Skip to main content
Log in

Tear protein analysis in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction treated with lacrimal passage intubation

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The pathophysiology of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) may involve quantitative as well as qualitative changes in tears. We measured tear protein concentrations in patients with primary acquired NLDO and compared them with the tear proteins in healthy individuals and patients with dry eye disease.

Study Design

Case–control study.

Methods

Twenty-four patients diagnosed with primary acquired NLDO who underwent endoscopic lacrimal passage intubation were included in the study. Tear fluid was collected with Schirmer’s test strips three times: before intubation, after intubation while the nasolacrimal tube was in place, and after extubation. At the same time, 24 age-matched normal controls and 24 patients with dry eye were selected from subjects whose tears were collected during the same study period. We measured the following components of tear fluid: total protein, lactoferrin, albumin, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels.

Results

Total proteins and albumin levels in tears of the NLDO group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.014, respectively, Mann–Whitney U test). Total proteins, albumin, and lactoferrin levels were significantly increased after extubation of nasolacrimal tube (P < 0.001, P = 0.004, and P = 0.029, respectively, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test). There were no statistically significant differences in total protein, albumin, lactoferrin and IL-6 levels between patients with NLDO after lacrimal passage extubation and controls.

Conclusions

Our study shows distinct differences in protein composition of tear fluid in NLDO eyes and demonstrates that these can be normalized by nasolacrimal tube placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Park DI, Lew H, Lee SY. Tear meniscus measurement in nasolacrimal duct obstruction patients with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography: novel three-point capture method. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:783–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohtomo K, Ueta T, Fukuda R, Usui T, Miyai T, Shirakawa R, et al. Tear meniscus volume changes in dacryocystorhinostomy evaluated with quantitative measurement using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:2057–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koh S, Inoue Y, Ochi S, Takai Y, Maeda N, Nishida K. Quality of vision in eyes with epiphora undergoing lacrimal passage intubation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;181:71–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Acera A, Suárez T, Rodríguez-Agirretxe I, Vecino E, Durán JA. Changes in tear protein profile in patients with conjunctivochalasis. Cornea. 2011;30:42–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pflugfelder SC, Solomon A, Dursun D, Li DQ. Dry eye and delayed tear clearance: “a call to arms.” Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506(Pt B):739–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lew H, Lee SY, Yun YS. Measurement of pH, electrolytes and electrophoretic studies of tear proteins in tears of patients with dacryoliths: a novel concept for dacryoliths. Ophthalmologica. 2004;218:130–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JK, Kim TH. Changes in cytokines in tears after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Eye (Lond). 2014;28:600–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsumura N, Goto S, Uchio E, Nakajima K, Fujita T, Kadonosono K. Cytokine profiles of tear fluid from patients with pediatric lacrimal duct obstruction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:252–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fullard RJ, Snyder C. Protein levels in nonstimulated and stimulated tears of normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:1119–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fullard RJ, Tucker DL. Changes in human tear protein levels with progressively increasing stimulus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:2290–301.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Danjo Y, Lee M, Horimoto K, Hamano T. Ocular surface damage and tear lactoferrin in dry eye syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol. 1994;72:433–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bjerrum KB. The ratio of albumin to lactoferrin in tear fluid as a diagnostic tool in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol. 1997;75:507–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Runstrom G, Mann A, Tighe B. The fall and rise of tear albumin levels: a multifactorial phenomenon. Ocul Surf. 2013;11:165–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Versura P, Bavelloni A, Blalock W, Fresina M, Campos EC. A rapid standardized quantitative microfluidic system approach for evaluating human tear proteins. Mol Vis. 2012;18:2526–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Versura P, Bavelloni A, Grillini M, Fresina M, Campos EC. Diagnostic performance of a tear protein panel in early dry eye. Mol Vis. 2013;19:1247–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Versura P, Nanni P, Bavelloni A, Blalock WL, Piazzi M, Roda A, et al. Tear proteomics in evaporative dry eye disease. Eye (Lond). 2010;24:1396–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Perumal N, Funke S, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH. Proteomics analysis of human tears from aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye patients. Sci Rep. 2011;6:29629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaffney EA, Tiffany JM, Yokoi N, Bron AJ. A mass and solute balance model for tear volume and osmolarity in the normal and the dry eye. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:59–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dartt DA. Regulation of mucin and fluid secretion by conjunctival epithelial cells. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002;21:555–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Willcox MDP, Argüeso P, Georgiev GA, Holopainen JM, Laurie GW, Millar TJ, et al. TFOS DEWS II tear film report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:366–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shimazaki J, Tsubota K, Kinoshita S, Ohashi Y, Shimomura Y, Tagawa Y, et al. Definition and diagnosis of dry eye. Atarashii Ganka. 2007;4:181–4 ((in Japanese)).

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Bijsterveld OP. Diagnostic tests in the Sicca syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969;82:10–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yaginuma S, Akune Y, Shigeyasu C, Takano Y, Yamada M. Tear protein analysis in presumed congenital alacrima. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2591–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu H, Chauhan A. Tear dynamics model. Curr Eye Res. 2007;32:177–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cerretani CF, Radke CJ. Tear dynamics in healthy and dry eyes. Curr Eye Res. 2014;39:580–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pearce EI, Tomlinson A, Craig JP, Lowther GE. Tear protein levels following punctal plugging. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;438:669–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sambursky R, Davitt WF, Latkany R, Tauber S, Starr C, Friedberg M, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of a point-of-care matrix metalloproteinase 9 immunoassay for diagnosing inflammation related to dry eye. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:24–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fischbarg J. Water channels and their roles in some ocular tissues. Mol Aspects Med. 2012;33:638–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Levin MH, Verkman AS. Aquaporin-dependent water permeation at the mouse ocular surface: in vivo microfluorimetric measurements in cornea and conjunctiva. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:4423–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Levin MH, Kim JK, Hu J, Verkman AS. Potential difference measurements of ocular surface Na+ absorption analyzed using an electrokinetic model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:306–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou L, Zhao SZ, Koh SK, Chen L, Vaz C, Tanavde V, et al. In-depth analysis of the human tear proteome. J Proteomics. 2012;75:3877–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Azkargorta M, Soria J, Acera A, Iloro I, Elortza F. Human tear proteomics and peptidomics in ophthalmology: toward the translation of proteomic biomarkers into clinical practice. J Proteomics. 2017;150:359–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Boehm N, Funke S, Wiegand M, Wehrwein N, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH. Alterations in the tear proteome of dry eye patients-a matter of the clinical phenotype. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:2385–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wei Y, Gadaria-Rathod N, Epstein S, Asbell P. Tear cytokine profile as a noninvasive biomarker of inflammation for ocular surface diseases: standard operating procedures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:8327–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Enríquez-de-Salamanca A, Castellanos E, Stern ME, Fernández I, Carreño E, García-Vázquez C, et al. Tear cytokine and chemokine analysis and clinical correlations in evaporative-type dry eye disease. Mol Vis. 2010;16:862–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant (19FA1010) from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masakazu Yamada.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

S. Yaginuma, None; K. Konno, Lecture fee (Santen, Otsuka); C. Shigeyasu, Lecture fee (Santen, Otsuka); M. Yamada, Lecture fee (Santen, Senju, Otsuka, Johnson & Johnson).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Corresponding Author: Masakazu Yamada

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yaginuma, S., Konno, K., Shigeyasu, C. et al. Tear protein analysis in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction treated with lacrimal passage intubation. Jpn J Ophthalmol 65, 409–415 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-020-00804-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-020-00804-6

Keywords

Navigation