Advertisement

EcoHealth

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 17–21 | Cite as

Peering into the Fog: Ecologic Change, Human Affairs, and the Future

  • Colin ButlerEmail author
Commentaries

For millennia, humans from diverse cultures have used oracles and omens, from entrails to comets, to try to read the future. Science and mathematics have long contributed to this effort, originally through astronomy but increasingly through the use of supercomputers allied with ever more sophisticated theories and datasets. For a while (before modern computers), the universe was likened to an enormous mechanical clock, and a conceit arose that given sufficient data, theory, and computational power, science might one day refine the prediction of human affairs to an accuracy approaching the plotting of planetary orbits. The more recent discoveries of relativity, quantum mechanics, and chaos theory have shown the fallacy of this thinking and have even challenged the precision of astronomic forecasts.

Postmodernism has questioned other fundamentals, so that in some circles, definitive statements about even the present can seem audacious. However, the quest for the perfect should not...

Keywords

Fair Trade Pessimistic Scenario Collective Imagination United Nations Population Division Rwandan Genocide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. André, C, Platteau, J-P 1998Land relations under unbearable stress: Rwanda caught in the Malthusian trapJournal of Economic Behaviour and Organization34147Google Scholar
  2. Andrews EL (2004) Greenspan not too worried by the rise in energy prices. New York Times October 16Google Scholar
  3. Bossel, H 1998Earth at a Crossroads. Paths to a Sustainable FutureCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, CD 2000Entrapment: global ecological and/or local demographic? Reflections upon reading the BMJ’s “six billion day” special issueEcosystem Health6171180Google Scholar
  5. Dasgupta, P 2000Population and resources: an exploration of reproductive and environmental externalitiesPopulation and Development Review26643689Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, DG 2001On population and resources: a commentPopulation and Development Review27739747Google Scholar
  7. Kaplan, RD 1994The coming anarchyAtlantic Monthly2734476Google Scholar
  8. Mesquida, CG, Wiener, NI 1996Human collective aggression: a behavioral ecology perspectiveEthology and Sociobiology17247262Google Scholar
  9. Pacala, S, Socolow, R 2004Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologiesScience305968972Google Scholar
  10. Raskin, P, Gallopin, G, Gutman, P, Hammond, A, Kates, R, Swart, R 2002Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the Times AheadStockholm Environment InstituteBoston, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Ruddiman, WF 2003The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years agoClimate Change61261293Google Scholar
  12. Sontag D, Polgreen L (2004) Storm-battered Haiti’s endless crises deepen. New York Times October 16Google Scholar
  13. Swart, RJ, Raskin, P, Robinson, J 2004The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysisGlobal Environmental Change14137146Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EcoHealth Journal Consortium 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre for Epidemiology and Population HealthAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations