Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characteristics of patients with esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry and esophagography—a large database analysis in Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

With the development of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and peroral endoscopy, more patients with esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) including achalasia are diagnosed and treated. The characteristics of Japanese patients with EMDs are unknown and should be elucidated.

Methods

A large-scale database analysis was performed at seven high-volume centers in Japan. EMDs between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed.

Results

A total of 1900 patients were diagnosed with treatment naïve achalasia on esophagography. A long disease history was related to the sigmoid and dilated esophagus, and patients’ symptom severity declined as achalasia progressed to the sigmoid type.

Among 1700 patients received starlet HRM, 1476 (86.8%) completed the examination. Long disease history and sigmoid achalasia were identified as risk factors for the failure of HRM examination. Type I achalasia was the most common type found on starlet HRM, and 45.1% of patients with achalasia had lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure within the normal range. Type III had a high age of onset and mild symptom severity, compared to the other two subtypes. Type III achalasia, esophagogastric outflow obstruction (EGJ-OO), jackhammer esophagus (JE), and diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) were relatively rare compared to type I–II achalasia. The clinical characteristics of EGJ-OO, JE, and DES were generally close to those of achalasia.

Conclusion

This first large-scale database analysis indicates that more Japanese patients with achalasia are type I and have a normal range of LES pressure on starlet HRM. Failure of HRM is not rare; therefore, esophagography continuously has a complementary role in achalasia diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farrokhi F, Vaezi MF. Idiopathic (primary) achalasia. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sato H, Yokomichi H, Takahashi K, et al. Epidemiological analysis of achalasia in Japan using a large-scale claims database. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:621–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(Suppl 1):57–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, et al. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1526–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Japan Esophageal Society. Descriptive rules for achalasia of the esophagus. Esophagus. 2017;14(4):275–89.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010;42:265–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shiwaku H, Inoue H, Sato H, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a prospective multicenter study in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:1037–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee Y, Brar K, Doumouras AG, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of pediatric achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:1710–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Inoue H, Shiwaku H, Iwakiri K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for peroral endoscopic myotomy. Dig Endosc. 2018;30:563–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Albers D, Frieling T, Dakkak D, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is effective in treatment of noncardiac chest pain caused by hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders: results of the POEM-HYPE-Study. Z Gastroenterol. 2018;56:1337–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chandan S, Mohan BP, Chandan OC, et al. Clinical efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for spastic esophageal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:707–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):160–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuribayashi S, Iwakiri K, Kawada A, et al. Variant parameter values-as defined by the Chicago Criteria-produced by ManoScan and a new system with Unisensor catheter. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:188–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Iwakiri K, Hoshihara Y, Kawami N, et al. The appearance of rosette-like esophageal folds (“esophageal rosette”) in the lower esophagus after a deep inspiration is a characteristic endoscopic finding of primary achalasia. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45(4):422–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eckardt VF, Aignherr C, Bernhard G. Predictors of outcome in patients with achalasia treated by pneumatic dilation. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:1732–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, et al. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:27–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati RH, et al. ACG Clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of Achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:1393–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sato H, Takahashi K, Mizuno K-i, et al. Esophageal motility disorders: new perspectives from high-resolution manometry and histopathology. J gastroenterol. 2018;53:484–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sodikoff JB, Lo AA, Shetuni BB, et al. Histopathologic patterns among achalasia subtypes. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28:139–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicodeme F, de Ruigh A, Xiao Y, et al. A comparison of symptom severity and bolus retention with Chicago classification esophageal pressure topography metrics in patients with achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:131–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kahrilas PJ, Boeckxstaens G. The spectrum of achalasia: lessons from studies of pathophysiology and high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:954–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ponds FA, Bredenoord AJ, Kessing BF, et al. Esophagogastric junction distensibility identifies achalasia subgroup with manometrically normal esophagogastric junction relaxation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Ho K, et al. Unique features of esophagogastric junction pressure topography in hiatus hernia patients with dysphagia. Surgery. 2010;147:57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanaka Y, Ihara E, Nakamura K, et al. Clinical characteristics associated with esophageal motility function. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31:1133–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kawami N, Hoshino S, Hoshikawa Y, et al. Validity of the cutoff value for integrated relaxation pressure used in the starlet high-resolution manometry system. J Nippon Med sch. 2019;86:327–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roman S, Kahrilas PJ. Distal esophageal spasm. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31:328–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Roman S, Pandolfino JE, Chen J, et al. Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT). Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:37–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Hoeij FB, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:1310–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiaki Sato.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

Ethics committee approval was obtained from each facility (Tohoku University Hospital Approval No 2020–1-060) and was conducted according to the tenets set by the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained in the form of an opt-out system on a website.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 1105 kb)

Supplementary file2 (PPTX 946 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sato, C., Sato, H., Kamei, T. et al. Characteristics of patients with esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry and esophagography—a large database analysis in Japan. Esophagus 19, 182–188 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-021-00875-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-021-00875-5

Keywords

Navigation