Skip to main content
Log in

Color Doppler ultrasonography is a reliable diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of extracranial vertebral artery dissections

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of color Doppler sonography (CDS) in the diagnosis of extracranial vertebral artery dissections (EVADs). One hundred and fifty consecutive patients (age range 21–51 years, mean 44 years) with a clinical suspicion of vertebral artery dissection (VAD) were included in this study. All patients underwent CDS of vertebral arteries as the first-line imaging modality. Cervical T1-weighted fat-saturated axial MR images served as the gold standard. Of the 150 patients with a clinical suspicion of VAD, 27 patients were ultimately diagnosed with EVADs based on fat-saturated T1-weighted MR imaging. MR imaging was considered positive when crescentic hyperintensity (methemoglobin signal) was demonstrated at the wall of the vertebral artery. CDS was positive in 21 of these 27 patients and revealed either intramural hematoma or a dissecting membrane with two lumina. The most frequent site of involvement was the V1 to proximal V2 segment. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CDS in the diagnosis of EVADs were 77.8, 98.4, 91.3, and 95.3%, respectively. CDS is a reliable diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of EVADs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gottesman RF, Sharma P, Robinson KA, et al. Clinical characteristics of symptomatic vertebral artery dissection. A Systematic Review. Neurologist. 2012;18:245–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vertinsky AT, Schwartz NE, Fischbein NJ, et al. Comparasion of multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging of cervical artery dissection. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1753–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu JC, Sun Y, Jeng JS, et al. Imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up evaluation of vertebral artery dissection. J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19:263–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartels E, Flügel KA. Evaluation of extracranial vertebral artery dissection with duplex color-flow imaging. Stroke. 1996;27:290–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang L, Ran H. Extracranial vertebral artery dissection: findings and advantages of ultrasonography. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e0067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodallec MH, Marteau V, Gerber S, et al. Craniocervical arterial dissection: spectrum of imaging findings and differential diagnosis. RadioGraphics. 2008;28:1711–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Flis CM, Jäger HR, Sidhu PS. Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: clinical aspects, imaging features and endovascular treatment. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:820–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pugliese F, Crusco F, Cardaioli G, et al. CT ahgiography versus colour-Doppler US in acute dissection of the vertebral artery. Radiol. Med. 2007;112:435–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wessels T, Mosso M, Krings T, et al. Extracranial and intracranial vertebral artery dissection: long term clinical and duplex sonographic follow-up. J Clin Ultrasound. 2008;36:472–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gottesman RF, Sharma P, Robinson KA, et al. Imaging characteristics of symptomatic vertebral artery dissection. Neurologist. 2012;18:255–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Siepmann T, Borchert M, Barlinn K. Vertebral artery dissection with compelling evidence on duplex ultrasound presenting only with neck pain. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;1:2839–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gottesman RF, Sharma P, Robinson KA, et al. Imaging characteristics of symptomatic vertebral artery dissection. Neurologist. 2012;18:255–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Provenzale JM. MRI and MRA for evaluation of dissection of craniocerebral arteries: lessons from the medical literature. Emerg Radiol. 2009;16:185–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Siepmann T, Borchert M, Barlinn K. Vertebral artery dissection with compelling evidence on duplex ultrasound presenting only with neck pain. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;1:2839–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayse Selcan Koc.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests or sources of funding.

Ethical statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from patients for being included in the study.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yılmaz, C., Gorgulu, F.F., Oksuzler, F.Y. et al. Color Doppler ultrasonography is a reliable diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of extracranial vertebral artery dissections. J Med Ultrasonics 46, 153–158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-018-0901-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-018-0901-2

Keywords

Navigation