Skip to main content
Log in

Value of ultrasound scoring system for assessing risk of pernicious placenta previa with accreta spectrum disorders and poor pregnancy outcomes

  • Original Article–Obstetrics & Gynecology
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate a system for assessing the risk of pernicious placenta previa (PPP) with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders and poor pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

This prospective study focused on PPP women at ≥ 28 weeks’ pregnancy. Transabdominal or transvaginal ultrasonography was used to assess PAS and poor pregnancy outcomes with a system involving uteroplacental demarcation, number and size of lacunae, bladder line, and placental basal and lacunae flow. Every item was assigned 0–2 points, and the sum yielded the final score. Diagnosis of PAS was based on surgery or pathology. One or more of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) ≥ 1000 ml, hysterectomy, and organ invasion were regarded as a poor pregnancy outcome. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated.

Results

Fifty-one PPP women were included, with 70.6% having PAS and 75.0% of PAS women having a poor pregnancy outcome. The incidence of PAS diagnosis was 36.4% for those with a score < 5 points, with 0% having a poor outcome; 76.5% for those with a score ≥ 5 to < 8 points, with 61.5% having a poor outcome; and 100% for those with a score ≥ 8 points, with 100% having a poor pregnancy outcome.

Conclusion

The system for predicting PPP with PAS and poor pregnancy outcomes was of high accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jauniaux E, Ayres-de-Campos D. FIGO placenta accreta diagnosis and management expert consensus panel FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Introduction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140:261–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jauniaux E, Silver RM, Matsubara S. The new world of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140:259–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D. Placenta accreta: pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease. Placenta. 2012;33:244–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chattopadhyay SK, Kharif H, Sherbeeni MM. Placenta praevia and accreta after previous caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993;52:151–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1226–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jauniaux E, Collins S, Burton GJ. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bulletins-Obstetrics COP. Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:168–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen T. Placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy: overlooked costs of the rising cesarean section rate. Clin Pernatal. 2008;35:519–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilboa Y, Spira M, Mazaki-Tovi S, et al. A novel sonographic scoring system for antenatal risk assessment of obstetric complications in suspected morbidly adherent placenta. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34:561–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tovbin J, Melcer Y, Shor S, et al. Prediction of morbidly adherent placenta using a scoring system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:504–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wong HS, Cheung YK, Strand L, et al. Specific sonographic features of placenta accreta: tissue interface disruption on gray-scale imaging and evidence of vessels crossing interface-disruption sites on Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:239–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong HS, Cheung YK, Zucollo J, et al. Evaluation of sonographic diagnostic criteria for placenta accreta. J Clin Ultrasound. 2008;36:551–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Finberg HJ, Williams JW. Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section. J Ultrasound Med. 1992;11:333–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rac MW, Dashe JS, Wells CE, et al. Ultrasound predictors of placental invasion: the Placenta Accreta Index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamaguchi M, Hyuga T, Yoshida K, et al. A case–control study of risk factors for placenta previa accreta [abstract]. J Reprod Immunol. 2016;118:122–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cali G, Forlani F, Timor-Trisch I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the depth of invasion in women at risk of abnormally invasive placenta: a prospective longitudinal study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97:1219–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1458–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Serehi A, Mhoyan A, Brown M, et al. Placenta accreta: an association with fibroids and Asherman syndrome. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:1623–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehrabadi A, Hutcheon JA, Liu S, et al. Contribution of placenta accreta to the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and severe postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:814–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonnar J. Massive obstetric haemorrhage. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14:1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weiniger CF, Einav S, Deutsch L, et al. Outcomes of prospectively-collected consecutive cases of antenatal-suspected placenta accreta. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013;22:273–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang J, Li H, Wang F, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of abnormal invasive placenta by ultrasound: measurement of highest peak systolic velocity of subplacental blood flow. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018;44:1672–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Muramatsu K, Itoh H, Yamasaki T, et al. A case of a huge placental lake; prenatal differential diagnosis and clinical management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36:165–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jauniaux E, Campbell S. Ultrasonographic assessment of placental abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:1650–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Garmi G, Salim R. Epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and management of placenta accreta. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;2012:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang JI, Lim YK, Kim HS, et al. Sonographic findings of placental lacunae and the prediction of adherent placenta in women with placenta previa totalis and prior Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:178–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cali G, Giambanco L, Puccio G, et al. Morbidly adherent placenta: evaluation of ultrasound diagnostic criteria and differentiation of placenta accreta from percreta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:406–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chou MM, Ho ESC, Lee YH. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta previa accreta by transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15:28–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fan M, Mootabar H. A rare giant placental chorioangioma with favorable outcome: a case report and review of the literature. J Clin Ultrasound. 2014;43:254–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D’Antonio F, Bhide A. Ultrasound in placental disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet. 2014;28:429–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Crane JMG, Mc VDH, Dodds L, et al. Maternal complications with placenta previa. Am J Perinatol. 2000;17:101–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Matsubara S. Bladder-opening technique for hysterectomy for placenta previa percreta. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283:1427–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alghrouz A, Tran S, Shah S. Cystoscopic findings of placenta percreta with bladder involvement. J Urol. 2016;195:e182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Diop AN, Bros S, Chabrot P, et al. Placenta percreta: urologic complication after successful conservative management by uterine arterial embolization: a case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:e7–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the help received from Dr. Taotao Song and Dr. Hui Sun as they provided valuable clinical data in preparing this original article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Limei Xie.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.

Conflict of interest

Lingling Zhu and Limei Xie declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Xie, L. Value of ultrasound scoring system for assessing risk of pernicious placenta previa with accreta spectrum disorders and poor pregnancy outcomes. J Med Ultrasonics 46, 481–487 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-019-00965-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-019-00965-z

Keywords

Navigation