Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Direct reliability: strategies to revolutionize healthcare

  • Comment
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this article is to understand the current climate of high reliability in healthcare and explore comprehensive approaches to measure future healthcare transformation.

Subjects and methods

Literature pertaining to high reliability in industry and healthcare organizations was reviewed, with a focus on publications from 2006–present.

Results

Readiness assessments, components, frameworks and comparisons to external industries have been produced in the literature and discussed within healthcare expertise. High reliability in healthcare organizations remains opaque, with varied structures to recommendations, despite continued interest and accreditation focus. Advancing high-reliability science for healthcare has remained elusive.

Conclusion

Strategies to revolutionize healthcare utilizing reliability should be considered imperative opportunities. These strategies include conceptualizing high-reliability science for healthcare as holistic, incorporating recommended robust process improvements along all spectra of healthcare, standardizing criteria to constitute a high-reliability organization in healthcare and measuring high reliability qualitatively, with the understanding that avoided catastrophic failures should be factored, and emphasizing public trust in medicine as a priority for high reliability. Notably, patient satisfaction and patient perception of reliable healthcare must be included at the forefront. By harnessing these strategies, healthcare will move reliability from an indirect cultural philosophy to the direct, revolutionary spotlight. A spotlight on reliability is positive, commendable and important to honor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

There are no original data to aggregate or report.

Abbreviations

(AHRQ):

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

(CAS):

Complex adaptive system

(EBP):

Evidence-based practice

(HRO):

High-reliability organization

(HRT):

High-reliability theory

(NAT):

Normal accident theory

(RBI):

Robust process improvements

References

  • Baker DP, Day R, Salas E (2006) Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations. Health Serv Res 41:1576–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batterham AM, George KP (2000) Reliability in evidence-based clinical practice: a primer for allied health professionals. Phys Ther Sport 1:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DS, Donaldson N, Burnes Bolton L, Aydin CE (2010) Nursing-sensitive benchmarks for hospitals to gauge high-reliability performance. J Healthc Qual 32:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll JS, Rudolph JW (2006) Design of high reliability organizations in health care. Qual Saf Health Care 15(Suppl 1):i4–i9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassin MR, Loeb JM (2011) The ongoing quality improvement journey: next stop, high reliability. Health Aff 30:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassin MR, Loeb JM (2013) High-reliability health care: getting there from here. Milbank Q 91:459–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christianson MK, Sutcliffe KM, Miller MA, Iwashyna TJ (2011) Becoming a high reliability organization. Crit Care 15:314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon NM, Shofer M (2006) Struggling to invent high-reliability organizations in health care settings: insights from the field. Health Serv Res 41:1618–1632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel AS, Leonard MW, Denham CR (2006) Fair and just culture, team behavior, and leadership engagement: the tools to achieve high reliability. Health Serv Res 41:1690–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnanapragasam A, Cole C, Singh J, Cooper T (2018) Consumer perspectives on longevity and reliability: a national study of purchasing factors across eighteen product categories. Procedia CIRP 69:910–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall MA, Dugan E, Zheng B, Mishra AK (2001) Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? Milbank Q 79:613–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knox GE, Simpson KR (2011) Perinatal high reliability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:373–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachin JM (2004) The role of measurement reliability in clinical trials. Clin Trials 1:553–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez GF, Ross E, Knox KS (2017) Academic medicine: vice chairs’ for education perceptions of departmental culture. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice 17:81

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeon LM, Oswaks JD, Cunningham PD (2006) Safeguarding patients: complexity science, high reliability organizations, and implications for team training in healthcare. Clin Nurse Spec 20:298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeon LM, Cunningham PD, Oswaks JSD (2009) Improving patient safety: patient-focused, high-reliability team training. J Nurs Care Qual 24:76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk BM (2012) Achieving a high-reliability organization through implementation of the ARCC model for systemwide sustainability of evidence-based practice. Nurs Adm Q 36:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philibert I (2009) Use of strategies from high-reliability organisations to the patient hand-off by resident physicians: practical implications. Qual Saf Health Care 18:261–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Goeschel CA, Needham DM, Sexton JB, Thompson DA, Lubomski LH, Marsteller JA, Makary MA, Hunt E (2006) Creating high reliability in health care organizations. Health Serv Res 41:1599–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pronovost PJ, Demski R, Callender T, Winner L, Miller MR, Austin JM, Berenholtz SM, National Leadership Core Measures Work Groups (2013) Demonstrating high reliability on accountability measures at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 39:531–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pronovost PJ, Armstrong CM, Demski R, Callender T, Winner L, Miller MR, Austin JM, Berenholtz SM, Yang T, Peterson RR, Reitz JA, Bennett RG, Broccolino VA, Davis RO, Gragnolati BA, Green GE, Rothman PB (2015) Creating a high-reliability health care system: improving performance on core processes of care at Johns Hopkins medicine. Acad Med 90:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provost SM, Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, McDaniel RR Jr, Pugh J (2015) Health care huddles: managing complexity to achieve high reliability. Health Care Manag Rev 40:2–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prybil L, Scutchfield FD, Killian R, Kelly A, Mays GP, Carman A, Levey S, McGeorge A, Fardo DW (2014) Improving community health through hospital-public health collaboration: Insights and lessons learned from successful partnerships

  • Riley W, Davis SE, Miller KK, Mccullough M (2010) A model for developing high-reliability teams. J Nurs Manag 18:556–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts KH, Robert Bea, Dean L. Bartles (2001) Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organizations [and executive commentary]. The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005) 15:70–79

  • Shortell SM, Zukoski AP, Alexander JA, Bazzoli GJ, Conrad DA, Hasnain-Wynia R, Sofaer S, Chan BY, Casey E, Margolin FS (2002) Evaluating partnerships for community health improvement: tracking the footprints. J Health Polit Policy Law 27:49–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe KM, Paine L, Pronovost PJ (2017) Re-examining high reliability: actively organising for safety. BMJ Qual Saf 26:248–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamuz M, Harrison MI (2006) Improving patient safety in hospitals: contributions of high-reliability theory and normal accident theory. Health Serv Res 41:1654–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen Ø, Espeland A, Søfteland E, Lossius HM, Heltne JK, Brattebø G (2011) Implementation of checklists in health care; learning from high-reliability organisations. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19(53)

  • Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA, Salas E (2005) Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams. Qual Saf Health Care 14:303–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There are no funding contributions to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vallejo, USA

    Julie Babyar

Authors
  1. Julie Babyar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The author is the sole author of this manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

The author consents to publication of this article.

Competing interests

There are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babyar, J. Direct reliability: strategies to revolutionize healthcare. J Public Health (Berl.) 28, 89–95 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-018-01013-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-018-01013-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation