Predictive utility of the NEO-FFI for later substance experiences among 16-year-old adolescents

Abstract

Purpose

The onset of substance use mostly occurs during adolescence. The aim of the present study is to investigate the relevance of personality on the basis of the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) to future experiences with tobacco, alcohol and cannabis.

Methods

The test data were derived from the baseline assessment and first follow-up of the IMAGEN study, a European multicenter and multidisciplinary research project on adolescent mental health. In the present study 1004 participants were tested. The characterization of personality was conducted with the NEO-FFI at the age of 14 (T1). The data on substance use were collected with the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD) questionnaire at the age of 16 (T2). For the statistical analysis, t-tests and univariate analyses of variance were performed.

Results

The scores of Conscientiousness at T1 were significantly lower for adolescents with tobacco, alcohol and cannabis experiences at T2. We found lower scores of Agreeableness at T1 in participants with tobacco and cannabis use at T2. Extraversion at T1 was significantly higher for adolescents with smoking experiences at T2. No significant associations between Neuroticism or Openness and future substance use were observed.

Conclusion

Low scores of Conscientiousness and Agreeableness seem to have the greatest value for a prediction of later experiences with substance use. As the present study is the first one to examine the predictive value of the NEO-FFI for future substance use in an adolescent sample, further studies are necessary to enable a better applicability in a clinical context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Battistella G, Fornari E, Annoni JM, Chtioui H, Dao K, Fabritius M, Favrat B, Mall JF, Maeder P, Giroud C (2014) Long-term effects of cannabis on brain structure. Neuropsychopharmacology 39(9):2041–2048. doi:10.1038/npp.2014.67

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (2008) Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 57(45):1226–1228

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark A, Tran C, Weiss A, Caselli G, Nikcevic AV, Spada MM (2012) Personality and alcohol metacognitions as predictors of weekly levels of alcohol use in binge drinking university students. Addict Behav 37(4):537–540. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Sousa KR, Tiwari AK, Giuffra DE, Mackenzie B, Zai CC, Kennedy JL (2013) Age at onset of schizophrenia: cannabis, COMT gene, and their interactions. Schizophr Res 151(1–3):289–290. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.10.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DeWit DJ, Adlaf EM, Offord DR, Ogborne AC (2000) Age at first alcohol use: a risk factor for the development of alcohol disorders. Am J Psychiatry 157(5):745–750

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dierker L, Selya A, Piasecki T, Rose J, Mermelstein R (2013) Alcohol problems as a signal for sensitivity to nicotine dependence and future smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend 132(3):688–693. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.03.018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fridberg DJ, Vollmer JM, O’Donnell BF, Skosnik PD (2011) Cannabis users differ from non-users on measures of personality and schizotypy. Psychiatry Res 186(1):46–52. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.07.035

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallinat J, Meisenzahl E, Jacobsen LK, Kalus P, Bierbrauer J, Kienast T, Witthaus H, Leopold K, Seifert F, Schubert F, Staedtgen M (2006) Smoking and structural brain deficits: a volumetric MR investigation. Eur J Neurosci 24(6):1744–1750. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05050.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grant JD, Scherrer JF, Lynskey MT, Lyons MJ, Eisen SA, Tsuang MT, True WR, Bucholz KK (2006) Adolescent alcohol use is a risk factor for adult alcohol and drug dependence: evidence from a twin design. Psychol Med 36(1):109–118. doi:10.1017/S0033291705006045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hibell B, Andersson B, Ahlström S, Balakireva O, Bjarnason T, Kokkevi A, Morgan M (2000) The 1999 ESPAD report. Alcohol and other drug use among students in 30 European Countries. The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hibell B, Andersson B, Bjarnason T, Ahlström S, Balakireva O, Kokkevi A, Morgan M (2004) The ESPAD report 2003. Alcohol and other drug use among students in 35 European countries. The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hinckers AS, Laucht M, Schmidt MH, Mann KF, Schumann G, Schuckit MA, Heinz A (2006) Low level of response to alcohol as associated with serotonin transporter genotype and high alcohol intake in adolescents. Biol Psychiatry 60(3):282–287. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.12.009

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hyman SM, Sinha R (2009) Stress-related factors in cannabis use and misuse: implications for prevention and treatment. J Subst Abus Treat 36(4):400–413. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kandel D, Yamaguchi K (1993) From beer to crack: developmental patterns of drug involvement. Am J Public Health 83(6):851–855

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhn S, Romanowski A, Schilling C, Mobascher A, Warbrick T, Winterer G, Gallinat J (2012) Brain grey matter deficits in smokers: focus on the cerebellum. Brain Struct Funct 217(2):517–522. doi:10.1007/s00429-011-0346-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malouff JM, Thorsteinsson EB, Rooke SE, Schutte NS (2007) Alcohol involvement and the Five-Factor model of personality: a meta-analysis. J Drug Educ 37(3):277–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McCann SJ (2010) Subjective well-being, personality, demographic variables, and American state differences in smoking prevalence. Nicotine Tob Res 12(9):895–904. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McCrae RR, John OP (1992) An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Pers 60(2):175–215

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pluess M, Bartley M (2015) Childhood conscientiousness predicts the social gradient of smoking in adulthood: a life course analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 69(4):330–338. doi:10.1136/jech-2014-204263

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Prescott CA, Kendler KS (2001) Early age at first alcoholic drink. Am J Psychiatry 158(9):1530

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Salujha SK, Chaudhury S, Menon PK, Srivastava K, Gupta A (2014) Allelic variants of ADH, ALDH and the five factor model of personality in alcohol dependence syndrome. Ind Psychiatry J 23(1):44–51. doi:10.4103/0972-6748.144956

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Schumann G, Loth E, Banaschewski T, Barbot A, Barker G, Buchel C, Conrod PJ, Dalley JW, Flor H, Gallinat J, Garavan H, Heinz A, Itterman B, Lathrop M, Mallik C, Mann K, Martinot JL, Paus T, Poline JB, Robbins TW, Rietschel M, Reed L, Smolka M, Spanagel R, Speiser C, Stephens DN, Strohle A, Struve M, and The IMAGEN consortium (2010) The IMAGEN study: reinforcement-related behaviour in normal brain function and psychopathology. Mol Psychiatry 15(12):1128–1139. doi:10.1038/mp.2010.4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vollrath ME, Torgersen S (2008) Personality types and risky health behaviors in Norwegian students. Scand J Psychol 49(3):287–292. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00631.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Waga C, Iwahashi K (2007) CYP2A6 gene polymorphism and personality traits for NEO-FFI on the smoking behavior of youths. Drug Chem Toxicol 30(4):343–349. doi:10.1080/01480540701522338

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Whelan R, Watts R, Orr CA, Althoff RR, Artiges E, Banaschewski T, Barker GJ, Bokde AL, Buchel C, Carvalho FM, Conrod PJ, Flor H, Fauth-Buhler M, Frouin V, Gallinat J, Gan G, Gowland P, Heinz A, Ittermann B, Lawrence C, Mann K, Martinot JL, Nees F, Ortiz N, Paillere-Martinot ML, Paus T, Pausova Z, Rietschel M, Robbins TW, Smolka MN, Strohle A, Schumann G, Garavan H, The IMAGEN consortium (2014) Neuropsychosocial profiles of current and future adolescent alcohol misusers. Nature 512(7513):185–189. doi:10.1038/nature13402

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Woicik PA, Stewart SH, Pihl RO, Conrod PJ (2009) The Substance Use Risk Profile Scale: a scale measuring traits linked to reinforcement-specific substance use profiles. Addict Behav 34(12):1042–1055. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zvolensky MJ, Taha F, Bono A, Goodwin RD (2015) Big five personality factors and cigarette smoking: a 10-year study among US adults. J Psychiatr Res. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.02.008

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work received support from the following sources: the European Union-funded FP6 Integrated Project IMAGEN (Reinforcement-related behaviour in normal brain function and psychopathology) (LSHM-CT- 2007–037286), the FP7 projects IMAGEMEND (602450; IMAgingGEnetics for MENtal Disorders) and MATRICS (603016), the Innovative Medicine Initiative Project EU-AIMS (115300–2), a Medical Research Council Programme Grant “Developmental pathways into adolescent substance abuse” (93558), the Swedish funding agency FORMAS, the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust (Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge), the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF grants 01GS08152; 01EV0711; eMED SysAlc01ZX1311A;Forschungsnetz AERIAL), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG grants SM 80/7-1, SM 80/7-2, SFB 940/1) and the National Institutes of Health, USA (Axon, Testosterone and Mental Health during Adolescence; RO1 MH085772-01A1).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juergen Gallinat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parchetka, C., Strache, N., Raffaelli, B. et al. Predictive utility of the NEO-FFI for later substance experiences among 16-year-old adolescents. J Public Health 24, 489–495 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-016-0747-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Personality
  • Five-factor model of personality
  • NEO-FFI
  • Substance use