Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Morphological and functional evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal growth by ultrasonography

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Correction or estimation of gestational age is essential for the evaluation of fetal growth. When necessary, an appropriate fetal biometric parameter should be selected depending on fetal size. In the first trimester, crown–rump length (CRL) is appropriate, especially when the CRL is 20–40 mm. In the second trimester, biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), and femur length (FL) are of equal predictability. Fetal weight estimation is still the basis of evaluation of fetal growth. The most predictable formula currently available includes the parameters BPD (or HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and FL. Serial measurements of AC are useful for diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and macrosomia. Quantitative evaluation of soft tissue deposition may be informative for macrosomia. Functional evaluation using Doppler velocimetry is essential in IUGR cases associated with uteroplacental insufficiency. Analysis of blood velocity waveforms of the umbilical and intracranial arteries, predominantly the middle cerebral artery, is widely performed. An increase in the pulsatility index (PI) or resistance index (RI) of the umbilical artery and/or a decrease in the PI or RI of the middle cerebral artery are highly predictable for fetal hypoxia and/or acidosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Queenan JT, O’Brien GD, Bains LM, Simpson J, Collins WP, Campbell S. Ultrasound scanning of ovaries to detect ovulation in women. Fertil Steril. 1980;34:99–105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P, During VV, Kahn JA. Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval. Crown–rump length and biparietal diameter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15:41–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson HP. Sonar measurement of fetal crown–rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy. Br Med J. 1973;4:28–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson HP, Fleming JEE. A critical evaluation of sonar ‘crown–rump length’ measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975;82:702–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pedersen JF. Fetal crown–rump length measurement by ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982;89:926–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadlock FP, Shah YP, Kanon DJ, Lindsey JV. Fetal crown–rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5–18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. Radiology. 1992;182:501–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuhn P, Brizot ML, Pandya PP, Snijders RJ, Nicolaides KH. Crown–rump length in chromosomally abnormal fetuses at 10 to 13 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:32–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pedersen JF, Molsted-Pedersen L. Early fetal growth delay detected by ultrasound marks increased risk of congenital malformation in diabetic pregnancy. Br Med J. 1981;283:269–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Benson CB, Doubilet PM. Sonographic prediction of gestational age: accuracy of second- and third-trimester fetal measurements. AJR. 1991;157:1275–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell S, Wilkin D. Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdomen circumference in the estimation of fetal weight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975;82:689–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurjak A, Kirkinen P, Latin V. Biometric and dynamic ultrasound assessment of small-for-dates infants: Report of 260 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;56:281–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Warsof SL, Gohari P, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC. The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;128:881–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, Warsof SL, Hobbins JC. An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;142:47–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements–a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nahum GG, Stanislaw H. Ultrasonographic prediction of term birth weight: How accurate is it? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:566–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shinozuka N, Okai T, Kohzuma S, Mukubo M, Shih CT, Maeda T, et al. Formulas for fetal weight estimation by ultrasound measurements based on neonatal specific gravities and volumes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:1140–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Roecker E, Harrist RB, Park SK. Relation of fetal femur length to neonatal crown-heel length. J Ultrasound Med. 1984;3:1–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Campbell S, Thoms A. Ultrasound measurement of the fetal head to abdomen circumference ratio in the assessment of growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1977;84:165–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sabbagha RE, Minogue J, Tamura RK, Hungerford SA. Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large- appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:854–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Winick M. Cellular changes during placental and fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;109:166–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Guihard-Costa AM, Droulle P, Larroche JC. Growth velocity of the biparietal diameter, abdominal transverse diameter and femur length in the fetal period. Early Hum Dev. 1991;27:93–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guihard-Costa AM, Larroche JC. Growth velocity of some fetal parameters. II. Body weight, body length and head circumference. Biol Neonat. 1992;62:317–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams RL, Creasy RK, Cunningham GC, Hawes WE, Norris FD, Tashiro M. Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59:624–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Battaglia FC, Frazier TM, Hellegers AE. Birth weight, gestational age, and pregnancy outcome, with special reference to high birth weight-low gestational age infant. Pediat. 1966;37:417–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967;71:159–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanderson DA, Wilcox MA, Johnson IR. The individualized birth-weight ratio: A new method of identifying intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:310–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stefos T, Deter RL. Individual growth curves standards for fetal head and abdominal circumferences: Effect of the type of measurement on growth prediction. J Clin Ultrasound. 1989;17:33–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Elliott JP, Garite TJ, Freeman RK, McQuown DS, Patel JM. Ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;60:159–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Boyd ME, Usher RH, McLean FH. Fetal macrosomia: prediction, risks, proposed management. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:715–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Campbell S. The assessment of fetal development by diagnostic ultrasound. Clin Perinatol. 1974;1:507–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Miller HC, Merritt TA. Fetal growth in humans. Chicago: Year Book; 1979. p. 31–57, 127–141.

