Abstract
Aim
Little is known about how parents and children perform physical activity together. Parents are described as gate-keepers of children’s physical activity. We explored gate-keeping in cross-generational physical activity from child, parent, and family perspectives.
Methods
A qualitative methodology was employed. Children and parents took part in semi-structured focus groups, family unit interviews, and individual interviews. Data was analysed thematically.
Results
The starting of cross-generational physical activity involved co-construction. Participants were found to instigate and respond to invitations from their physical activity partners. Child participants were found to employ several strategies to influence their parents and open-the-gate on physical activity. In contrast, stopping cross-generational physical activity only required one participant to stop the physical activity for the physical activity to cease, and child participants volunteered no strategies to influence their parents during the stopping of cross-generational physical activity.
Conclusion
Children of this age group were not passive recipients of parental gate-keeping in cross-generational physical activity. Cross-generational recreation, sport, and exercise was co-constructed by interplay between the child and parent. Physical activity health promotion policy and practice should recognise and promote the roles that both children and parents plays in the instigation of, and engagement in cross-generational physical activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Australian social trends June 2011, sport and physical recreation (No 4102.0). Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra
Beets M, Cardinal B, Alderman B (2010) Parental social support and the physical activity related behaviours of youth: a review. Health Educ Behav 37:621–644
Belanger-Gravel A, Gauvin L, Lagarde F, Laferte M (2015) Correlates and moderators of physical activity in parent-tween dyads: a socio-ecological perspective. Pub Health 7:1218–1223
Bellows-Reicken K, Rhodes R (2008) A birth of inactivity? A review of physical activity and parenthood. Prev Med 46:99–110
Brockman R, Jago R, Fox K, Thompson J, Cartwright K, Page A (2009) ‘Get off the sofa and go and play’: Family and socio-economic influences on the physical activity of 10–11 year old children. BMC Pub Health 9:253–259
Bronfenbrenner U (1989) Ecological systems theory. Volume 6. JAI Press, Greenwich CT
Davison K, Cutting T, Birch L (2003) Parents’ activity-related parenting practices predict girls’ physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1589–1595
Dunton G, Liao Y, Almanza E, Jerrett M, Spruijt-Metz D, Chou C-P, Pentz A (2012) Joint physical activity and sedentary behavior in parent–child pairs. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44:1473–1480
Epstein L, Smith J, Vara L, Rodefer J (1991) Behavioural economic analysis of activity choice in obese children. Health Psychol 10:311–316
Fleming V, Gaidys U, Robb Y (2003) Hermeneutic research in nursing: developing a Gadamerian-based research method. Nurs Inq 10:113–120
Flurry L (2007) Children’s influence in family decision-making: examining the impact of the changing American family. J Bus Res 60:322–330
Guba E, Lincoln Y (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 105–107
Gustafson S, Rhodes R (2006) Parental correlates of physical activity in children and early adolescents. Sports Med 36:79–97
Haye K, de Heer H, Wilkinson A, Koehly L (2014) Predictors of parent-child relationships that support physical activity in Mexican-American families. J Behav Med 37:234–244
Hesketh K, Waters E, Green J, Salmon L, Williams J (2005) Healthy eating, activity and obesity prevention: a qualitative study of parent and child perceptions in Australia. Health Promot Int 20:19–26
Horstman M, Aldiss S, Richardson A, Gordon F (2008) Methodological issues when using the draw and write technique with children aged 6 to 12 years. Qual Health Res 18:1001–1011
James A, Jenks C, Prout A (1998) Childhood in social space. In: James A, Chris J, Prout A (eds) Theorizing childhood. Sage Publications, London, pp 37–58
Liamputtong P (2006) Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. Sage Publications, California
Martens L, Southerton D, Scott S (2004) Bringing children (and parents) into the sociology of consumption. J Cons Cult 4:155–182
Patton M (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, California
Prout A, James A (1990) A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? In: James A, Prout A (eds) Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. The Flamer Press, London, pp 7–31
Pugliese J, Tinsley B (2007) Parental socialization of child and adolescent physical activity: a meta-analysis. J Fam Psychol 21:331–343
Rhodes R, Naylor P, McKay H (2010) Pilot study of a family physical activity planning intervention among parents and their children. J Behav Med 33:91–100
Rhodes R, Lim C (2017) Promoting parent and child physical activity together: elicitation of potential intervention targets and preferences. Health Educ Behav 45(1):112-123
Schranz N, Olds T, Cliff D et al (2014) Results from Australia’s 2014 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health 11:S21–S25
Stanley R, Boshoff K, Dollman J (2013) A qualitative exploration of the ‘critical window’: factors affecting Australian children’s after-school physical activity. J Phys Act Health 10:33–41
Tremblay M (2014) Global summit on the physical activity of children. J Phys Act Health 11:S1–S2
United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (1989) Convention on the rights of the child. http://wwwohchrorg/en/professionalinterest/pages/crcaspx Accessed 21 June 2013
World Health Organisation (2004) Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health http://wwwwhoint/dietphysicalactivity/goals/en/ Accessed 22 June 2013
Wright M, Wilson D, Giffin S, Evans A (2010) A qualitative study of parent modelling and social support for physical activity in underserved adolescents. Health Educ Res 25:224–232
Yao C, Rhodes R (2015) Parental correlates in child and adolescent physical activity: a meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nut Phys Act 12:10
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank all the participants for sharing their experiences, the NSW Department of Education for permitting their schools to engage with the study, and each of the schools, both public and independent, for their engagement with the research.
Funding
the authors declare that no funding or grants were obtained for the study. The study was part of the corresponding author’s PhD program of research, which was funded by a scholarship from the university that the author is associated with.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freire, K., Coyle, J. & Pope, R. Exploring cross-generational physical activity: who are the gate-keepers?. J Public Health (Berl.) 27, 77–88 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-018-0927-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-018-0927-3