Skip to main content

The Role of Historical Persian Gardens on the Health Status of Contemporary Urban Residents

Gardens and Health Status of Contemporary Urban Residents

Abstract

The inherent economic and social challenges in major cities have been known to foster stress among the urban population. Frequent stress over long periods may well have serious damaging outcomes, resulting in ailments such as burnout syndrome, sleeplessness and exhaustion, depression, feelings of panic, among others. Therefore, providing access to resources that may enable people to cope with the stress of urban life has become a crucial phenomenon in the twentieth century. Increasing empirical evidence indicates that the presence of natural areas can contribute to enhancing the quality of life in many ways. This study examines two historical Persian gardens from the residents’ perspective in well-known, historic cities of Iran: Isfahan and Kerman. The data were collected through questionnaires (n = 252), semi-structured interviews (n = 20), and visual observation techniques. The findings demonstrate that nature, diversity and the gardens’ historical background, and coherence motivate the residents’ frequent visits to the gardens, which help to address their social, psychological, and physical needs. In addition, the residents’ involvements and the variety of experiences that occur in the gardens lead to the creation of deeper meanings and values associated with the gardens. Subsequently, these construct functional and emotional attachment that evokes a sense of place and identity and may contribute to society’s health and well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

References

  • Alves S (2003) The Role of Nature-related Activities in the Psychological Well-being of Nursing Home Residents. Doctor Philosophy, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

  • Appleton J (1975) The Experience of Landscape. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum A, Fleming R, Singer J (1985) Understanding environmental stress: strategies for conceptual and methodological integration. In A. Baum and J. E. Singer (Eds.), Advances in Environmental Psychology: Methods and Environmental Psychology, vol 5. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, pp 185-205. .

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum L N, Bresolin L B, Williams M A (1998) Heat-related Illness during Extreme Weather Emergencies, Journal of American Medical Association: 279:1514.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brink H (1991) Quantitative vs. qualitative research, Nursing RSA, 6, 14-18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesura A (2004) The role of urban parks for the sustainable city, Landscape and Urban planning, 68:129-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimprich B, and Ronis D, (2003) An Environmental Intervention to Restore Attention in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer. Cancer Nursing, 26 (4): 284–291.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S (1978) Environmental Load and the Allocation of Attention. In Baum A, Singer J E, and Valins S (Eds.), Advances in Environmental Psychology, 1. (pp. 1–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S, Evans G, Stokols D, and Krantz D (1986) Behavior, Health, and Environmental Stress, New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coley R, Kuo F, Sullivan W (1997) Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior, 29: 468-494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2003) Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vaus, D. (2001). Surveys in Social Research. (5th ed.). Berkeley, Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries S, Verheij R A, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P (2003) Natural environments–healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relation- ship between green space and health. Environment and Planning, 35, 1717–1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer J, Schroeder H, and Gobster P (1991) The Significance of Urban Forests: Towards a Deeper Understanding of Values. Journal of Arboriculture, 17, 276–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer J, McPherson E, Schroder H, and Rountree R (1992) Assessing the Benefits and Costs of the Urban Forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 18, 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eronene S, Nurmi J E, and Aro K S (1997) Planning-Oriented, Avoidant, and Impulsive Social Reaction Styles: A Person-Oriented Approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 34–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filho LW, Salomone M (2006) Innovative Approaches to Education for Sustainable Development, Turin, Italy

  • Furnass B (1979) Health Values. In: Messer, J., and Mosley, J. G. (Eds.) The Value of National Parks to the Community: Values and Ways of Improving the Contribution of Australian National Parks to the Community (pp. 60–69). Sydney: University of Sydney, Australian Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillham B (2005) Research Interviewing: The Range of Techniques, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobster P H (1995) Perception and Use of a Metropolitan Greenway System for Recreation, Landscape Urban Plan, 33, 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobster P H (2001) Visions of Nature: Conflict and Compatibility in Urban Park Restoration, Landscape Urban Plan, 56, 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grahn P and Stigsdotter U A (2003) Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2(1): 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenewegen PP, van den Berg AE, de Vries S, Verheij RA (2006) Vitamin G: effects of green space on health, well-being, and social safety. BMC Public Health, 6:149.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton S E, and Mercer D (1991) Urban Parks and Their Visitors. Melbourne: The Parks Division and Metropolitan Board of Works, pp. 1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T (1993) Nature Experience in Transactional Perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 25, 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington J, Daniel T C, and Brown T C (1993) Is Motion More Important Than It Sounds? The Medium of Presentation in Environmental Research, Environmental Psychology, 13, 283-291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo M C, Berto R, Galindo M P and Getrevi, A (2006) Identifying Attractive and Unattractive Urban Places: Categories, Restorativeness and Aesthetic Attributes. Journal of Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano,7 (2), 115-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivarsson C T, and Hagerhall C M (2008) The Perceived Restorativeness of Gardens – Assessing the Restorativeness of a Mixed Built and Natural Scene Type, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 7, 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim C Y and Chen W Y (2006) Impacts of Urban Environmental Elements on Residential Housing Prices in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4), 422-434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R (1989) The tension between development and open space: Insights from public participation. In Hardie G, Moore R, and Sanoff H (Eds.) Changing paradigms (pp.193-198), Oklahoma City: Environmental Design Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R (1992) The Psychological Benefits of Nearby Nature. Portland: Timber Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S (1995) The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Toward an Integrative Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169 – 182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R (2001) The nature of the view from home: psychological benefits. Environment and Behaviour 33, 507–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1982) The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmanov D, and Hamel R (2008) Assessing the restorative potential of contemporary urban environment(s): Beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(2): 115-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knecht C (2004) Urban nature and Well-being: Some Empirical Support and Design Implications. Berkeley Planning Journal (17): 82-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpela K M (2003) Negative mood and adult place preference. Environment and Behaviour 35, 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela K M, and Yle´n M (2007) Perceived health is associated with visiting natural favourite places in the vicinity. Health & Place, 13, 138-151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela K M, Ylén M, Tyrväinen L, and Silvennoinen, H (2008) Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health & Place, 14(4): 636-652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R (1999) Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo F E (2003) Social Aspects of Urban Forestry: The Role of Arboriculture in a Healthy Social Ecology. Arboriculture, 29, 3, 148-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo F E, Bacaicoa M, and Sullivan W C (1998) Transforming Inner City Landscapes: Trees, Sense of Place and Preference. Environment and Behaviour, 33, 343-367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus R S (1991) Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lothian A (1999) Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetic: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of beholder. Journal of landscape and urban planning, 44:177-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loures L, Santos R, and Panagopoulos T (2007) Urban Parks and Sustainable City Planning-the Case of Portimão, Portugal. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 3(10), 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch K (1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas J, Verheij R A, Groenewegen, P P, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P (2006) Green space, urbanity and health: how strong is the relation? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60 (7), 587–592.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus C C and Barnes M (1999) Healing gardens: Therapeutic benefits and design recommendations, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller J R (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(8): 430-434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R, Popham F (2007) Green space, urbanity and health: relationships in England. Journal of Epidemiological and Community Health, 61, 681–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore M, Townsend M, Oldroyd J (2006) Linking human and ecosystem health: the benefits of community involvement in conservation groups. EcoHealth Journal of Consortium, 3, 255–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasar J L (1983) Adult Viewer’s Preferences in Residential Scenes: A Study of the Relationship of Environmental Attributes to Preference. Journal of Environment and Behavior, 32, 2, 357-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen T S and Hansen K B (2007) Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators, Health & Place, 13(4): 839-850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordh H, Hartig T, Hagerhall C M, and Fry G (2009) Components of Small Urban Parks that Predict the Possibility for Restoration, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8, 225-235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak D J, Rowntree R A, McPherson E G, Sisinni S M, Kerkmann E R, and Stevens J C (1996) Measuring and Analysing Urban Tree Cover. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36(1), 49-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted FL (1865) The Value and Care of Parks. Report to the Congress of the State of California. Reprinted In Nash, R. (Ed.) (1976) The American Environment (pp 18-24), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Orians G H (1980) Habitat Selection: General Theory and Application to Human Behavior. In Lockard J S (Ed.) The Evolution of Social Behavior. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottosson J and Grahn P (2005) A Comparison of Leisure Time Spent in a Garden with Leisure Time Spent Indoors: On Measures of Restoration in Residents in Geriatric Care. Landscape Research, 30(1): 23-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons R, and Daniel T (2002) Good looking: In Defense of Scenic Landscape Aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60, 43-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons R, Tassinary L, Ulrich R, Hebl M, and Grossman-Alexander, M (1998) The View From the Road: Implications for Stress Recovery and Immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 113–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Peacock J, Sellens M and Griffin M (2005) The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise, International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15 (5), 319–337.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell T, Peron E, and Berto R (2001) Why do Preferences Differ between Scene Types? Environment and Behaviour, 33, 93-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde C L E and Kendle A D (1997) Nature for People. In Kendle, A. D., and Forbes, S. (Eds.) Urban Nature Conservation-Landscape Management in the Urban Countryside (pp. 319–335). London: E. and F. N. Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scazzosi L (2004) Reading and Assessing the Landscape as Cultural and Historical Heritage, Landscape Research, 4, 335-355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer C S, Lee B K, and Turner S (2000) A Tale of Three Greenway Trails: User Perceptions Related to Quality of Life. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49, 163-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St Leger, L., 2003. Health and Nature-New Challenges for Health Promotion. Health Promotion International, 18, 3, 173-175.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigsdotter U A (2004) A garden at your workplace may reduce stress. Journal of Design & Health, 13(7): 147-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano T, Nakamura K, Watanabe M (2002) Urban Residential Environments and Senior Citizens’ Longevity in Megacity Areas, The Importance of Walkable Green Spaces. Journal of Epidemiological Community Health, 56, 913–918.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S E, Repetti R, Seeman T (1997) Health Psychology: What is an Unhealthy Environment and How Does it Get Under the Skin? Annual Review of Psychology 48, 411–447.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teig E, Amulya J, Bardwell L, Buchenau M, Marshall J, and Litt J (2009) Collective Efficacy in Denver, Colorado: Strengthening Neighbourhoods and Health through Community Gardens. Health & Place, 15, 1115–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan Y F (1974) Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tveit M, Ode A and Fry G (2006) Key Concepts in a Framework for Analyzing Visual Landscape Character. Landscape Research, 31, 3, 229-255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrväinen L, Mäkinen K, and Schipperijn J (2007) Tool for Mapping Social Values of Urban Woodlands and Other Green Areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79, 5-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzoulas K, and James P (2003) Finding Links between Urban Biodiversity and Human Health and Well-being. Manchester: Research Institute for the Built and Human Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich R S (1983) Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment. Behavior and the natural Environment, 6: 85-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich R S (1984) View through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery. Science, 224(4647): 420.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS (1993) Biophilia, and natural landscapes The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp 73-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich R S (1999) Effects of Gardens on Health Outcomes: Theory and Research. In Marcus, C. C., and Barnes, M. (Eds.) Healing gardens: Therapeutic Benefits and Design Recommendations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS (2002) Health Benefits of Gardens in Hospitals. Paper for conference: Plants for People. International Exhibition Floriade. http://www.plantsatwork.org/pdf/HealthSettingsUlrich_copy.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2005

  • Ulrich R S, Simons R F, Losito B D, Fiorito E, Miles M A, and Zelson M (1991) Stress Recovery During Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002) Community, Culture, and the Environment: A Guide to Understand Sense of Place, EPA 842- B-01-03, Washington, DC: U.S. EPA.

  • Velarde MD, Fry G, Tveit M (2007) Health Effects of Viewing Landscapes–Landscapes Types in Environmental Psychology. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 10:1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westman M, Eden D (1997) Effects of a Respite from Work on Burnout: Vacation Relief and Fade-out. Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 516–527.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to appreciate UTM and Research Management Research (RMC) for providing the opportunity of this research and thank “Centre for The Study of Built Environment in the Malay World (KALAM)” for funding.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raheleh Rostami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rostami, R., Lamit, H., Khoshnava, S.M. et al. The Role of Historical Persian Gardens on the Health Status of Contemporary Urban Residents. EcoHealth 11, 308–321 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-014-0939-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-014-0939-6

Keywords

  • nature
  • urban green spaces
  • stress
  • mood change
  • well-being