Journal of Medical Ultrasonics

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 3–11 | Cite as

Improvement of penetration of modified amplitude and phase estimation beamformer

Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

High-frame-rate ultrasound is the predominant technique for the measurement of tissue dynamics. It enables an imaging frame rate of over 1 kHz using unfocused transmit beams and parallel receive beamforming. On the other hand, the spatial resolution is degraded compared to the conventional method based on sequential transmissions of focused beams. For improvement of the spatial resolution of high-frame-rate ultrasound, we have investigated a kind of adaptive beamformer, i.e., amplitude and phase estimation (APES) beamformer.

Method

In our previous study, it was shown that the APES beamformer realized a significantly better spatial resolution than the conventional delay and sum (DAS) beamformer without sub-array averaging and diagonal loading by considering the directivity of each transducer element. By omitting sub-array averaging and adding sub-aperture beamforming, the computational load could also be reduced significantly. One shortcoming of the proposed APES beamformer with element directivity, i.e., modified APES beamformer, is the degradation of penetration compared with the conventional APES beamformer with sub-array averaging and diagonal loading. In the present study, sub-array averaging and diagonal loading were applied to the modified APES beamformer for the improvement of the penetration.

Results

The conventional and modified APES beamformers realized similar performances when used with sub-array averaging and diagonal loading. Furthermore, the modified APES beamformer realized better spatial resolution and improved penetration when used with sub-aperture beamforming and diagonal loading. The modified APES beamformer with diagonal loading at 0.025 of the received power realized a penetration similar to that of the conventional APES beamformer with sub-array averaging and diagonal loading. The lateral spatial resolutions achieved with the conventional and modified APES beamformers were 0.36 and 0.31 mm, respectively. In addition, the modified APES beamformer could reduce the dimension of the covariance matrix to \(4\times 4\), versus \(48\times 48\) of the conventional APES beamformer, resulting in a computation time of only 1.1 %.

Conclusion

Penetration of the modified APES beamformer could be improved significantly by diagonal loading, which hardly increases the computational complexity.

Keywords

Penetration Spatial resolution Adaptive beamforming High-frame-rate ultrasound 

References

  1. 1.
    Shattuck DP, Weinshenker MD, Smith SW, von Ramm OT. Explososcan: a parallel processing technique for high speed ultrasound imaging with linear phased arrays. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;75:1273–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tanter M, Bercoff J, Sandrin L, Fink M. Ultrafast compound imaging for 2-D motion vector estimation: application to transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2002;49:1363–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hasegawa H, Kanai H. Simultaneous imaging of artery-wall strain and blood flow by high frame rate acquisition of RF signals. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008;55:2626–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Honjo Y, Hasegawa H, Kanai H. Two-dimensional tracking of heart wall for detailed analysis of heart function at high temporal and spatial resolutions. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2010;49:07HF14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Provost J, Gambhir A, Vest J, Garan H, Konofagou EE. A clinical feasibility study of atrial and ventricular electromechanical wave imaging. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:856–62.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shahmirzadi D, Li RX, Konofagou EE. Pulse-wave propagation in straight-geometry vessels for stiffness estimation: theory, simulations, phantoms and in vitro findings. J Biomech Eng. 2012;134:114502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hasegawa H, Hongo K, Kanai H. Measurement of regional pulse wave velocity using very high frame rate ultrasound. J Med Ultrason. 2013;40:91–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bercoff J, Montaldo G, Loupas T, Savery D, Mézière F, Fink M, Tanter M. Ultrafast compound Doppler imaging: providing full blood flow characterization. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011;58:134–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yiu BY, Yu AC. High-frame-rate ultrasound color-encoded speckle imaging of complex flow dynamics. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:1015–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takahashi H, Hasegawa H, Kanai H. Echo speckle imaging of blood particles with high-frame-rate echocardiography. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2014;53:07KF08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jespersen SK, Wilhjelm JE, Sillesen H. Multi-angle compound imaging. Ultrason Imaging. 1998;20:81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Montaldo G, Tanter M, Bercoff J, Benech N, Fink M. Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56:489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hasegawa H, Kanai H. High-frame-rate echocardiography using diverging transmit beams and parallel receive beamforming. J Med Ultrason. 2011;38:129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papadacci C, Pernot M, Couade M, Fink M, Tanter M. High-contrast ultrafast imaging of the heart. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014;61:288–301.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Capon J. High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis. Proc IEEE. 1969;57:1408–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Synnevåg JF, Austeng A, Holm S. Adaptive beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007;54:1606–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holfort IK, Gran F, Jensen JA. Broadband minimum variance beamforming for ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56:314–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Synnevåg JF, Austeng A, Holm S. Benefits of minimum-variance beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56:1868–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Synnevåg JF, Nilsen CI, Holm S. Speckle statistics in adaptive beamforming. Proc IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. 2007, pp. 1545–8.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blomberg AEA, Holfort IK, Austeng A, Synnevåg JF, Holm S, Jensen JA. APES beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging. 2009 IEEE Intern’l Ultrason Symp Proc. pp 2347–50.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hasegawa H, Kanai H. Effect of element directivity on adaptive beamforming applied to high-frame-rate ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2015;62:511–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Synnevåg JF, Austeng A, Holm S. A low-complexity data dependent beamformer. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011;58:281–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Asl BM, Mahloojifar A. A low-complexity adaptive beamformer for ultrasound imaging using structured covariance matrix. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012;59:660–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim K, Park S, Kim J, Park SB, Bae M. A fast minimum variance beamforming method using principal component analysis. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014;61:930–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Wijk MC, Thijssen JM. Performance testing of medical ultrasound equipment: fundamental vs. harmonic mode. Ultrasonics. 2002;40:585–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thijssen JM, Weijers G, de Korte CL. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:460–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li PC, Li ML. Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2003;50:128–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Camacho J, Parrilla M, Fritsch C. Phase coherence imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56:958–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hasegawa H, Kanai H. Effect of sub-aperture beamforming on phase coherence imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014;61:1779–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hasegawa H. Enhancing effect of phase coherence factor for improvement of spatial resolution in ultrasonic imaging. J Med Ultrason. 2016;43:19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Science and EngineeringUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations