal cardiovascular function in normal pregnancy: evidence of maladaptation to chronic volume overload. Hypertension. 2016;67:754–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Melchiorre K, Sharma R, Thilaganathan B. Cardiac structure and function in normal pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24:413–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Melchiorre K, Sharma R, Thilaganathan B. Cardiovascular implications in preeclampsia: an overview. Circulation. 2014;130:703–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Melchiorre K, Sutherland GR, Baltabaeva A, et al. Maternal cardiac dysfunction and remodeling in women with preeclampsia at term. Hypertension. 2011;57:85–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Melchiorre K, Thilaganathan B. Maternal cardiac function in preeclampsia. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23:440–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghi T, Degli Esposti D, Montaguti E, et al. Post-partum evaluation of maternal cardiac function after severe preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:696–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Melchiorre K, Sutherland GR, Liberati M, et al. Preeclampsia is associated with persistent postpartum cardiovascular impairment. Hypertension. 2011;58:709–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mulder E, Basit S, Oben J, et al. Accuracy and precision of USCOM versus transthoracic echocardiography before and during pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019;17:138–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheng YW, Xu F, Li J. Identification of volume parameters monitored with a noninvasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness in children after congenital heart disease surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97: e12289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Deep A, Goonasekera CD, Wang Y, et al. Evolution of haemodynamics and outcome of fluid-refractory septic shock in children. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1602–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hodgson LE, Venn R, Forni LG, et al. Measuring the cardiac output in acute emergency admissions: use of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with determination of the learning curve and inter-rater reliability. J Intensive Care Soc. 2016;17:122–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zheng ML, He SR, Liu YM, et al. Measurement of inotropy and systemic oxygen delivery in term, low- and very-low-birth-weight neonates using the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM). J Perinat Med. 2020;48:289–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vinayagam D, Thilaganathan B, Stirrup O, et al. Maternal hemodynamics in normal pregnancy: reference ranges and role of maternal characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:665–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vasapollo B, Novelli GP, Valensise H. Total vascular resistance and left ventricular morphology as screening tools for complications in pregnancy. Hypertension. 2008;51:1020–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tiralongo GM, Lo Presti D, Pisani I, et al. Assessment of total vascular resistance and total body water in normotensive women during the first trimester of pregnancy. A key for the prevention of preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2015;5:193–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gagliardi G, Tiralongo GM, LoPresti D, et al. Screening for pre-eclampsia in the first trimester: role of maternal hemodynamics and bioimpedance in non-obese patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50:584–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Montaguti E, Youssef A, Cavalera M, et al. Maternal hemodynamic assessment by USCOM(®) device in the first trimester of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1887129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Montaguti E, Di Donna G, Pilu G. 2021 Usefulness of USCOM® evaluation in women with chronic hypertension who developed severe preeclampsia with low platelets and elevated liver enzymes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1873269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Valensise H, Farsetti D, Pisani I, et al. (2020) Hemodynamic maladaptation and left ventricular dysfunction in chronic hypertensive patients at the beginning of gestation and pregnancy complications: a case control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1818206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vasapollo B, Novelli GP, Gagliardi G, et al. Pregnancy complications in chronic hypertensive patients are linked to pre-pregnancy maternal cardiac function and structure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Di Pasquo E, Ghi T, Dall’Asta A, et al. Maternal cardiac parameters can help in differentiating the clinical profile of preeclampsia and in predicting progression from mild to severe forms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221:633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ferrazzi E, Stampalija T, Monasta L, et al. Maternal hemodynamics: a method to classify hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Foo FL, Mahendru AA, Masini G, et al. Association between prepregnancy cardiovascular function and subsequent preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction. Hypertension. 2018;72:442–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Di Pasquo E, Ghi T, Dall’Asta A, et al. Hemodynamic findings in normotensive women with small-for-gestational-age and growth-restricted fetuses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;100:876–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Valensise H, Farsetti D, Lo Presti D, et al. Preterm delivery and elevated maternal total vascular resistance: signs of suboptimal cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:491–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kalafat E, Barratt I, Nawaz A, et al. Maternal cardiovascular function and risk of intrapartum fetal compromise in women undergoing induction of labor: pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56:233–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Valensise H, Lo Presti D, Tiralongo GM, et al. Foetal heart rate deceleration with combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labour: a maternal haemodynamic cardiac study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:1980–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Valensise H, Tiralongo GM, Pisani I, et al. Maternal hemodynamics early in labor: a possible link with obstetric risk? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:509–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors report no acknowledgements.

Funding

There is no funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy

    Elisa Montaguti, Gaetana Di Donna, Aly Youssef & Gianluigi Pilu

Authors
  1. Elisa Montaguti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gaetana Di Donna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aly Youssef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gianluigi Pilu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EM devised the topic, did literature search, and drafted and wrote the paper. GDD participated in writing, literature searching, and arranging of the references. AY provided expertise and participated in writing and editing of the text. GP participated in writing and editing of the text. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Montaguti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Given the nature of the review article, no ethical committee approval was required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montaguti, E., Di Donna, G., Youssef, A. et al. Hypertensive disorders and maternal hemodynamic changes in pregnancy: monitoring by USCOM® device. J Med Ultrasonics 49, 405–413 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-022-01225-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-022-01225-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation