Abstract
Aim
The aim of this paper is to provide a summary of the present state of discussion concerning a way forward for public health programming that is more empowering and more effective at achieving its goals as we move into the future.
Method
A discussion expressing the views of the author supported by the relevant literature drawn from a wide range of sources on public health programming.
Discussion
The first part of the paper discusses the present state of public health programming and why it has had only modest success in achieving its goals. The second part discusses why the planning of public health programmes in the future will have to take into account at least three important agendas. The third part of the paper discusses why the delivery of public health programming in the future will have to include the following design elements: engage communities to share priorities; build community capacity; mechanisms for flexible funding; evaluate sharing information and ideas; be creative to expand on successful local initiatives.
Conclusion
The paper concludes with a reflection on the most rational way forward and on the role of practitioners in achieving a more empowering and effective public health. The paper will be of interest to the planners and evaluators of public health programmes interested in improving the effectiveness of public health.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson E, Shepard M, Salisbury C (2006) ‘Taking off the suit’: engaging the community in primary health care decision-making. Health Expect 9:70–80
Baum F (2007) Cracking the nut of health equity: top down and bottom up pressure for action on the social determinants of health. International Union for Health Promotion and Education 14(2):90–95
Bernier N (2007) Public health program resilience and policy trajectories: a comparison of three provinces. In: O’Neill M et al (ed) Public health in Canada: critical perspectives. Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc, Toronto
Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2006) Recommendations for future efforts in community public health. Regional expert panel on community public health. Atlanta, USA
Commonwealth of Australia (2000) Promoting practical sustainability. AusAID, Canberra
Confederation of British Industry (CBI) (2006) Transforming Local Services. Confederation of British Industry Brief. London. July 2006
CORE Group (2005) ‘Scale’ and ‘Scaling-up’: a CORE Group background paper on ‘Scaling-up’ Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Services. The World Bank, Washington DC, July 2005
Diamond J (1997) Guns, germs and steel: the fates of human societies. W.W. Norton, New York
Earle L, Fozilhujaev B, Tashbaeva C, Djamankulova K (2004) Community development in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan. Occasional paper number 40. INTRAC, Oxford
Freudenberg N (1997) Public health in the city. Atlanta. USA. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention
Gangolli LV, Duggal R, Shukla A (eds) (2005) Review of Health Care in India. CEHAT, Mumbai
Gee D (2008) Park Scheme seeks more ‘friends’. The Christchurch Press. www.bush.org.nz/library/934.html. accessed 3/4/2008
Gibbon M, Labonte R, Laverack G (2002) Evaluating community capacity. Health Soc Care Community 10(6):485–491
Green L, Kreuter M (1991) Public health planning. An educational and environmental approach. Mayfield Publishing Company, Toronto
Kickbusch I (2002) The future of public health. http://info.med.yale.edu/eph/pdf/The%20Future%20of%20Health%20Promotion.pdf. Accessed 16/8/2007
Labonte R, Laverack G (2008) Public health in action: from local to global empowerment. Palgrave Macmillan, London
Laverack G (2004) Public health practice: power and empowerment. Sage Publications, London
Laverack G (2008) The future of public health programming. Workshop presentation: empowerment for public health: global experiences, German perspectives. Munich 21/1/2008
Liew T (2007) Glen Innes household needs assessment. University of Auckland, New Zealand
Ministry of Health (MoH, NZ) (2003) Project to counter stigma and discrimination associated with mental illness. National Plan 2003–2005. Wellington, New Zealand
Nutbeam D (2000) Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Public Health International 15(3):259–267
Papa MJ, Singhal A, Papa WH (2006) Organizing for social change: a dialectic journey of theory and praxis. Sage Publications, London
Renewal.net (2008) resolving differences-building communities and Aik saath: conflict resolution peer group facilitators. Renewal.net case studies. http://www.renewal.net/Documents/RNET/. Accessed 29/4/2008
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority (SRHA) (2005) Saskatoon ‘In motion’: five years in the making. Saskatchewan. Saskatoon Regional Health Authority
Syme L (1997) Individual vs community interventions in public health practice: some thoughts about a new approach. Vichealth Letter (2):2–9, July
Wanless D (2003) Securing good health for the whole population: population health trends. HMSO, London
Wharf-Higgins J, Naylor PJ, Day M (2007) Seed funding for public health: sowing sustainability or scepticism? Community Dev J 1–12, Advance access January 31, 2007
World Health Organisation (WHO) (1986) Ottawa Charter for Public Health. WHO, Geneva
Conflict of interest
The author discloses any relevant associations that might pose a conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laverack, G. The future of public health programming. J Public Health 17, 281–286 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-008-0237-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-008-0237-2