Skip to main content
Log in

Displacement detection with sub-pixel accuracy and high spatial resolution using deep learning

  • Original Article—Physics & Engineering
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to detect two dimensional and sub-pixel displacement with high spatial resolution using an ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus. Conventional displacement detection methods assume neighborhood uniformity and cannot achieve both high spatial resolution and sub-pixel displacement detection.

Methods

A deep-learning network that utilizes ultrasound images and output displacement distribution was developed. The network structure was constructed by modifying FlowNet2, a widely used network for optical flow estimation, and a training dataset was developed using ultrasound image simulation. Detection accuracy and spatial resolution were evaluated via simulated ultrasound images, and the clinical usefulness was evaluated with ultrasound images of the liver exposed to high-intensity-focused ultrasound (HIFU). These results were compared to the Lucas–Kanade method, a conventional sub-pixel displacement detection method.

Results

For a displacement within ± 40 µm (± 0.6 pixels), a pixel size of 67 µm, and signal noise of 1%, the accuracy was above 0.5 µm and 0.2 µm, the precision was above 0.4 µm and 0.3 µm, and the spatial resolution was 1.1 mm and 0.8 mm for the lateral and axial displacements, respectively. These improvements were also observed in the experimental data. Visualization of the lateral displacement distribution, which determines the edge of the treated lesion using HIFU, was also realized.

Conclusion

Two-dimensional and sub-pixel displacement detection with high spatial resolution was realized using a deep-learning methodology. The proposed method enabled the monitoring of small and local tissue deformations induced by HIFU exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Szabo T. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging: inside out. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lucas BD, Kanade T. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. Proceedings of imaging understanding workshop. 1981;121–30

  3. Yoshikawa H, Yoshizawa S, Umemura S, et al. Ultrasound sub-pixel motion-tracking method with out-of-plane motion detection for precise vascular imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoshikawa H. Study on precise vascular imaging with ultrasound speckle tracking. Doctral dissertation, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. 2017, p. 143. Accessed 1st Mar 2021. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10097/00125122.

  5. Kanai H, Sato M, Chubachi N, et al. Transcutaneous measurement and spectrum analysis of heart wall vibrations. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1996;43:791–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shiina T, Nitta N, Bamber JC, et al. Real time tissue elasticity imaging using the combined autocorrelation method. J Med Ultrason. 2002;29:119–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodfellow I, Gengio Y, Courville A. Deep learning. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Evan E, Faraz K, Grenier T, Garcia D, et al. A pilot study on convolutional neural networks for motion estimation from ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020;67:2565–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao C, Li Z, Lu J, et al. A new deep learning method for displacement tracking from ultrasound RF signals of vascular walls. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tehrani AKZ, Rivaz H. Displacement estimation in ultrasound elastography using pyramidal convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020;67:2629–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peng B, Xian Y, Jiang J. A convolution neural network-based speckle tracking method for ultrasound elastography. IEEE Int Ultrason Symp (IUS). 2018; Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2018.8580034

  12. Kibria MG, Rivaz H. Global ultrasound elastography using convolutional neural network. 2018, p. 4. Accessed on 1 Mar 2021. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.07493.pdf

  13. Gao A, Wu S, Liu Z, et al. Learning the implicit strain reconstruction in ultrasound elastography using privileged information. Med Image Anal. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.101534.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu S, Gao Z, Lui J et al. Direct reconstruction of ultrasound elastography using an end-to-end deep neural network. International conference on medical image computing and computer assisted intervention (MICCAI). 2018;374–82

  15. Ilg E, Mayer N, Saikia T et al. FlowNet2.0: evolution of optical flow estimation with deep networks. 2016, p.16. Accessed on 1 Mar 2021. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.01925.pdf

  16. Sum D, Yang X, Liu MY et al. PWC-Net: CNNs for optical flow using pyramid, warping, and cost volume. 2018, p. 18. Accessed on 1 Mar 2021. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.02371.pdf

  17. Jensen JA. Field: a program for simulating ultrasound systems. The 10th Nordic-Baltic conference on biomedical imaging published in medical and biological engineering and computing. 1996;34:351–3

  18. Giomore GR. Practival gamma-ray spectrometry. New York: Wiley; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamamoto M, Yoshizawa S. Analysis of tissue displacement induced by high-intensity focused ultrasound exposure for coagulation monitoring. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2021;60:040903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Montaldo G, Tanter M, Bercoff J, et al. Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56:489–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sasaki S, Takagi R, Matsuura K, et al. Feasibility of real-time treatment feedback using novel filter for eliminating therapeutic ultrasound noise with high-speed ultrasonic imaging in ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2014;53:07KF10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Berson M, Roncin A, Pourcelot L. Compound scanning with an electrically steered beam. Ultrason Imaging. 1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/016173468100300306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Luo J, Chen CW, et al. Artifact reduction in low bit rate DCT-based image compression. IEEE Trans Image Proc. 1996;9:1363–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariko Yamamoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The samples used in this study were obtained via commercial distribution and were not associated with animal experiments.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamamoto, M., Yoshizawa, S. Displacement detection with sub-pixel accuracy and high spatial resolution using deep learning. J Med Ultrasonics 49, 3–15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01162-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01162-7

Keywords

Navigation