A Delphi Survey and Analysis of Expert Perspectives on One Health in Australia
- 275 Downloads
One Health (OH) is an interdisciplinary approach aiming to achieve optimal health for humans, animals and their environments. Case reports and systematic reviews of success are emerging; however, discussion of barriers and enablers of cross-sectoral collaboration are rare. A four-phase mixed-method Delphi survey of Australian human and animal health practitioners and policymakers (n = 52) explored areas of consensus and disagreement over: (1) the operational definition of OH; (2) potential for cross-sectoral collaboration; and (3) key priorities for shaping the development of an OH response to significantly elevated zoonotic disease risk. Participants agreed OH is essential for effective infectious disease prevention and control, and on key priorities for outbreak responses, but disagreed over definitions and the relative priority of animal health and welfare and economic considerations. Strong support emerged among Australian experts for an OH approach. There was also recognition of the need to ensure cross-sectoral differences are addressed.
KeywordsAnimal health Cross-sectoral collaboration Delphi survey Emerging infectious diseases Human health One Health
We are indebted to our colleagues at the National University of Singapore for permission to use elements of their study design as a starting point for our Delphi survey. The work in Singapore is being conducted through the One Health, Zoonotic Diseases and Pandemic Planning Project: Creating a Bioethics Framework in Singapore; MOH/CDPHRG/0011/2014; Communicable Diseases Public Health Research Fund, Ministry of Health Singapore. Our research was funded by NHMRC Grant #1083079 Can One Health strategies be more effectively implemented through prior identification of public values?
- Allen-Scott LK, Buntain B, Hatfield JM, Meisser A, Thomas CJ. Academic Institutions and One Health: Building Capacity for Transdisciplinary Research Approaches to Address Complex Health Issues at the Animal–Human–Ecosystem Interface. Academic Medicine 2015; 90(7): 866.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Baum F. The new public health. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).Google Scholar
- CDC (2010) Operationalizing “One Health”: a policy perspective—taking stock and shaping an implementation roadmap: meeting overview. Stone Mountain, Georgia: Centers For Disease Control and PreventionGoogle Scholar
- Häsler B, Gilbert W, Jones BA, Pfeiffer DU, Rushton J, Otte MJ (2012) The economic value of One Health in relation to the mitigation of zoonotic disease risks. In: Mackenzie JS, Jeggo M, Daszak P, Richt JA (eds) One Health: The Human-Animal-Environment Interfaces in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Berlin: Springer, pp 127–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morens DM, Fauci AS (2012) Emerging infectious diseases in 2012: 20 years after the Institute of Medicine Report. mBio. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00494-12
- Phillips N, Bridgeman J, Ferguson-Smith M. The BSE inquiry. London: http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk accessed on 12 February 2012: Stationery Office, 2000.
- Routledge R. Fisher’s Exact Test. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, Wiley, New York (1998), pp 1519–1523Google Scholar
- Rüegg SR, McMahon BJ, Häsler B, Esposito R, et al. (2017) A blueprint to evaluate one health. Frontiers of Public Health. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00020
- Ziglio E. The Delphi method and its contribution to decision-making. In: Adler M, Ziglio E, eds. Gazing Into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 1996: 3-33.Google Scholar