  32. Winick M. Cellular changes during placental and fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;109:166–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Naeye RL. Abnormalities in infants of mothers with toxemia of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966;95:276–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wladimiroff JW, van den Wijngaard JA, Degani S, Noordam MJ, von Eyck J, Tonge HM. Cerebral and umbilical arterial blood flow velocity waveform in normal and growth retarded pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:705–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB. Sonographic detection of abnormal fetal growth patterns. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1984;27:342–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller JM, Kissling GE, Brown HL, Nagel PM, Korndorffer FA, Gabert HA. In utero growth of the large-for-menstrual-age fetus. J Clin Ultrasound. 1989;17:15–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Warsof SL, Cooper DJ, Little D, Campbell S. Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:33–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Divon MY, Chamberlain PF, Sipos L, Manning FA, Platt LD. Identification of the small for gestational age fetus with the use of gestational age-independent indices of fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155:1197–201.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Saltzman DH. Sonographic determination of fetal weights in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:441–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vintzileos AM, Neckles S, Campbell WA, Kaplan BM, Andreoli JW, Nochimson DJ. Ultrasound fetal thigh-calf circumferences and gestational age-independent fetal ratios in normal pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. 1985;4:287–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Petrikovsky BM, Oleschuk C, Lesser M, Gelertner N, Gross B. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using sonographically measured abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness. J Clin Ultrasound. 1997;25:378–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Abramowicz JS, Sherer DM, Woods JR. Ultrasonographic measurement of cheek-to-cheek diameter in fetal growth disturbances. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:405–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kurjak A. Rajhvajn B Jr: Ultrasonic measurements of umbilical blood flow in normal and complicated pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 1982;10:3–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wladimiroff JW, McGhie JS. Ultrasonic assessment of cardiovascular geometry and function in the human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;88:870–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wladimiroff JW, Tonge HM, Stewart PA. Doppler ultrasound assessment of cerebral blood flow in the human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;93:471–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wladimiroff JW, Noordam MJ, van den Wijngaard JA, Hop WC. Fetal internal carotid and umbilical artery blood flow velocity waveforms as a measure of fetal well-being in intrauterine growth retardation. Pediat Res. 1988;24:609–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Satoh S, Koyanagi T, Fukuhara M, Hara K, Nakano H. Changes in vascular resistance in the umbilical and middle cerebral arteries in the human intrauterine growth-retarded fetus, measured with pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Early Hum Dev. 1989;20:213–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Veille JC, Ben-Ami M, Sivakoff M. Ranged-gated-pulsed Doppler of the umbilical artery in human fetuses during normal pregnancies. Am J Perinat. 1991;8:269–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Soothill PW, Nicolaides KH, Rodeck CH, Campbell S. Effect of gestational age on fetal and intervillous blood gas and acid-base values in human pregnancy. Fetal Ther. 1986;1:168–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Banu AA. Doppler velocimetry in the umbilical and middle cerebral arteries in fetuses with intrauterine growth retardation or fetal distress. Fukuoka Acta Med. 1998;89:133–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Fleischer A, Schulman H, Farmakides G, Bracero L, Blattner P, Randolph G. Umbilical artery velocity waveforms and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:502–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Giles WB, Trudinger BJ, Baird PJ. Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance. Pathological correlation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92:31–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Divon MY, Guidetti DA, Braverman JJ, Oberlander E, Langer O, Merkatz IR. Intrauterine growth retardation - a prospective study of the diagnostic value of real-time sonography combined with umbilical artery flow velocimetry. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72:611–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gaziano E, Knox GE, Wager GP, Bendel RP, Boyce DJ, Olson J. The predictability of the small-for-gestational-age infant by real-time ultrasound-derived measurements combined with pulsed Doppler umbilical artery velocity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:1431–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gudmundsson S, Marsal K. Umbilical and uteroplacental blood flow velocity waveforms in pregnancies with fetal growth retardation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;27:187–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Senat MV, Schwarzler P, Alcais A, Ville Y. Longitudinal changes in the ductus venosus, cerebral transverse sinus and cardiotocogram in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:19–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mari G, Deter RL. Cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in normal and small-for-gestational age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1262–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hecher K, Campbell S, Doyle P, Harrington K, Nicolaides K. Assessment of fetal compromise by Doppler ultrasound of the fetal circulation. Circulation. 1995;91:129–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Fairlie FM. Doppler flow velocimetry in hypertension in pregnancy. Clin Perinat. 1991;18:749–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Weiss E, Ulrich S, Berle P. Condition at birth of infants with previously absent or reverse umbilical artery end-diastolic flow velocities. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1992;252:37–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Pattinson RC, Odendaal HJ, Kirsten G. The relationship between absent end-diastolic velocities of the umbilical artery and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Early Hum Dev. 1993;33:61–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Arduini D, Rizzo G, Romanini C. The development of abnormal heart rate patterns after absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: Analysis of risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:43–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Battaglia C, Artini PG, Galli PA, D’Ambrogio G, Droghini F, Genazzani AR. Absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in umbilical artery and severe intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72:167–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Divon NY, Girz BA, Lieblich R, Langer O. Clinical management of the fetus with markedly diminished umbilical artery end-diastolic flow. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:1523–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Rochelson B, Schulman H, Farmakides G, Bracero L, Ducey J, Fleischer A, et al. The significance of absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery velocity waveforms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:1213–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Laurin J, Marsal K, Persson PH, Lingman G. Ultrasound measurement of fetal blood flow in predicting fetal outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;94:940–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Hackett GA, Campbell S, Gamsu H, Cohen O, Pearce JMF. Doppler studies in the growth retarded fetus and prediction of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, haemorrhage, and neonatal mobidity. Br Med J. 1987;294:13–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Arbeille PH, Maulik D, Stree JL, Amyel C, Deufel M. Fetal renal and cerebral Doppler in small for gestational age fetuses in hypertensive pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994;56:111–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Gudmundsson S, Huhta JC, Wood DC, Tulzer G, Cohen AW, Weiner S. Venous Doppler ultrasonography in the fetus with non-immune hydrops. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:33–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Huisman TWA. Doppler assessment of the fetal venous system. Semin Perinatol. 2001;25:21–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Chiba Y, Utsu M, Kanzaki T, Hasegawa T. Changes in venous flow and intratracheal flow in fetal breathing movements. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1985;11:43–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Rizzo G, Arduini D, Romanini C. Inferior vena cava flow velocity waveforms in appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1271–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Hecher K, Hackeloer BJ. Cardiotocogram compared to Doppler investigation of the fetal circulation in the premature growth-retarded fetus: Longitudinal observations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9:152–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Huhta JC. Right ventricular function in the human fetus. J Perinat Med. 2001;29:381–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Antepartum Fetal Surveillance. ACOG Practice Bulletin #9, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington DC 1999.

