Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gut microbiome can predict chemoradiotherapy efficacy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The gut microbiome plays an important role in cancer pathogenesis and therapy. Some studies have reported that specific bacteria in tumor tissues may contribute to the prognosis and treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, there is limited evidence that the gut microbiome is associated with ESCC. This study assessed the utility of the gut microbiome as a predictive marker of the therapeutic effect in patients with ESCC undergoing chemo-radiotherapy (CRT).

Patients and methods

Fecal samples were collected from 51 patients with ESCC who had never undergone treatment between April 2021 and May 2022 in the Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba University. The gut microbiome was analyzed using 16S metagenomics sequencing. The association between the gut microbiome composition and stage according to the TNM classification (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7.0) and CRT response according to the RECIST criteria was evaluated.

Results

The relative abundance of Fusobacteriaceae was enriched in cStage III-IVb group. Among the 27 patients who received CRT, the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae was enriched in those with a partial and complete response. Lactobacillaceae also did not correlate with any clinical data, but the high Lactobacillales group had a higher LMR (P = 0.032) and lower PLR (P = 0.045) than in the low Lactobacillales group.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we found that the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae was enriched in patients with a partial or complete response among CRT those with ESCC, thus suggesting that the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae can predict the effect of CRT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Oesophago-gastric cancer: assesment and management in adults. NICE guideline [NG83]. 2023.

  2. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJH, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL, van Laarhoven HWM, Nieuwenhujizen GAP, Hospers GAP, Bonenkamp JJ, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for esophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC, Marnay J, Henry Amar M, Petiot JF, Roussel A, Jacob JH, Segol P, Samama G, et al. Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer. 1994;73:2680–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oppedijk V, Van Der Gaast A, Van Lanschot JJB, Van Hagen P, Van Os R, Van Rij CM, Van Der Sangen MJ, Beukema JC, Ruẗten H, Spruit PH, et al. Patterns of recurrence after surgery alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the CROSS trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:385–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barbour AP, Walpole ET, Mai GT, Barnes EH, Watson DI, Ackland SP, Martin JM, Burge M, Finch R, Karapetis CS, et al. Preoperative cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel with or without radiotherapy after poor early response to cisplatin and fluorouracil for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma (AGITG DOCTOR): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:236–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lang CCJ, Lloyd M, Alyacoubi S, Rahman S, Pickering O, Underwood T, Breininger SP. The use of miRNAs in predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy in oesophageal cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:1171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McColl KE. Clinical practice. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1597–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arthur JC, Perez-Chanona E, Muhlbauer M, Tomkovich S, Uronis JM, Fan TJ, et al. Intestinal inflammation targets cancer-inducing activity of the microbiota. Science. 2012;338:120–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Garrett WS. Cancer and the microbiota. Science. 2015;348:80–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwabe RF, Jobin C. The microbiome and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:800–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamura K, Baba Y, Nakagawa S, Mima K, Miyake K, Nakamura K, et al. Human microbiome fusobacterium nucleatum in esophageal cancer tissue is associated with prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:5574–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamura K, Izumi D, Kandamalla R, Sonohara F, Yoshifumi B, Yoshida N, et al. Intratumoral Fusobacterium nucleatum levels predict therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:6170–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Flores R, Shi J, Fuhrman B, Xu X, Veenstra TD, Gail MH, et al. Fecal microbial determinants of fecal and systemic estrogens and estrogen metabolites: a cross-sectional study. J Transl Med. 2012;10:253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwa M, Plottel CS, Blaser MJ, Adams S. The intestinal microbiome and estrogen receptor- positive female breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108:8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pushalkar S, Hundeyin M, Daley D, Zambirinis CP, Kurz E, Mishra A, et al. The pancreatic cancer microbiome promotes oncogenesis by induction of innate and adaptive immune suppression. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:403–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen W, Tang D, Deng Y, Li H, Wang T, Wan P, et al. Association of gut microbiomes with lung and esophageal cancer: a pilot study. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;37:128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deng Y, Tang D, Hou P, Shen W, Li H, Wang T, et al. Dysbiosis of gut microbiota in patients with esophageal cancer. Microb Pathog. 2021;150: 104709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y, Guo H, Gao X, Wang J. The intratumor microbiota signatures associate with subtype, tumor stage, and survival status of esophageal carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 754788.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheung MK, Yue GGL, Lauw S, Li CSY, Yung MY, Ng SC, et al. Alterations in gut microbiota of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;37:1919–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rios-Covian D, Gueimonde M, Duncan SH, Flint CG, de los Reyes-Gavilan. Enhanced butyrate formation by cross-feeding between Faecalibacterium and Bifidobacterium adolescentis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu X, Wu Y, He L, Wu L, Wang X, Liu Z. Effects of the intestinal microbial metabolite butyrate on the development of colorectal cancer. J Canc. 2018;9:2510–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Natoni F, Diolordi L, Santoni C, Gilardini Montani MS. Sodium butyrate sensitises human pancreatic cancer cells to both the intrinsic and the extrinsic apoptotic pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2005;1745:318–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen AK, Venema K, Reijngoud DJ, Bakker BM. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:2325–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang Y, Xu D, Song H, Qiu B, Tian D, Li Z, et al. Inflammation and nutrition-based biomarkers in the prognosis of oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e048324.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen X, Winckler B, Lu M, Cheng H, Yuan Z, Yang Y, et al. Oral microbiota and risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a high-risk area of China. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0143603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang KK, He KY, Yang JY, Liu MJ, Guo JR, Liang JY, et al. Lactobacillus suppresses tumorigenesis of oropharyngeal cancer via enhancing anti-tumor immune response. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10: 842153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao K, Wang C, Shi F, Li M, Yu J. Lymphocyte-monocyte ratio as a predictive marker for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Transl Cancer Res. 2020;9:3842–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu Y, Chen J, Zhao L, Li Q, Zhu J, Yang H, et al. Prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma incorporating hematological biomarkers. Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53:172–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee KH, Kim EY, Yun JS, Park YL, Do SI, Chae SW, et al. The prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and hematologic parameters in patients with breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:938.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Keiko Iida (Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba university graduate school of medicine) for assistance with the Ion Torrent library preparation and sequencing. And also, we thank Akiko Suganami and Yutaka Tamura (Department of Bioinformatics, Chiba university graduate school of medicine) for help our statistical analysis.

Funding

This work was supported by JPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 20H03749.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasunori Matsumoto.

Ethics declarations

Ethical statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the ethics committee of Chiba University Hospital and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent or substitute for it was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1468 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sasaki, T., Matsumoto, Y., Murakami, K. et al. Gut microbiome can predict chemoradiotherapy efficacy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophagus 20, 691–703 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-01004-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-01004-0

Keywords

Navigation