Health and living conditions in social housing: comparison between rehabilitated and non-rehabilitated neighbourhoods
- 278 Downloads
Our aim is to compare how residents from two social housing neighbourhoods of Porto City, one rehabilitated and one non-rehabilitated, perceived their living conditions, health and quality of life.
Subjects and methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted, selecting residents from two social housing neighbourhoods of Porto City, one rehabilitated and another one non-rehabilitated. The information was collected through quantitative (a structured questionnaire; n = 82) and qualitative face-to-face interviews administered by trained interviewers (n = 16).
No significant differences were found between populations from both neighbourhoods regarding social, behavioural and health characteristics. The major differences among neighbourhoods were found on variables such as satisfaction with house, the need of rehabilitation work, and the absence of mould and dampness in the house (p < 0.001) as well as pollution (p < 0.05). Qualitative data showed that residents from the rehabilitated houses were pleased not to have been moved to another location and were very satisfied with the rehabilitation work, which in their perception contributed to the residents’ wellbeing. Nominal and ordinal variables were described using proportions and compared using the chi-square test. Quantitative continuous variables were presented as a median (percentile 25 to percentile 75) and they were compared via the Mann-Whitney test.
Public economic and financing resources should be redirected to social housing rehabilitation that, although in the short term does not have a direct impact on health savings for the occupants, is an important dimension of the residents’ sense of wellbeing and satisfaction.
KeywordsSocial housing rehabilitation Neighbourhoods rehabilitation Quality of life Living conditions
Authors are grateful to DomusSocial, E.M. for availability and collaboration.
This work is supported by FEDER funding from the Operational Programme Factors of Competitiveness - COMPETE and by national funding from the FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology (Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science) within the project “Influence of Indoor Hygrothermal Conditions on Human Quality of Life in Social Housing” (ref. EXPL/ECM-COM/1999/2013-FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-041748). SF and SS acknowledge the FCT (SFRH/BPD/97015/2013 to SF and SFRH/BD/108742/2015 to SS). The ISPUP-EPIUnit, Universidade do Porto, Portugal (UID/DTP/04750/2013) is funded by the FCT.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Doman’ski H, Ostrowska A, Przybysz D, Romaniuk A, Krieger H (2006) First European quality of life survey: social dimensions of housing. Eurofound, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Eurofound (2006) Social dimensions of housing in the European Union. Eurofound, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Fernandes E, Jantunen M, Carrer P, O S, Harrison P, Kephalopoulos S (2009) EnVIE: co-ordination action on indoor air quality and health effects. http://cordis.europa.eu/documents/documentlibrary/126459681EN6.pdf. Accessed July 2016
- INE (2012) Censos 2011 resultados definitivos: região Norte. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, I.P., LisbonGoogle Scholar
- Jargowsky PA (2001) Sprawl, concentration of poverty, and urban inequality In: Squires G (ed) Urban sprawl: causes, consequences and policy responses. Urban Institute, Washington, DC, 47 ppGoogle Scholar
- Martin-Carrasco M, Evans-Lacko S, Dom G, Christodoulou NG, Samochowiec J, Gonzalez-Fraile E, Bienkowski P, Gomez-Beneyto M, Dos Santos MJ, Wasserman D (2016) EPA guidance on mental health and economic crises in Europe. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 266(2):89–124. doi: 10.1007/s00406-016-0681-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Milton S, Pliakas T, Hawkesworth S, Nanchahal K, Grundy C, Amuzu A, Casas JP, Lock K (2015) A qualitative geographical information systems approach to explore how older people over 70 years interact with and define their neighbourhood environment. Health Place 36:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.10.002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Popkin S, Cunningham M (2002) CHA relocation counseling assessment final report. The Urban Institute, Metropolitan Housing and Communities Center, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis Software. Version 10, 2013Google Scholar
- Soloman R (2005) Public housing reform and voucher success: progress and challenges. The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Thomson H, Petticrew M, Morrison D (2001) Health effects of housing improvement: systematic review of intervention studies. 323(7306):187-190 doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.187
- Wilkinson D (1999) Poor housing and Ill health: a summary of research evidence. The Scottish Office, EdinburghGoogle Scholar