  76. Trudinger BJ, Cook CM, Giles WB, Fong E, Connelly A, Wilcox W. Fetal umbilical artery velocity waveforms and subsequent neonatal outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:378–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Davies JA, Gallivan S, Spencer JAD. Randomized controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound screening of placental perfusion during pregnancy. Lancet. 1992;340:1299–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Johnstone FD, Prescott R, Hoskins P, Greer IA, Mcglew T, Compton M. The effect of introduction of umbilical Doppler recordings to obstetric practice. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:733–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Whittle MJ, Hanretty KP, Primrose MH, James P, Neilson MD. Screening for the compromised fetus: A randomized trial of umbilical artery velocimetry in unselected pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:555–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Indick JH, Chen V, Reed KL. Association of umbilical venous with inferior vena cava blood flow velocities. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:551–7.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Rizzo G, Arduini D, Romanini C. Inferior vena cava flow velocity waveforms in appropriate and small for gestational age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1271–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Baschat AA, Harman CR. Antenatal assessment of the growth restricted fetus. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;13:161–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank L. Saza for preparation of the English manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, Japan

    Toshiyuki Yoshizato

  2. Maternity and Perinatal Care Center, Oita Prefectural Hospital, Oita, Japan

    Shoji Satoh

Authors
  1. Toshiyuki Yoshizato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shoji Satoh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiyuki Yoshizato.

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshizato, T., Satoh, S. Morphological and functional evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal growth by ultrasonography. J Med Ultrasonics 36, 105–117 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-009-0224-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-009-0224-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation