Journal of Medical Ultrasonics

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 19–26 | Cite as

Sonographically guided puncture of the pancreas: incidence of complications, and risk factors

  • Michael Mueller
  • Richard Andrew Mason
  • Wolfgang Kratzer
  • Suemeyra Oeztuerk
  • Mark Martin Haenle
Original Article



Data yielded by transabdominal ultrasound-guided puncture techniques are valuable for determining the malignancy of inoperable mass lesions of the pancreas. In this study we analyzed the incidence of complications and the risk factors.


A total of 430 punctures of the pancreas were performed for 281 patients. Risk factors were prospectively assessed and complications were recorded. All punctures were sonographically guided.


The 281 patients underwent a total of 351 puncture procedures including 430 punctures and 901 passes. The maximum diameter of the pancreatic mass lesion was documented; the mean diameter was 48.3 ± 29.1 mm. 75.8 % of punctures were performed with a needle diameter of 0.7–0.95 mm, and 23.0 % of punctures were performed as cutting biopsies producing a tissue sample 1.2 or 1.6 mm in diameter. In 77.8 % of punctures, one puncture was performed, and in 21.9 %, two punctures were performed. Three punctures were performed for one patient (0.3 %) only. The incidence of major complications was 0.3 %. None of the assessed risk factors was associated with an elevated incidence of complications.


Our findings demonstrate the safety of transabdominal percutaneous puncture of the pancreas but do not enable conclusions to be drawn with regard to individual risk factors.


Pancreas Puncture Ultrasonography Complications Biopsy 


  1. 1.
    Winter TC, Lee FT Jr, Hinshaw JL. Ultrasound-guided biopsies in the abdomen and pelvis. Ultrasound Q. 2008;24:45–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ojalehto M, Tikkakoski T, Rissanen T, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous thoracoabdominal biopsy. Acta Radiol. 2002;43:152–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atwell TD, Gorman B, Larson TS, et al. Pancreas transplants: experience with 232 percutaneous US-guided biopsy procedures in 88 patients. Radiology. 2004;231:845–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frieser M, Lindner A, Meyer S, et al. Spectrum and bleeding complications of sonographically guided interventions of the liver and pancreas. Ultraschall Med. 2009;30:168–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hajdu EO, Kumari-Subaiya S, Phillips G. Ultrasonically guided percutaneous aspiration biopsy of the pancreas. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1986;3:166–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klassen DK, Weir MR, Cangro CB, et al. Pancreas allograft biopsy: safety of percutaneous biopsy-results of a large experience. Transplantation. 2002;73:553–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malek SK, Potdar S, Martin JA, et al. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided pancreas allograft biopsy: a single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:4436–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cadranel JF, Rufat P, Degos F. Practices of liver biopsy in France: results of a prospective nationwide survey. For the Group of Epidemiology of the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF). Hepatology. 2000;32:477–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsubara J, Okusaka T, Morizane C, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous pancreatic tumor biopsy in pancreatic cancer: a comparison with metastatic liver tumor biopsy, including sensitivity, specificity, and complications. J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:225–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soudah B, Fritsch RS, Wittekind C, et al. Value of the cytologic analysis of fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinomas. Acta Cytol. 1989;33:875–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Di Stasi M, Lencioni R, Solmi L, et al. Ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses: results of a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1329–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Das DK, Bhambhani S, Kumar N, et al. Ultrasound guided percutaneous fine needle aspiration cytology of pancreas: a review of 61 cases. Trop Gastroenterol. 1995;16:101–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elvin A, Andersson T, Scheibenpflug L, et al. Biopsy of the pancreas with a biopsy gun. Radiology. 1990;176:677–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karlson BM, Forsman CA, Wilander E, et al. Efficiency of percutaneous core biopsy in pancreatic tumor diagnosis. Surgery. 1996;120:75–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Al-Kaisi N, Siegler EE. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the pancreas. Acta Cytol. 1989;33:145–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hall-Craggs MA, Lees WR. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: pancreatic and biliary tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147:399–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pinto MM, Avila NA, Criscuolo EM. Fine needle aspiration of the pancreas. A five-year experience. Acta Cytol. 1988;32:39–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brandt KR, Charboneau JW, Stephens DH, et al. CT- and US-guided biopsy of the pancreas. Radiology. 1993;187:99–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tillou A, Schwartz MR, Jordan PH Jr. Percutaneous needle biopsy of the pancreas: when should it be performed? World J Surg. 1996;20:283–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zech CJ, Helmberger T, Wichmann MW, et al. Large core biopsy of the pancreas under CT fluoroscopy control: results and complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26:743–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Terjung B, Lemnitzer I, Dumoulin FL, et al. Bleeding complications after percutaneous liver biopsy. An analysis of risk factors. Digestion. 2003;67:138–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sporea I, Popescu A, Sirli R. Why, who and how should perform liver biopsy in chronic liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3396–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Froehlich F, Lamy O, Fried M, et al. Practice and complications of liver biopsy. Results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:1480–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thampanitchawong P, Piratvisuth T. Liver biopsy: complications and risk factors. World J Gastroenterol. 1999;5:301–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gunneson TJ, Menon KV, Wiesner RH, et al. Ultrasound-assisted percutaneous liver biopsy performed by a physician assistant. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1472–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chuah SY, Moody GA, Wicks AC, et al. A nationwide survey of liver biopsy—is there a need to increase resources, manpower and training? Hepatogastroenterology. 1994;41:4–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chevallier P, Ruitort F, Denys A, et al. Influence of operator experience on performance of ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:2086–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith EH. Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review. Radiology. 1991;178:253–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ryd W, Hagmar B, Eriksson O. Local tumour cell seeding by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. A semiquantitative study. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand A. 1983;91:17–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fornari F, Civardi G, Cavanna L, et al. Complications of ultrasonically guided fine-needle abdominal biopsy. Results of a multicenter Italian study and review of the literature. The Cooperative Italian Study Group. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1989;24:949–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim SH, Lim HK, Lee WJ, et al. Needle-tract implantation in hepatocellular carcinoma: frequency and CT findings after biopsy with a 19.5-gauge automated biopsy gun. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:246–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Silva MA, Hegab B, Hyde C, et al. Needle track seeding following biopsy of liver lesions in the diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2008;57:1592–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Mueller
    • 1
  • Richard Andrew Mason
    • 2
  • Wolfgang Kratzer
    • 1
  • Suemeyra Oeztuerk
    • 1
  • Mark Martin Haenle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine IUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
  2. 2.Brecksville DivisionLouis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical CenterBrecksvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations