Phylogeny, Life History, and Ecology Contribute to Differences in Amphibian Susceptibility to Ranaviruses
- 767 Downloads
Research that identifies the potential host range of generalist pathogens as well as variation in host susceptibility is critical for understanding and predicting the dynamics of infectious diseases within ecological communities. Ranaviruses have been linked to amphibian die-off events worldwide with the greatest number of reported mortality events occurring in the United States. While reports of ranavirus-associated mortality events continue to accumulate, few data exist comparing the relative susceptibility of different species. Using a series of laboratory exposure experiments and comparative phylogenetics, we compared the susceptibilities of 19 amphibian species from two salamander families and five anurans families for two ranavirus isolates: frog virus 3 (FV3) and an FV3-like isolate from an American bullfrog culture facility. We discovered that ranaviruses were capable of infecting 17 of the 19 larval amphibian species tested with mortality ranging from 0 to 100%. Phylogenetic comparative methods demonstrated that species within the anuran family Ranidae were generally more susceptible to ranavirus infection compared to species from the other five families. We also found that susceptibility to infection was associated with species that breed in semi-permanent ponds, develop rapidly as larvae, and have limited range sizes. Collectively, these results suggest that phylogeny, life history characteristics, and habitat associations of amphibians have the potential to impact susceptibility to ranaviruses.
KeywordsAnura Caudata Emerging infectious disease Frog virus 3 Iridoviridae Novel strain Phylogeny Reservoir
- Begon M (2008) Effects of host diversity on disease dynamics. In: Infectious Disease Ecology: The Effects of Ecosystems on Disease and of Disease on Ecosystems, Ostfeld R, Keesing F, Eviner VT (editors), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp 12–29.Google Scholar
- Brunner JL, Barnett KE, Gosier CJ, McNulty SA, Rubbo MJ, and Kolozsvary MB (2011). Ranavirus infection in die-offs of vernal pool amphibians in New York, USA. Herpetological Review 42:76-79.Google Scholar
- Carey C, Bradford DE, Brunner JL, Collins JP, et al. (2003) Biotic factors in amphibian declines. In: Amphibian Declines: An Integrated Analysis of Multiple Stressor Effects. Pensacola, FL: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, pp 153–208.Google Scholar
- Collinge SK, and Ray C (2006). Disease ecology: community structure and pathogen dynamics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Conant R, and Collins J (1998). A field guide to reptiles and amphibians of eastern and central North America, 3rd edition. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
- Converse KA, and Green DE (2005). Diseases of tadpoles. Pages 72-88 in S. K. Majumdar, J. E. Huffman, F. J. Brenner, and A. I. Panah, editors. Wildlife diseases: Landscape epidemiology, spatial distribution and utilization of remote sensing technology. The Pennsylvania Academy of Science, Easton, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Elliot L, Gerhardt HC, and Davidson C (2009). The frogs and toads of North America: A comprehensive guide to their identification, behavior, and calls. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Garland T, Harvey PH, and Ives AR (1992). Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41:18-32.Google Scholar
- Gosner KL (1960). A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes and identification. Herpetologica 16:183-190.Google Scholar
- Harvey PH, and Pagel M (1991). The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Lannoo M (2005). Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
- Martins EP (2004) COMPARE, version 4.6b. Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. Distributed by the author at http://compare.bio.indiana.edu/. Bloomington, IN: Department of Biology, Indiana University.
- Muths E, Gallant AL, Campbell EHC, Battaglin WA, Green DE, Staiger JS, et al. (2006) The Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative (ARMI): 5-year Report: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5224.Google Scholar
- Ostfeld R, Keesing F, and Eviner VT (2008). Infectious disease ecology: the effects of ecosystems on disease and of disease on ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
- Petranka JW (1998). Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- R_Development_Core_Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org.
- Schock DM, and Bollinger TK (2005). An apparent decline of Northern Leopard Frogs (Rana pipiens) on the Rafferty Dam Mitigation Lands near Estevan, Saskatchewan. Blue Jay 63:144-154.Google Scholar
- Schock DM, Bollinger TK, Chinchar VG, Jancovich JK, Collins JP (2008) Experimental evidence that amphibian ranaviruses are multi-host pathogens. Copeia 133–143.Google Scholar
- Wells KD (2007). The ecology and behavior of amphibians. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar