Abstract
Germany enabled public long-term care insurance (LTCI), a social insurance system, in 1995. This study focuses on the LTCI program in Germany, analyzes progress of LTCI in view of economic indicators in the inland 16 states (“Länder” in Germany), categorizes 16 states, and describes problems concerning the LTCI program. Statistical analysis was conducted using 24 variables of LTCI and the economic index. The 16 states were categorized in five clusters. The results revealed gaps in adoption rates of LTCI care services among 16 states, suggesting that each of the states developed its own service system of LTCI dependent on regional variables such as economic power and size of population. All former East German states tended to have lower economic resources of care. States with many requests for cash benefits tended to offer lower amounts of care services. The characteristics of these 16 states provide useful information for developing LTCI policies in Germany and offer an informative guide to other countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AOK–Bundesverband 9/1999
Bartholomeyczik S, Hunstein D (2004) Time distribution of selected care activities in home care in Germany. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13:97–104
Cohen MA, Kumar N, McGuire T, Wallack SS (1992) Financing long-term care: a practical mix of public and private. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 17(3):403–423
Cuellar AE, Wiener JM (2000) Can social insurance for long-term care work? The experience of Germany. Health Affairs 19(3):8–25
Evers A (1998) The new long-term care insurance program in Germany. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 10(1):77–98
Garms–Homolova V (1994) Comprehensive health for the aged and initiatives for an insurance for care in Germany. Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften 1:26–38
Götting U, Haug K, Hinrichs K (1994) The long road to long-term care insurance in Germany. Journal of Public Policy 14(3):285–309
Grupp J, Richter H, Wolfsdorf K (1992) Die Ableitung der neuen Pflegefallwahrscheinlichkeiten für die Pflegerentenversicherung. Blätter der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Versicherungsmathematik 10:517–534
Halsig N (1995) Hauptpflegepersonen in der Familie: Eine Analyse ihrer situativen Bedingungen, Belastungen und Hilfsmöglichkeiten. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie und -psychiatrie 4:247–262
Kinderknecht CH (1989) Aging women and long-term care: truth and consequences. Journal of Women & Aging 1(4):71–91
Kohli M, Künemund H, Motel A, Szydlik M (2000) Generationenbeziehungen. In: Kohli M, Künemund H (eds). Die zweite Lebenshälfte: Gesellschaftliche Lage und Partizipation im Spiegel des Alters-Survey, Leske and Budrich, pp 176–211
PV–Statistik (PG 1) 2000
SGB XI Soziale Pflegeversicherung
Statistische Landesämter 2001
Scharf T (2001) Ageing and intergenerational relationships in rural Germany. Ageing and Society 21:547–566
Scheiwe K (1997) New demands for social protection - changing family structures, women's roles and institutional responses: The case of the German long-term care insurance. Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung (MZES), Arbeitspapiere Arbeitsbereich 1/19
Schmähl W, Rothgang H (1996) The long-term costs of public long-term care insurance in Germany. Some Guesstimates. In Eisen R and Sloane FA (eds) Long-term care: economic issues and policy solutions, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 181–222
Schulz E, König HH (2004) The impact of aging on hospital care and long-term care - the example of Germany. Health Policy 67:57–74
Statistisches Bundesamt 2003, Bevölkerung Deutschlands bis 2050
Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland 2002
Tsuchida T (1997) German care insurance system in Nowadays. Aging and Work 16(2):4–12
Uhlenberg P (1992) Population aging and social policy. Annual Review of Sociology 18:449–474
Wagner A (2002) Einfluss von Pflegebiographie und Demographischem Wandel auf die Entwicklung der sozialen Pflegeversicherung. Die Krankenversicherung 54:332–335
Wegner EL (2001) Restructuring care for the elderly in Germany. Current Sociology 49(3):175–188
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Prof. Takeshi Tsuchida (Waseda University, Japan), Prof. James W. Vaupel (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Germany), Prof. Kiyohide Fushimi (Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan), and Prof. Shinichi Sato (Meiji Gakuin University, Japan) for their encouragement and helpful comments on this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sato, E. Long-term care insurance in Germany: analyzing its progress from the perspective of economic indicators. J Public Health 14, 7–14 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-005-0003-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-005-0003-7