Skip to main content

Linking Human and Ecosystem Health: The Benefits of Community Involvement in Conservation Groups

Abstract

This study explored the health, well-being, and social capital benefits gained by community members who are involved in the management of land for conservation in six rural communities across Victoria. A total of 102 people participated in the study (64 males; 38 females) comprising 51 members of a community-based land management group and 51 controls matched by age and gender. Mixed methods were employed, including the use of an adapted version of Buckner’s (1988) Community Cohesion Scale. The results indicate that involvement in the management of land for conservation may contribute to both the health and well-being of members, and to the social capital of the local community. The members of the land management groups rated their general health higher, reported visiting the doctor less often, felt safer in the local community, and utilized the skills that they have acquired in their lifetime more frequently than the control participants. Male members reported the highest level of general health, and the greatest satisfaction with daily activities. Members also reported a greater sense of belonging to the local community and a greater willingness to work toward improving their community than their control counterparts. Of equal importance is evidence that involvement in voluntary conservation work constitutes a means of building social capital in rural communities which may help reduce some of the negative aspects of rural life.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Ansari MZ, Henderson T, Ackland M, Sundararajan V (2003) Congestive heart failure: urban and rural perspectives in Victoria. Australian Journal of Rural Health 11:266–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollman, RD (1998) Human capital and human development: What are the linkages? Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario

  • Buckner JC (1988) The development of an instrument to measure neighbourhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology 16:771–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burls A, Cann W (2004) Networking. Social exclusion and embracement: a helpful concept. Primary Health Care Research and Development 5:191–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivian E (2001) Environment and health: 7. Species loss and ecosystem disruption—the implications for human health. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 164:66–70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis A (2000) Exploring landcare from a voluntary perspective. Rural Society 10:47–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Human Services: Victoria (2000) The Victorian Burden of Disease Study, Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Government

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs L, Moore C (2002) Engaging communities in area-based regeneration: the role of participatory evaluation. Policy Studies 23:157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin RC (2003) Farm-related injury presenting to an Australian base hospital. Australian Journal of Rural Health 11:292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorrell C (2001) Nature’s path to inner peace. Psychology Today 34:62–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine KN, Warber SL (2002) Greening healthcare: practicing as if the natural environment really mattered. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 8:76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd F, Fraser C, Grigg M, Scopelliti J, Hodgins G, Donohue A, et al. (2002) Rural psychiatry: special issues and models of service delivery. Disease Management & Health Outcomes 10:771–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm H (2002) Primary mental health-care model in rural Tasmania: outcomes for patients. Australian Journal of Rural Health 10:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Smith D (2003) Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management. Conservation Biology 18:631–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam RD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidoti C (1999) Rural health: a human right. Australian Journal of Rural Health 7:202–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strong K, Trickett P, Titulaer I, Bhatia K (2002) Health in Rural and Remote Australia, Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend M, Marsh R (2004) Exploration of the Health and Well-being Benefits of Membership of Truganina Explosives Reserve Preservation Society, Burwood, Australia: School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Schirning Y (2002) Health and sustainable development: can we rise to the challenge? The Lancet 360:632–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan Moore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, M., Townsend, M. & Oldroyd, J. Linking Human and Ecosystem Health: The Benefits of Community Involvement in Conservation Groups. EcoHealth 3, 255–261 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-006-0070-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-006-0070-4

Key words

  • conservation
  • community
  • health
  • well-being
  • social capital