Journal of Medical Ultrasonics

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 3–8 | Cite as

Growth inhibition of neurofibroma by ultrasound-mediated interferon γ transfection

  • Kazuki Yamaguchi
  • Loreto B. FerilJr
  • Yoshimi Harada
  • Hitomi Endo
  • Yutaka Irie
  • Juichiro Nakayama
  • Katsuro TachibanaEmail author
Original Article



We have previously shown that ultrasound-mediated transfection (sonotransfection) can be optimized using a concept based on the ultrasound-induced apoptosis produced in our in vitro experiments. At optimized conditions, we have shown, using five cancer cell lines, that sonotransfection is superior to other conventional nonviral methods. Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) transfection using lipofection has been found to markedly inhibit the proliferation of neurofibroma cell lines. In this study, we investigated whether sonotransfection of IFN-γ to neurofibroma cell lines can suppress cell proliferation.


The ultrasound device used was the SonoPore KTAC-4000, which is capable of various acoustic settings. Ultrasound transducers at an oscillation frequency of 1.011 MHz were used; the potential ideal conditions were an intensity of 0.17 W/cm2 at a burst frequency of 0.5 Hz, 25% duty factor, and 30-s sonication duration. Cells were assayed at 3 and 5 days after sonication.


The transfection efficiency was found to be 12%. The ultrasound-treated cells were successfully transfected with IFN-γ genes as detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the cell growth ratio in the IFN-γ sonotransfection group tended to be lower than that in the other experimental groups.


These results suggested that IFN-γ sonotransfection could potentially become a nonsurgical method for treating skin lesions such as neurofibromas.


ultrasound transfection sonotransfection interferon γ neurofibroma 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wilson DR. Viral-mediated gene transfer for cancer treatment. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2002;3(2):151–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloquel C, Fabre E, Bureau MF, et al. Plasmid DNA electrotransfer for intracellular and secreted protein expression: new methodological developments and applications. J Gene Med 2004;6Suppl 1:S11–S23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Uesato M, Gunji Y, Tomonaga T, et al. Synergistic antitumor effect of antiangiogenic factor genes on colon 26 produced by low-voltage electroporation. Cancer Gene Ther 2004;11(9):625–632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kikuchi A, Aoki Y, Sugaya S, et al. Development of novel cationic liposomes for efficient gene transfer into peritoneal disseminated tumor. Hum Gene Ther 1999;10(6):947–955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yamashita Y, Shimada M, Tachibana K, et al. In vivo gene transfer into muscle via electro-sonoporation. Hum Gene Ther 2002;13(17):2079–2084.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kennedy JE. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5(4):321–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feril LB Jr, Kondo T, Umemura S, et al. Sound waves and antineoplastic drugs: the possibility of an enhanced combined anticancer therapy. J Med Ultrasonics 2002;29(4):173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feril LB Jr, Kondo T. Biological effects of low-intensity ultrasound: the mechanism involved and its implications on therapy and on biosafety of ultrasound. J Radiat Res 2004;45(4):479–489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nozaki T, Ogawa R, Feril LB Jr, et al. Enhancement of ultrasoundmediated transfection by membrane modification. J Gene Med 2003;5(12):1046–1055.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lawrie A, Brisken AF, Francis SE, et al. Ultrasound-enhanced transgene expression in vascular cells is not dependent upon cavitation-induced free radicals. Ultrasound MedBiol 2003;29(10):1453–1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Newman CM, Lawrie A, Brisken AF, et al. Ultrasound gene therapy: on the road from concept to reality. Echocardiography 2001;18(4):339–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ogawa R, Kagiya G, Feril LB Jr, et al. Ultrasound mediated intravesical transfection enhanced by treatment with lidocaine or heat [comment]. J Urol 2004;172(4 Pt 1):1469–1473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taniyama Y, Tachibana K, Hiraoka K, et al. Development of safe and efficient novel nonviral gene transfer using ultrasound: enhancement of transfection efficiency of naked plasmid DNA in skeletal muscle. Gene Ther 2002;9(6):372–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tachibana K, Uchida T, Ogawa K, et al. Induction of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound. Lancet 1999;353(9162):1409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feril LB Jr, Ogawa R, Tachibana K, et al. Optimized ultrasound-mediated gene transfection in cancer cells. Cancer Sci 2006;97(10):1111–1114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nakashima M, Tachibana K, Iohara K, et al. Induction of reparative dentin formation by ultrasound-mediated gene delivery of growth/differentiation factor 11. Hum Gene Ther 2003;14(6):591–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baque P, Pierrefite-Carle V, Gavelli A, et al. Naked DNA injection for liver metastases treatment in rats. Hepatology 2002;35(5):1144–1152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ng KY, Liu Y. Therapeutic ultrasound: its application in drug delivery. Med Res Rev 2002;22(2):204–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakakima Y, Hayashi S, Yagi Y, et al. Gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma using sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents. Cancer Gene Ther 2005;12(11):884–889.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nakayama J, Tanaka T, Arakawa F, et al. Gamma interferon gene transfection efficiently inhibits proliferation of neurofibroma cell lines in vitro. J Dermatol 2003;30(3):181–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nakayama J, Terao H. Gamma interferon directly inhibits the growth of neurofibroma cells in vitro. J Dermatol 2002;29(9):556–561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lalani AS, Chang B, Lin J, et al. Anti-tumor efficacy of human angiostatin using liver-mediated adeno-associated virus gene therapy. Mol Ther J Am Soc Gene Ther 2004;9(1):56–66.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shinozaki K, Ebert O, Kournioti C, et al. Oncolysis of multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma in the rat liver by hepatic artery infusion of vesicular stomatitis virus. Mol Ther J Am Soc Gene Ther 2004;9(3):368–376.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Armeanu S, Lauer UM, Smirnow I, et al. Adenoviral gene transfer of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand overcomes an impaired response of hepatoma cells but causes severe apoptosis in primary human hepatocytes. Cancer Res 2003;63(10):2369–2372.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yotnda P, Davis AR, Hicks MJ, et al. Liposomal enhancement of the antitumor activity of conditionally replication-competent adenoviral plasmids [published erratum appears in Mol Ther 2004;10(2):404]. Mol Ther J Am Soc Gene Ther 2004;9(4):489–495.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuki Yamaguchi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Loreto B. FerilJr
    • 1
  • Yoshimi Harada
    • 1
  • Hitomi Endo
    • 1
  • Yutaka Irie
    • 1
  • Juichiro Nakayama
    • 2
  • Katsuro Tachibana
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyFukuoka University School of MedicineFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyFukuoka University School of MedicineFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations