Skip to main content

Table 3 Previous attitude and subsequent attitude about relevant health myth grouped by myth and visual experimental condition

From: Debunking health myths on the internet: the persuasive effect of (visual) online communication

   previous attitude about relevant health myth (t1) subsequent attitude about relevant health myth (t2)
   belief in myth t1; M behaviour according to the myth t1; M feeling according to the myth t1; M belief in myth t2; M future behaviour according to the myth t2; M feeling according to the myth t2; M
  nose myth 3.70 3.12 3.00 2.76 2.41 2.67
  alcohol myth 3.45 2.28 2.63 2.51 1.97 2.35
  eye myth 3.95 3.72 3.45 2.72 2.52 2.65
  finger myth 3.62 3.07 3.22 2.56 2.64 2.62
nose myth no image 3.65 3.22 3.13 2.76 2.41 2.81
machine-technical image 3.58 3.04 2.86 2.84 2.32 2.55
  expert image 3.79 3.36 3.00 2.74 2.45 2.68
  diagram 3.81 2.85 2.85 2.69 2.48 2.64
alcohol myth no image 3.51 2.38 2.78 2.43 1.87 2.33
machine-technical image 3.38 2.08 2.42 2.43 1.82 2.14
  expert image 3.41 2.13 2.56 2.39 1.91 2.24
  diagram 3.50 2.54 2.79 2.76 2.28 2.69
eye myth no image 3.95 3.76 3.47 2.74 2.49 2.74
machine-technical image 3.88 3.51 3.45 2.74 2.50 2.64
  expert image 4.04 3.83 3.66 2.58 2.56 2.48
  diagram 3.92 3.77 3.23 2.81 2.52 2.76
finger myth no image 3.67 3.16 3.26 2.68 2.74 2.80
machine-technical image 3.59 2.84 3.00 2.42 2.53 2.45
  expert image 3.55 2.98 3.25 2.64 2.75 2.70
  diagram 3.68 3.31 3.38 2.50 2.53 2.53
  1. 5-point scale (1 = do not agree at all; 5 = agree completely)