Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors affecting the uptake of optimal doses of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy using sulfadoxine pyrimethamine in Ghana: new evidence from the 2019 malaria indicator survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Globally, a significant proportion of women in areas with a high malaria burden are susceptible to the risk of malaria during pregnancy. The Ghana Health Service adopted an antimalarial policy that states that intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy using sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) shall be administered as directly observed therapy (DOT) monthly during antenatal care (ANC) until delivery. This study, therefore, examined the effect of individual, household and health related factors on the uptake of optimal doses of IPTp-SP for malaria in pregnancy in Ghana.

Methods

Data for this study were obtained from the 2019 Ghana Malaria Indicator Survey (GMIS) conducted between September 25 and November 24, 2019. The weighted sample comprised 353 pregnant women aged 15–49 years. Data were analysed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 using both descriptive and multinomial logistic regression modelling.

Results

The study found that 30.5% of pregnant women took optimal (≥ 3) doses of IPTp-SP to prevent malaria. Pregnant women aged 15–24 (aOR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.09–0.71) were 75% less likely to take optimal doses of IPTp-SP at health facilities than those aged 35–39. Similarly, pregnant women at 16 weeks of gestation (aOR = 0.40,95% CI = 0.20–0.80) were 60% less likely to take 3 or more SP doses than those between the gestational period 24 to 40 weeks. Again, pregnant women who tested negative for malaria (aOR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.09–0.32) had lower odds of taking up 1–2 SP doses and 3 or more SP doses (aOR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.04–0.43) than those who tested positive for malaria. Pregnant women who are not anaemic were 87% and 92% less likely to take 1–2 and 3 or more SP doses, respectively, to prevent malaria during pregnancy relative to pregnant women who are anaemic. However, pregnant women residing in urban areas were more likely (aOR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.01–4.90) to take optimal IPTp-SP doses than those dwelling in rural areas.

Conclusions

Significant reduction of malaria in pregnancy is highly determined by socio-demographic and health factors that affect pregnant women and crucial to the success of Ghana’s antimalarial drug policy. It is therefore recommended that the Ministry of Health, National Malaria Elimination Programme and Ghana Health Service take cognizance of these factors in planning and rolling out programmes towards improving IPTp-SP drug uptake among pregnant women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset used for this study are openly available and can be accessed via https://dhsprogram.com/.

References

  • Agyeman YN, Newton SK, Annor RB, Owusu-Dabo E (2020) The effectiveness of the revised intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) in the prevention of malaria among pregnant women in northern Ghana. J Trop Med 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2325304

  • Ameh S, Owoaje E, Oyo-Ita A, Kabiru CW, Akpet OE, Etokidem A et al (2016) Barriers to and determinants of the use of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in Cross River State, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. BMC Preg Childbirth 16(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0883-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anchang-Kimbi JK, Kalaji LN, Mbacham HF, Wepnje GB, Apinjoh TO, Ngole Sumbele IU et al (2020) Coverage and effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) on adverse pregnancy outcomes in the Mount Cameroon area, South West Cameroon. Malaria J 19(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03155-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anto F, Agongo IH, Asoala V, Awini E, Oduro AR (2019) Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: assessment of the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine three-dose policy on birth outcomes in rural Northern Ghana. J Trop Med 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6712685

  • Anto F, Ayepah C, Awini E, Bimi L (2021) Determinants of uptake of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria with sulfadoxine pyrimethamine in pregnancy: a cross-sectional analytical study in the Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolis of Ghana. Arch Public Health 79(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00694-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaldo P, Rovira-Vallbona E, Langa JS, Salvador C, Guetens P, Chiheb D et al (2018) Uptake of intermittent preventive treatment and pregnancy outcomes: health facilities and community surveys in Chókwè district, southern Mozambique. Malaria J 17(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2255-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awine T, Malm K, Bart-Plange C, Silal SP (2017) Towards malaria control and elimination in Ghana: challenges and decision making tools to guide planning. Glob Health Action 10(1):1381471. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1381471

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Azizi SC, Chongwe G, Chipukuma H, Jacobs C, Zgambo J, Michelo C (2018) Uptake of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria during pregnancy with Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) among postpartum women in Zomba District, Malawi: a cross-sectional study. BMC Preg Childbirth 18:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1744-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badirou A, Barikissou Georgia D, Roméo PSG, Modeste Luc K, Edgard Marius O (2018) Adherence to intermittent preventive treatment of Malaria in pregnancy with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine and associated factors: a cross-sectional survey in Benin’s public hospitals. Open Public Health J 11(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874944501811010028

  • Barrow A, Barrow S, Jobe A (2022) Differentials in prevalence and correlates on uptake of tetanus toxoid and intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine during pregnancy: a community-based cross-sectional study in The Gambia. SAGE Open Med 10:20503121211065908. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211065908

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boateng EY, Anyormi GE, Otoo J, Abaye DA (2018) Drivers of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy in Ghana: a generalized linear model with negative binomial approach. In Applied Informatics (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 1-12). SpringerOpen. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40535-018-0057-6

  • Brabin BJ, Warsame M, Uddenfeldt-Wort U, Dellicour S, Hill J, Gies S (2008) Monitoring and evaluation of malaria in pregnancy–developing a rational basis for control. Malaria J 7(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-S1-S6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chico RM, Dellicour S, Roman E, Mangiaterra V, Coleman J, Menendez C et al (2015) Global Call to Action: maximize the public health impact of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa. Malaria J 14(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0728-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chukwu C, Onuoha H, Okorafor KAK, Ojomo O, Mokuolu OA, Ekholuenetale M (2021) Geopolitical zones differentials in intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) and long lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) utilization in Nigeria. Plos one 16(7):e0254475. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Darteh EKM, Buabeng I, Akuamoah-Boateng C (2021) Uptake of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy for malaria: further analysis of the 2016 Ghana Malaria Indicator Survey. J Public Health 29:967–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01206-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai M, Ter Kuile FO, Nosten F, McGready R, Asamoa K, Brabin B, Newman RD (2007) Epidemiology and burden of malaria in pregnancy. Lancet Infect Diseases 7(2):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70021-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dun-Dery F, Meissner P, Beiersmann C, Kuunibe N, Winkler V, Albrecht J, Müller O (2021) Uptake challenges of intermittent preventive malaria therapy among pregnant women and their health care providers in the Upper West Region of Ghana: A mixed-methods study. Parasite Epidemiol Control 15:e00222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parepi.2021.e00222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Exavery A, Mbaruku G, Mbuyita S, Makemba A, Kinyonge IP, Kweka H (2014) Factors affecting uptake of optimal doses of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in six districts of Tanzania. Malaria J 13(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filler SJ, Kazembe P, Thigpen M, Macheso A, Parise ME, Newman RD et al (2006) Randomized trial of 2-dose versus monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in HIV-positive and HIV-negative pregnant women in Malawi. J Infect Diseases 194(3):286–293. https://doi.org/10.1086/505080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghana Health Service (2010) Anti-malaria drug policy for Ghana. Accra, Ghana

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), and Inner City Fund (2020). Ghana malaria indicator survey 2019

  • Ibrahim H, Maya ET, Issah K, Apanga PA, Bachan EG, Noora CL (2017) Factors influencing uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy using sulphadoxine pyrimethamine in Sunyani Municipality, Ghana. Pan African Med J 28. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.28/22.12611

  • Kayentao K, Garner P, van Eijk AM, Naidoo I, Roper C, Mulokozi A et al (2013) Intermittent preventive therapy for malaria during pregnancy using 2 vs 3 or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and risk of low birth weight in Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama 309(6):594–604. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.216231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D et al (2016) Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet 387(10018):587–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00837-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mama A, Ahiabor C, Tornyigah B, Frempong NA, Kusi KA, Adu B et al (2022) Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine and parasite resistance: cross-sectional surveys from antenatal care visit and delivery in rural Ghana. Malaria J 21(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04124-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MK, Venantius KB, Patricia N, Bernard K, Keith B, Allen K et al (2020) Correlates of uptake of optimal doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for prevention of malaria during pregnancy in East-Central Uganda. Malaria J 19(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03230-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mchwampaka WM, Tarimo D, Chacky F, Mohamed A, Kishimba R, Samwel A (2019) Factors affecting uptake of≥ 3 doses of Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine for malaria prevention in pregnancy in selected health facilities, Arusha region, Tanzania. BMC Preg Childbirth 19(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2592-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mlugu EM, Minzi O, Asghar M, Färnert A, Kamuhabwa AA, Aklillu E (2020) Effectiveness of sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria and adverse birth outcomes in pregnant women. Pathogens 9(3):207. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9030207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moore KA, Fowkes FJ, Wiladphaingern J, Wai NS, Paw MK, Pimanpanarak M et al (2017) Mediation of the effect of malaria in pregnancy on stillbirth and neonatal death in an area of low transmission: observational data analysis. BMC Med 15:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0863-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mpogoro FJ, Matovelo D, Dosani A, Ngallaba S, Mugono M, Mazigo HD (2014) Uptake of intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for malaria during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes: a cross-sectional study in Geita district, North-Western Tanzania. Malaria J 13(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mushi V, Mbotwa CH, Zacharia A, Ambrose T, Moshi FV (2021) Predictors for the uptake of optimal doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy in Tanzania: further analysis of the data of the 2015–2016 Tanzania demographic and health survey and malaria indicator survey. Malaria J 20(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03616-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odjidja EN, Duric P (2017) Evaluation of demand and supply predictors of uptake of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy in Malawi. Malariaworld Journal 8:20–20

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Okethwangu D, Opigo J, Atugonza S, Kizza CT, Nabatanzi M, Biribawa C et al (2019) Factors associated with uptake of optimal doses of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria among pregnant women in Uganda: analysis of data from the Uganda Demographic and Health Survey, 2016. Malaria J 18(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2883-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okoli CI, Hajizadeh M, Rahman MM, Khanam R (2021) Decomposition of socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in Nigeria: evidence from Demographic Health Survey. Malaria J 20(1):300. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03834-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onoka CA, Onwujekwe OE, Hanson K, Uzochukwu BS (2012) Sub-optimal delivery of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy in Nigeria: influence of provider factors. Malaria J 11(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oppong FB, Gyaase S, Zandoh C, Nettey OEA, Amenga-Etego S, Anane EA et al (2019) Intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women in Kintampo area of Ghana with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP): trends spanning 2011 and 2015. BMJ open 9(6):e027946. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027946

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Radeva-Petrova D, Kayentao K, ter Kuile FO, Sinclair D, Garner P (2014) Drugs for preventing malaria in pregnant women in endemic areas: any drug regimen versus placebo or no treatment. Cochrane Database System Rev, (10). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000169.pub3

  • Roman E, Wallon M, Brieger W, Dickerson A, Rawlins B, Agarwal K (2014) Moving malaria in pregnancy programs from neglect to priority: experience from Malawi, Senegal, and Zambia. Global Health: Sci Pract 2(1):55–71. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schantz-Dunn J, Nour NM (2009) Malaria and pregnancy: a global health perspective. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2(3):186

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith Paintain L, Antwi GD, Jones C, Amoako E, Adjei RO, Afrah NA et al (2011) Intermittent screening and treatment versus intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: provider knowledge and acceptability. PloS one 6(8):e24035. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen AAI, Wurapa F, Afari EA, Sackey SO, Malm KL, Nyarko KM (2016) Factors influencing utilization of intermittent preventive treatment for pregnancy in the Gushegu district, Ghana, 2013. Pan African Med J 25(Suppl 1). https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2016.25.1.6169

  • Tackie V, Seidu AA, Osei M (2021) Factors influencing the uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study. J Public Health 29:1205–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01234-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toure OA, Serge-Brice ASSI, Bedia VA, N’guessan LT, Aba TY, Zika KD et al (2021) Coverage and effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine during pregnancy in six sentinels sites of Cote dIvoire. J Parasitol Vector Biol 13(2):102–110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-014-0495-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (2004) A strategic framework for malaria prevention and control during pregnancy in the African region. Brazzaville, WHO Regional Office for Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (2015). Global technical strategy for malaria 2016-2030

  • World Health Organisation (2012) Evidence Review Group: Intermittent Preventive Treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine (SP), WHO Headquarters. Meeting report, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (2016). World malaria report 2016. Geneva, 

  • World Health Organisation (2018). Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp). Geneva.

  • World Health Organisation (2020). World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges

  • Yaya S, Uthman OA, Amouzou A, Bishwajit G (2018) Use of intermittent preventive treatment among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from malaria indicator surveys. Trop Med Infect Disease 3(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed3010018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaya S, Kota K, Buh A, Bishwajit G (2019) Antenatal visits are positively associated with uptake of tetanus toxoid and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy in Ivory Coast. BMC Public Health 19(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7847-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the academic staff of the Institute of Health Research (IHR) and Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) for their invaluable contribution to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Malaria (CMR), Institute of Health Research (IHR), University of Health and Allied Sciences (UHAS), PMB, 31, Volta Region, Ho, Ghana

    Desmond Klu

  2. Research and Innovation Division, National Development Planning Commission, Accra, Ghana

    Lily Owusu

Authors
  1. Desmond Klu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lily Owusu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.K. conceptualized, designed the study, obtained the data, analysed and interpreted the data. D.K. also drafted the entire manuscript and critically reviewed. D.K. and L.O. together revised and approved the revised manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desmond Klu.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical consideration

The Ethical Review Committee of Ghana Health Services and Institutional Review Board approved the protocol for the 2019 Ghana Malaria Indicator Survey which was collected and supervised by the Ghana Statistical Service. Informed consent was obtained from respondents before interviews were conducted. Again, all methods used were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and procedures.

Consent to participate

All participants gave verbal and written informed consent to participate in the study.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klu, D., Owusu, L. Factors affecting the uptake of optimal doses of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy using sulfadoxine pyrimethamine in Ghana: new evidence from the 2019 malaria indicator survey. J Public Health (Berl.) (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-02024-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-02024-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation