Erratum to: J Public Health (2016) 24:253–261
DOI 10.1007/s10389-016-0719-6
The original article contains an error in the following paragraph (page 258, column 1, paragraph 2):
Among the psychosocial professionals, 26 % (n = 5) considered values to have no influence on the counselling session; 47 % (n = 9) saw values as somewhat influential, 21 % (n = 4) estimated the influence rather high, and one person (5 %) considered values to have a very high influence on the counselling.
The corrected version should be:
Among the psychosocial professionals, no one considered values to have no influence at all on the counselling session; 26 % (n = 5) viewed values as somewhat not influential on the counselling session, 47 % (n = 9) saw values as somewhat influential, 21 % (n = 4) estimated the influence rather high, and one person (5 %) considered values to have a very high influence on the counselling.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10389-016-0719-6
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gschmeidler, B., Flatscher-Thöni, M. & Knitel-Grabher, E. Erratum to: Genetics in the medical and psychosocial practice: on the role of value hierarchies in counselling. J Public Health 25, 451 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-017-0807-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-017-0807-2