Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental evaluation of portal venous pulsatile flow synchronized with heartbeat intervals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyze pulsatile flow in the portal vein, to clarify the origin of pulsatile flow, and to acquire new knowledge about the hepatic circulation.

Methods

Mini-pigs underwent general anesthesia. Pressure and flow in the portal vein, inferior vena cava, hepatic artery, and mesenteric artery were measured simultaneously. We (1) studied the relationship between changes in pressure and changes in flow and (2) measured heartbeat intervals and the onset times of pressure and flow waves.

Results

In the inferior vena cava, pressure and flow showed mirror-image changes. In the hepatic artery and the mesenteric artery, pressure and flow increased simultaneously. In the inferior vena cava, the longer the heartbeat interval, the more delayed were the onset times of pressure and flow waves. The onset time of pressure and flow waves in the hepatic artery and the mesenteric artery was only minimally affected by changes in heartbeat interval. The relationship between pressure and flow in the portal vein was closer to that in the hepatic artery and the mesenteric artery. However, the onset times of pressure and flow waves in the portal vein showed two different patterns: some showed a pattern similar to that of the inferior vena cava, whereas others showed a pattern similar to that of the hepatic artery and the mesenteric artery.

Conclusions

Blood flow in the portal vein is pulsatile and influenced by both the inferior vena cava and the arterial system in a complex manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moore GE, Bridenbaugh RB. Roentgen demonstration of the venous circulation in the liver: portal venography. Radiology. 1951;57:685–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gates GF, Dore EK. Streamline flow in the human portal vein. J Nucl Med. 1973;14:79–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor KJ, Burns PN, Woodcock JP, et al. Blood flow in deep abdominal and pelvic vessels: ultrasonic pulsed-Doppler analysis. Radiology. 1985;154:487–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Duerinckx AJ, Grant EG, Perrella RR, et al. The pulsatile portal vein in cases of congestive heart failure: correlation of duplex Doppler findings with right atrial pressures. Radiology. 1990;176:655–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hosoki T, Arisawa J, Marukawa T, et al. Portal blood flow in congestive heart failure: pulsed duplex sonographic findings. Radiology. 1990;174:733–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Koslin DB, Mulligan SA, Berland LL. Duplex assessment of the portal venous system. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1992;13:22–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abu-Yousef MM. Normal and respiratory variations of the hepatic and portal venous duplex Doppler waveforms with simultaneous electrocardiographic correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 1992;11:263–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallix BP, Taurel P, Dauzat M, et al. Flow pulsatility in the portal venous system: a study of Doppler sonography in healthy adults. AJR. 1997;169:141–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalmanson D, Veyrat C, Chiche P. Atrial versus ventricular contribution in determining systolic venous return. A new approach to an old riddle. Cardiovasc Res. 1971;5:293–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnes RJ, Comline RS, Dobson A, et al. An implantable transit time ultrasonic blood flow meter. J Physiol. 1983;345:2P–3P.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Doi R, Inoue K, Kogire M, et al. Simultaneous measurement of hepatic arterial and portal venous flows by transit time ultrasonic volume flowmetry. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988;167:65–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhatnagar MK, Shahidi E, Singh A. Histology of piglet liver. Swine in biomedical research, vol 1. New York: Plenum; 1986. p. 759–66.

  13. Ryu JM, Kim DH, Lee MY, et al. Imaging evaluation of the liver using multi-detector row computed tomography in micropigs as potential living liver donors. J Vet Sci. 2009;10:93–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reynolds T, Appleton CP. Doppler flow velocity patterns of the superior vena cava, inferior vena cava, hepatic vein, coronary sinus, and atrial septal defect: a guide for the echocardiographer. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1991;4:503–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Rourke MF, Blazek JV, Morreels CL Jr, et al. Pressure wave transmission along the human aorta. Changes with age and in arterial degenerative disease. Circ Res. 1968;23:567–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abu-Yousef MM, Milam SG, Farner RM. Pulsatile portal vein flow: a sign of tricuspid regurgitation on duplex Doppler sonography. AJR. 1990;155:785–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshito Nihei.

About this article

Cite this article

Nihei, Y., Sasanuma, H. & Yasuda, Y. Experimental evaluation of portal venous pulsatile flow synchronized with heartbeat intervals. J Med Ultrasonics 38, 141–149 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-011-0308-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-011-0308-9

Keywords

Navigation