Improvement of penetration of modified amplitude and phase estimation beamformer

Abstract

Purpose

High-frame-rate ultrasound is the predominant technique for the measurement of tissue dynamics. It enables an imaging frame rate of over 1 kHz using unfocused transmit beams and parallel receive beamforming. On the other hand, the spatial resolution is degraded compared to the conventional method based on sequential transmissions of focused beams. For improvement of the spatial resolution of high-frame-rate ultrasound, we have investigated a kind of adaptive beamformer, i.e., amplitude and phase estimation (APES) beamformer.

Method

In our previous study, it was shown that the APES beamformer realized a significantly better spatial resolution than the conventional delay and sum (DAS) beamformer without sub-array averaging and diagonal loading by considering the directivity of each transducer element. By omitting sub-array averaging and adding sub-aperture beamforming, the computational load could also be reduced significantly. One shortcoming of the proposed APES beamformer with element directivity, i.e., modified APES beamformer, is the degradation of penetration compared with the conventional APES beamformer with sub-array averaging and diagonal loading. In the present study, sub-array averaging and diagonal loading were applied to the modified APES beamformer for the improvement of the penetration.

Results

The conventional and modified APES beamformers realized similar performances when used with sub-array averaging and diagonal loading. Furthermore, the modified APES beamformer realized better spatial resolution and improved penetration when used with sub-aperture beamforming and diagonal loading. The modified APES beamformer with diagonal loading at 0.025 of the received power realized a penetration similar to that of the conventional APES beamformer with sub-array averaging and diagonal loading. The lateral spatial resolutions achieved with the conventional and modified APES beamformers were 0.36 and 0.31 mm, respectively. In addition, the modified APES beamformer could reduce the dimension of the covariance matrix to \(4\times 4\), versus \(48\times 48\) of the conventional APES beamformer, resulting in a computation time of only 1.1 %.

Conclusion

Penetration of the modified APES beamformer could be improved significantly by diagonal loading, which hardly increases the computational complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. 1.

    Shattuck DP, Weinshenker MD, Smith SW, von Ramm OT. Explososcan: a parallel processing technique for high speed ultrasound imaging with linear phased arrays. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;75:1273–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tanter M, Bercoff J, Sandrin L, Fink M. Ultrafast compound imaging for 2-D motion vector estimation: application to transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2002;49:1363–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hasegawa H, Kanai H. Simultaneous imaging of artery-wall strain and blood flow by high frame rate acquisition of RF signals. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008;55:2626–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Honjo Y, Hasegawa H, Kanai H. Two-dimensional tracking of heart wall for detailed analysis of heart function at high temporal and spatial resolutions. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2010;49:07HF14.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Provost J, Gambhir A, Vest J, Garan H, Konofagou EE. A clinical feasibility study of atrial and ventricular electromechanical wave imaging. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:856–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Shahmirzadi D, Li RX, Konofagou EE. Pulse-wave propagation in straight-geometry vessels for stiffness estimation: theory, simulations, phantoms and in vitro findings. J Biomech Eng. 2012;134:114502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hasegawa H, Hongo K, Kanai H. Measurement of regional pulse wave velocity using very high frame rate ultrasound. J Med Ultrason. 2013;40:91–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bercoff J, Montaldo G, Loupas T, Savery D, Mézière F, Fink M, Tanter M. Ultrafast compound Doppler imaging: providing full blood flow characterization. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011;58:134–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yiu BY, Yu AC. High-frame-rate ultrasound color-encoded speckle imaging of complex flow dynamics. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:1015–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Takahashi H, Hasegawa H, Kanai H. Echo speckle imaging of blood particles with high-frame-rate echocardiography. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2014;53:07KF08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jespersen SK, Wilhjelm JE, Sillesen H. Multi-angle compound imaging. Ultrason Imaging. 1998;20:81–102.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Montaldo G, Tanter M, Bercoff J, Benech N, Fink M. Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56:489–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hasegawa H, Kanai H. High-frame-rate echocardiography using diverging transmit beams and parallel receive beamforming. J Med Ultrason. 2011;38:129–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Papadacci C, Pernot M, Couade M, Fink M, Tanter M. High-contrast ultrafast imaging of the heart. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014;61:288–301.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Capon J. High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis. Proc IEEE. 1969;57:1408–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Synnevåg JF, Austeng A, Holm S. Adaptive beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007;54:1606–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Holfort IK, Gran F, Jensen JA. Broadband minimum variance beamforming for ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56:314–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Synnevåg JF, Austeng A, Holm S. Benefits of minimum-variance beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56:1868–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Synnevåg JF, Nilsen CI, Holm S. Speckle statistics in adaptive beamforming. Proc IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. 2007, pp. 1545–8.

  20. 20.

    Blomberg AEA, Holfort IK, Austeng A, Synnevåg JF, Holm S, Jensen JA. APES beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging. 2009 IEEE Intern’l Ultrason Symp Proc. pp 2347–50.

  21. 21.

    Hasegawa H, Kanai H. Effect of element directivity on adaptive beamforming applied to high-frame-rate ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2015;62:511–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Synnevåg JF, Austeng A, Holm S. A low-complexity data dependent beamformer. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011;58:281–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Asl BM, Mahloojifar A. A low-complexity adaptive beamformer for ultrasound imaging using structured covariance matrix. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012;59:660–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kim K, Park S, Kim J, Park SB, Bae M. A fast minimum variance beamforming method using principal component analysis. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014;61:930–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    van Wijk MC, Thijssen JM. Performance testing of medical ultrasound equipment: fundamental vs. harmonic mode. Ultrasonics. 2002;40:585–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Thijssen JM, Weijers G, de Korte CL. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:460–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Li PC, Li ML. Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2003;50:128–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Camacho J, Parrilla M, Fritsch C. Phase coherence imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56:958–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hasegawa H, Kanai H. Effect of sub-aperture beamforming on phase coherence imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014;61:1779–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hasegawa H. Enhancing effect of phase coherence factor for improvement of spatial resolution in ultrasonic imaging. J Med Ultrason. 2016;43:19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 26289123 and 15K13995.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideyuki Hasegawa.

Ethics declarations

Ethical considerations

Animal and human subjects were not used in this study.

Conflict of interest

None.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasegawa, H. Improvement of penetration of modified amplitude and phase estimation beamformer. J Med Ultrasonics 44, 3–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-016-0731-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Penetration
  • Spatial resolution
  • Adaptive beamforming
  • High-frame-rate ultrasound