Chlamydiosis is a disease of birds and mammals, including people, caused by infection with the Gram-negative, intracellular bacterium, Chlamydia (Chlamydophila) psittaci (Family Chlamydiaceae, Order Chlamydiales) (Vanrompay et al. 1995; Andersen and Franson 2007). Birds are the primary hosts of C. psittaci (Andersen and Franson 2007), and a wide range of avian species is susceptible to infection (Kaleta and Taday 2003). Avian infections are frequently asymptomatic (Kaleta and Taday 2003) but can also cause a broad spectrum of disease (“avian chlamydiosis”) including respiratory, enteric, and ocular disease (Vanrompay et al. 1995; Andersen and Franson 2007). Gross lesions typically include air sacculitis, serositis, hepatomegaly, and splenomegaly (Vanrompay et al. 1995), and there is often concurrent infectious disease (Pennycott et al. 2009). Microscopic lesions are variable: splenic, hepatic, renal, and/or myocardial necrosis may be evident in acute cases; other findings can include splenic and/or hepatic histiocytosis, hepatic periportal inflammatory cell infiltrates, and biliary hyperplasia (Vanrompay et al. 1995).

Avian chlamydiosis has been diagnosed in a variety of wild bird species in Europe, particularly columbiforms (Order Columbiformes) such as collared doves (Streptopelia decaocto), feral pigeons (Columbia livia), and wood pigeons (Columba palumbus) (Bracewell and Bevan 1986; Magnino et al. 2009). Also, chlamydiosis has been diagnosed occasionally in passerines (Order Passeriformes) (Simpson and Bevan 1989; Holzinger-Umlauf et al. 1997; Pennycott et al. 2009). The first reported occurrence of the disease in passerines in Britain was in 1988, when robins (Erithacus rubecula), dunnocks (Prunella modularis) and Paridae (tit species) were affected in a garden in south-west England (Simpson and Bevan 1989). Subsequently, Pennycott et al. (2009) reported mortality of Fringillidae (finches), Paridae, and robins in a Scottish garden in 2008, in which trichomonosis was considered the primary cause of disease and death, but in which concurrent chlamydiosis was diagnosed in some of the birds examined. Colvile et al. (2012) described a further six incidents which affected Paridae and/or dunnocks and/or robins in England in 2009 (1 incident) and 2011 (5 incidents).

Chlamydia psittaci is currently classified into seven ompA genotypes, each of which appears to have a certain host predilection: genotype A (parrots), B (pigeons), C (ducks and geese), D (turkeys), E (pigeons, ducks and other species), F (parakeets), and E/B (ducks, turkeys and pigeons) (Vanrompay et al. 1997; Geens et al. 2005; Sachse et al. 2009). These data are derived mainly from studies of captive or farmed birds and feral pigeons: C. psittaci genotypes infecting wild passerines have rarely been determined (Kaleta and Taday 2003; Kalmar et al. 2013). In a recently proposed extension of the ompA typing scheme, subgroups of genotypes A (A-VS1, A-6BC and A-8455), E/B (EB-E30, EB-859 and EB-KKCP), and D (D-NJ1 and D-9N) were described, and six further avian genotypes were identified [in corvids, parrots, an oriental stork (Ciconia boyciana), and a brown skua (Stercorarius antarcticus lonnbergi)] (Sachse et al. 2008).

While pigeons and doves appear to be the major wild bird reservoir of C. psittaci across Europe (Bracewell and Bevan 1986; Magnino et al. 2009), variable and potentially high prevalences of C. psittaci infection have been demonstrated in some wild passerine populations. For example, in Germany, 215 of 399 (54%) clinically healthy tits [including 30 of 43 (70%) blue tits (Cyanistes (Parus) caeruleus), 169 of 318 (53%) great tits (Parus major) and 12 of 32 (38%) marsh tits (Poecile (Parus) palustris)] were found to be Chlamydia sp. positive from cloacal and pharyngeal swabs using immunofluorescent antibody testing (Holzinger-Umlauf et al. 1997). Olsen et al. (1998) detected C. psittaci in 9 of 219 (3%) passerines sampled in Sweden (using PCR on fecal samples), including 2 of 29 (7%) robins and 1 of 21 (5%) great tits. Observation of sick birds was not reported; therefore, it seems likely that birds sampled in this study were apparently healthy. Others have failed to detect C. psittaci infection in passerines: Zweifel et al. (2009) from 527 passerines [including 211 chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs), 47 great tits and 12 robins] sampled in Switzerland (by PCR on cloacal swabs), and Prukner-Radovćic et al. (2005) from 53 passerines (including 15 robins) sampled in Croatia (by ELISA on cloacal swabs). The prevalence of C. psittaci infection in wild passerines in Britain is unknown.

Chlamydia psittaci infection causes a range of symptoms in human beings (in which the disease is termed “psittacosis”), ranging from asymptomatic infection or mild, flu-like illness to severe respiratory disease that, in rare cases, can be fatal (Smith et al. 2011; Rehn et al. 2013). Human cases have most often been attributed not only to direct or indirect contact with infected captive psittacine birds (Palmer 1982; Wreghitt and Taylor 1988; Smith et al. 2011), but also to contact with poultry (particularly ducks) (Palmer 1982; Gaede et al. 2008; Laroucau et al. 2009) and racing and feral pigeons (Haag-Wackernagel and Moch 2004; Harkinezhad et al. 2009; Magnino et al. 2009). The origins of human psittacosis cases, however, are often undetermined [e.g., Health Protection Agency (HPA), and Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) 2012]. Other wild bird species have been implicated in some psittacosis outbreaks (Williams et al. 1998; Telfer et al. 2005; Herrmann et al. 2006; Rehn et al. 2013), including wild passerines, which were the suspected source of an outbreak that affected at least 25 people in southern Sweden in early 2013 (Rehn et al. 2013).

Wild bird carcasses tend not to be tested for C. psittaci infection routinely due to financial constraints (molecular tests are required to obtain a diagnosis) (Pennycott et al. 2009); therefore, the prevalence of chlamydiosis in British passerines has been under-investigated (Colvile et al. 2012). Here, we conducted a retrospective survey of selected garden bird carcasses submitted by members of the public across England and Wales in order to investigate the significance of chlamydiosis as a cause of disease in these species. We use the term “chlamydiosis” to describe cases in which C. psittaci infection was detected in birds which had gross, histological, and immunohistochemical findings consistent with the disease. We conducted C. psittaci genotyping of positive cases in order to further our understanding of the epidemiology of the infection in British garden birds.


Wild Bird Cases

Reports of sick and dead wild birds were received from the general public through a national disease surveillance network established as part of the Garden Bird Health initiative (GBHi) (Robinson et al. 2010). Morbidity and mortality incidents were reported either on an ad hoc basis or through a systematic volunteer scheme (Robinson et al. 2010). A detailed description of each incident was obtained, including the species and number of birds affected, date when sick and/or dead birds were first observed, location, and clinical signs. If available, carcasses suitable for post-mortem examination (PME) were submitted.

On receipt, carcasses were either refrigerated at 4°C and examined within 48 h, or frozen at −20°C and examined at a later date. PMEs followed a standardized protocol, as described by Lawson et al. (2011). Birds were assigned to the age classes “Nestling,” “Juvenile,” (fully fledged and independent from nest) or “Adult” (any individual beyond its post-juvenile molt), and sex was determined, where possible, on the basis of plumage characteristics or gonad inspection. Carcasses were weighed, and body condition was subjectively assessed (as “Emaciated,” “Thin,” “Normal,” or “Fat”) on the basis of subcutaneous fat deposits and pectoral muscle condition. Samples (liver, small-intestinal content, and tissues with macroscopic lesions) were routinely submitted for microbiological examination using a standardized protocol (Lawson et al. 2011). A saline mount preparation of small-intestinal contents was examined microscopically for parasites. A standard range of tissues from each case was frozen at −20°C pending further testing and, where the state of carcass preservation permitted, tissue samples were fixed in neutral-buffered 10% formalin pending histological examination. Tissues were submitted for further tests (in addition to those described below) as indicated by the macroscopic findings, including culture and PCR to detect Trichomonas sp. infection (Robinson et al. 2010), and histopathology and PCR to detect avipoxvirus infection (Lawson et al. 2012).

Cases were selected for C. psittaci testing from an archive of 1,578 passerine and columbiform carcasses received at the Institute of Zoology from across England and Wales, 2005–2011, on the basis of either (1) having gross lesions consistent with previously reported chlamydiosis incidents (hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly and/or serositis), or (2) having been from a mortality incident in which the species assemblage of sick and dead birds was consistent with previously reported passerine chlamydiosis incidents (involvement of robins and/or Paridae and/or dunnocks). In addition, tissues from six passerine carcasses in which chlamydiosis had already been diagnosed (Colvile et al. 2012) were submitted for molecular C. psittaci testing.

Molecular Detection of C. psittaci Infection

DNA was extracted from frozen/thawed liver, or from pooled liver and spleen where both archived tissues were available, using a Biosprint 15 DNA Blood Kit (Qiagen Ltd., Manchester, M15 6SH, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified DNA was stored at 4°C, until the molecular analyses were performed.

All samples were examined by real-time PCR with primers specific for the 23S rRNA gene (Family Chlamydiaceae) using an ABI 7500 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) following methods described by Ehricht et al. (2006) and Zweifel et al. (2009) which had a detection limit of 1 inclusion-forming unit (ifu) (Ehricht et al. 2006). A positive control (C. abortus DNA) and a negative control (reaction mix with molecular biology grade water) were included in each PCR run. Each sample was tested in duplicate. When both Ct-values were <38, a sample was considered as positive (Zweifel et al. 2009). Samples for which one or both duplicates gave Ct-values of >38 were considered as questionably positive. If amplification was absent in both duplicates, the sample was interpreted as negative, and no further molecular tests were performed. Positive and questionably positive samples were further examined using each of the following three tests:

  1. (1)

    A Chlamydia species-specific 23S ArrayTube (AT) Microarray assay (Alere Chip Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany) as described by Borel et al. (2008), which had a detection limit of 1 ifu (Ehricht et al. 2006).

  2. (2)

    A C. psittaci ompA real-time PCR, which had a detection limit of 2 ifu, as described by Pantchev et al. (2009). Each sample was tested in duplicate with positive (C. psittaci DNA) and negative (molecular grade water) controls included. A sample was considered as positive when the average Ct-value was <36 (Pantchev et al. 2009), and as questionable positive when the average Ct-value was >36.

  3. (3)

    A C. psittaci genotyping assay, as described by Sachse et al. (2008). In the case of weak signals where the ompA genotype could not be accurately identified by the software, the assignment was done manually based on the closest match: these cases were termed “weak positive.” The lowest amount of DNA required for correct typing was equivalent to 2 ifu (Sachse et al. 2009).

Samples were considered positive for C. psittaci if they were positive (including—for the C. psittaci genotyping assay—“weak positive”) on at least one of these three further tests.

Histology and Immunohistochemistry

In C. psittaci-positive cases for which formalin-fixed tissues were available, the significance of the infection was investigated using histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry.

Formalin-fixed tissues were prepared for histopathological examination using routine methods (Bancroft 2008), and 5-µm-thick sections were examined using various stains including H&E, Ziehl-Neelsen, Giemsa, Periodic Acid-Schiff, and Gram-Twort.

Chlamydia spp.-specific immunohistochemistry, using anti-chlamydial lipopolysaccharide antibody (mouse IgG1, clone 13/4; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., California, USA), was performed on paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissue sections following the methodology described by Buxton et al. (1996).

A diagnosis of chlamydiosis was made for C. psittaci-positive cases which had co-localization of Chlamydia spp.-specific immunolabeling with histological lesions consistent with the disease [such as splenic, hepatic, renal and/or myocardial necrosis, splenic and/or hepatic histiocytosis, hepatic periportal inflammatory cell infiltrates, and biliary hyperplasia (Vanrompay et al. 1995)].


Wild Bird Cases

Tissues from 40 birds (from 38 mortality incidents) in the case archive fulfilled our selection criteria and were tested for C. psittaci infection using molecular methods. These comprised 35 passerines (from 33 mortality incidents) and 5 columbiforms (from a further 5 mortality incidents) (Table 1).

Table 1 Number of birds of each species submitted for molecular testing for C. psittaci infection and summary of results

Molecular Detection of C. psittaci Infection

Tissues from 21 of the 40 selected cases tested positive for C. psittaci DNA: all of 8 dunnocks, 7 (of 12) great tits, 3 (of 4) blue tits, 2 (of 3) collared doves, and 1 (of 4) robins (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1). For the positive cases, the results of each of the molecular tests are presented in Table 2. The 21 positive cases had been submitted from 20 separate mortality incidents, the details of which are presented in Table 3. Each of 4 corvids, 2 feral pigeons, 1 wren (Troglodytes troglodytes), 1 chaffinch, and 1 pied wagtail (Motacilla alba) tested were negative.

Table 2 Results of PCR, ArrayTube Microarray, and genotyping assays in C. psittaci-positive birds
Table 3 Details of mortality incidents and gross post-mortem examination findings in C. psittaci-positive birds

Nine C. psittaci-positive birds were from eight incidents of multi-species passerine mortality; eight positive birds were from incidents in which only a single bird had been observed to be sick or found dead; and four positive birds were from sites of multiple mortality where a single species had been affected [including two nestlings—a robin (Case 13) and a blue tit (Case 14)—from failed nests] (Table 3). Positive cases had either been observed with non-specific clinical signs (fluffed up plumage and/or lethargy) prior to death (11 cases), had been found dead (4 cases), had suffered trauma (including predation) (at least 6 cases), or had been euthanized for welfare reasons (2 cases). One positive blue tit (Case 21) had been submitted from an incident in which it, and other blue tits and great tits, had been observed with apparent dyspnea and ocular disease. Two positive collared doves were from separate incidents where no other sick or dead birds were observed; there was no report of columbiform morbidity or mortality at any of the positive passerine incidents (Table 3).

Eighteen of the 21 C. psittaci-positive birds were adults, comprising 7 males (4 great tits, 2 dunnocks, and 1 blue tit), 6 females (4 great tits, 1 dunnock, and 1 collared dove), and 5 birds of undetermined sex (2 great tits, 2 dunnocks and 1 blue tit) (Table 3). The remaining positive birds were nestlings (see above) and a juvenile collared dove (Table 3). Positive cases had been submitted in each year of the study: 1 (of 1 tested) was from 2005, 1 (2) from 2006, 7 (12) from 2007, 1 (4) from 2008, 5 (9) from 2009, 5 (8) from 2010, and 1 (4) was from 2011. The positive birds had been found dead in all seasonal quarters of the year: 7 had been found in January-March; 7 in April–June; 2 in July–September; and 5 in October–December. Figure 1 shows the locations of positive and negative cases.

Figure 1
figure 1

Geographical distribution of garden birds tested for C. psittaci (2005–2011). Closed squares represent sites from which C. psittaci-positive birds were submitted; closed triangles represent sites from which six additional positive birds (described by Colvile et al. 2012) were submitted; and open circles represent sites from which birds negative for C. psittaci were submitted.

The C. psittaci genotype involved was determined for 17 of the 21 positive birds (Table 2). Genotype A was present in all 15 passerine cases for which the genotype was determined (7 dunnocks, 6 great tits and 2 blue tits) and was subtyped as genotype A-VS1 in 11 cases (6 dunnocks, 4 great tits and 1 blue tit) and as genotype A-6BC in 4 cases (2 great tits, 1 dunnock, and 1 blue tit). A further 3 dunnocks and 3 robins confirmed to have chlamydiosis in a previous study (Colvile et al. 2012) were also found to have been infected with genotype A-VS1. The two positive collared doves examined were infected with C. psittaci genotype E.

Pathological Examination

Of the 21 C. psittaci-positive birds, the state of carcass preservation in six birds precluded histopathological or immunohistochemical evaluation (Supplementary Table 2). Of the 15 birds for which tissues were examined microscopically, the significance of C. psittaci infection was unclear in five (Supplementary Table 2), but chlamydiosis was diagnosed by histological and immunohistochemical examination in 10 (Table 4 and Fig 2): 5 dunnocks, 3 great tits, and 2 collared doves, from 9 separate mortality incidents. Of the chlamydiosis cases, body condition was “emaciated” in 6 cases, “thin” in 3 cases, and “normal” in 1 case; splenomegaly was suspected/confirmed in 7 cases, hepatomegaly was suspected/confirmed in 5 cases, and serositis was present in 4 cases (Table 4).

Table 4 Pathological findings from wild birds with chlamydiosis
Figure 2
figure 2

Liver of a dunnock (Prunella modularis) (Case 9), showing a multiple random foci of coagulative hepatocellular necrosis on H&E stain and b semi-serial section of liver subjected to immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Chlamydia spp. bacteria specific LPS: note positive labeling (red/brown pigment) in the cytoplasm of many of the necrotic hepatocytes (central area with pale blue poorly demarcated cells) and also some viable hepatocytes (IHC with haematoxylin counter-stain).

There was concurrent infectious disease in over half (8/15) of the C. psittaci-positive cases examined microscopically. Avian pox was confirmed (using PCR +/- histology +/- electron microscopy) in five C. psittaci-positive great tits from separate incidents, including one (Case 16) with confirmed chlamydiosis (Table 4; Supplementary Table 2). Trichomonosis was diagnosed (using PCR and histology) in one C. psittaci-positive dunnock (Case 3) from a mortality incident affecting predominantly finch species (Table 3). Concurrent trauma, most commonly cat predation, was either confirmed or suspected in nine C. psittaci-positive cases, including four cases of confirmed chlamydiosis (Table 4).


When garden bird carcasses from 38 mortality incidents suggestive of chlamydiosis were examined retrospectively, chlamydiosis was diagnosed in at least one bird from each of nine incidents. Ten birds, submitted from 2006–2010, were positive for the disease: eight small passerines (5 dunnocks, 3 great tits) and two collared doves. The eight passerines were from seven separate mortality incidents, which add to eight previously confirmed incidents associated with chlamydiosis in small passerines in Britain (Simpson and Bevan 1989; Pennycott et al. 2009; Colvile et al. 2012). Colvile et al. (2012) described six small passerine chlamydiosis mortality incidents in England, five of which occurred in 2011 and questioned whether there had been a recent increase in the incidence of chlamydiosis in small passerines in Britain. Here, cases of passerine chlamydiosis were identified in each year of the study, indicating that any apparent increase in incidence is most likely to have been due to increased diagnostic effort. Furthermore, our results show that chlamydiosis is likely to have been a commoner cause of disease in small passerines than was previously recognized.

In addition to the 10 garden birds diagnosed with chlamydiosis, a further 11 birds found dead from 2005–2011 were positive for C. psittaci infection. Post-mortem tissue decomposition precluded histological or immunohistochemical examination in six of these cases, while in five cases there was equivocal evidence of chlamydiosis (tissues from four cases were negative on immunohistochemistry; one case had immunolabeling but no evidence of histological lesions consistent with chlamydiosis). Seven of the cases in which chlamydiosis was not confirmed (Cases 1, 3, 6, 13, 14, 18, and 19) had a high average Ct-value (38 or over) in the Chlamydiaceae-specific PCR assay, and in five of these cases at least one of the follow-up C. psittaci-specific assays was also negative, indicative of very low tissue concentrations of the bacterium. C. psittaci infection may not, therefore, have been a primary factor in the death of these birds and may have been incidental in some cases.

There was concurrent infectious disease in over half (8/15) of the C. psittaci-positive cases examined histologically: chlamydiosis was confirmed in 3 of these cases, while in 5 cases, histology was equivocal for chlamydiosis—indicating that another infectious disease may have been the primary cause of morbidity or death. Avian pox in great tits—an emerging infectious disease in Britain (Lawson et al. 2012)—was the most common concurrent infectious disease diagnosed (5 cases). In addition to chlamydiosis, a dunnock examined in the current study had trichomonosis. Concurrent chlamydiosis and trichomonosis were previously reported from a passerine mortality incident in Scotland in 2008 (Pennycott et al. 2009), and concurrent infectious disease is a common finding in other avian species affected by chlamydiosis (Vanrompay et al. 1995). At least four of the 21 C. psittaci-positive cases (including two cases with chlamydiosis) had evidence of cat predation. There have been rare reports of disease in cats and dogs associated with C. psittaci infection (Werth 1989), most commonly attributed to the animals having contact with pet parrots. The risk of pet cats or dogs acquiring the infection from wild birds is unknown but is likely to be low since there are few diagnosed cases of chlamydiosis in these companion animals.

Most (17 of 21) positive cases were selected for testing based on the presence of gross lesions typical of avian chlamydiosis (hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and serositis), hence any C. psittaci-positive cases with different or no gross lesions would have been overlooked during case selection for this study. Also, only certain species were selected for diagnostic testing. It is therefore not possible to make inferences regarding the prevalence of chlamydiosis, or C. psittaci infection, in the general passerine population in Britain from this study. Further investigation, particularly of cases with no gross or macroscopic lesions (or clinical signs) typical of chlamydiosis, is warranted in order to explore the prevalence of C. psittaci infection in passerines.

Both the number and species of birds that had been observed sick or dead in each of the C. psittaci-positive mortality incidents we identified were highly variable. In the eight positive incidents in which there had been multi-species mortality, tits, dunnocks, robins, and finches were the most commonly affected species, as observed in previous studies (Simpson and Bevan 1989; Pennycott et al. 2009). Such a species complement, however, was one of the criteria used for the selection of cases for this study and was the sole basis for the selection of cases from three incidents, so this observation will be circular. No apparent sex predisposition to C. psittaci infection or seasonality of infection was evident, although the relatively small sample size may provide limited inferences regarding these factors. C. psittaci-positive incidents were widespread geographically (Fig. 1). Two C. psittaci-positive cases were from Wales, where (to the authors’ knowledge) infection with C. psittaci in free-living passerines has not been reported previously.

The use of four very sensitive assays—one family-specific screening assay, combined with three C. psittaci-specific assays—ensured that the overall molecular diagnostic method was highly sensitive and specific. C. psittaci was characterized as genotype A in all 15 passerines in which this could be determined. The sub-genotype was determined to be A-VS1 in 11 cases and A-6BC in 4 cases. A further six passerines diagnosed with chlamydiosis in a previous study (Colvile et al. 2012) also had genotype A-VS1. Genotype A has been identified most commonly in captive psittacines (Sachse et al. 2008, 2009), but our results suggest it is also a common genotype in wild passerines in Britain. Genotype A-VS1 is the most common subtype of genotype A, with the broadest host range of all C. psittaci genotypes, having previously been identified in psittacines, poultry, pigeons, canaries, and pheasants (Sachse and Rüttger 2014). Genotype A-6BC has been identified in a similar range of host species to A-VS1 but appears to be less prevalent (Sachse and Rüttger 2014). In two collared doves with chlamydiosis (Cases 10 and 15), C. psittaci was characterized as genotype E. Genotype E has been identified previously in feral pigeons (Magnino et al. 2009).

Although all C. psittaci genotypes are potentially zoonotic (Vanrompay et al. 2007), genotype A is the most commonly identified genotype in people, including in patients with severe psittacosis (Heddema et al. 2006; Vanrompay et al. 2007; Gaede et al. 2008). C. psittaci genotype A was identified in all four genotyped cases in a recent outbreak of human psittacosis in southern Sweden (that affected at least 25 people), in which wild passerines were implicated as the source of infection (Rehn et al. 2013). The identification of C. psittaci genotype A in passerines in the current study supports wild passerines as a potential source of human infection. Case-control investigations of human psittacosis outbreaks in Australia and Sweden have identified direct or indirect contact with live or dead wild birds (Telfer et al. 2005; Rehn et al. 2013), cleaning of wild bird feeders (Rehn et al. 2013), time spent in the garden, and lawn mowing (Williams et al. 1998; Telfer et al. 2005) as risk factors for disease. It is recommended that the public take sensible hygiene precautions when handling sick or dead wild birds and garden bird feeders, and that they wet areas contaminated with bird droppings prior to cleaning to minimize aerosolization, to reduce the risk of infection with C. psittaci and other zoonotic pathogens (Pennycott et al. 2009; Colvile et al. 2012; Rehn et al. 2013).

Although the overall risk of C. psittaci transmission from wild birds to humans is likely to be low (Haag-Wackernagel and Moch 2004; Rehn et al. 2013), considering that over 12 million households provide supplementary food for garden birds in Britain (Davies et al. 2009), it is important to determine the prevalence of subclinical C. psittaci carriage in wild passerines in order to understand the risks of zoonotic transmission (Colvile et al. 2012).


Through this retrospective study, we almost double (from 8 to 15) the number of small passerine mortality incidents in Britain in which chlamydiosis has been diagnosed, showing that chlamydiosis may be a more common cause of disease in British passerines than was previously recognized. We diagnosed further cases of C. psittaci infection in passerines, and showed that it was unlikely to have been a primary pathogen in some birds. C. psittaci was characterized as genotype A in all the passerines (dunnocks, great tits, robins, and blue tits) from which it was determined, indicating that this is likely to be a common genotype in these species. As this genotype is known to be capable of infecting people, our results support a potential role for wild passerines in the zoonotic transmission of C. psittaci. Further research is required to determine the prevalence of C. psittaci infection in wild birds in Britain; people should be advised to take appropriate hygiene precautions when cleaning wild bird feeders or when handling sick or dead wild birds.