Advertisement

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

, Volume 62, Issue 2, pp 226–230 | Cite as

Safety and reliability of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery for Japanese eyes

  • Hiroko Bissen-MiyajimaEmail author
  • Manabu Hirasawa
  • Kunihiko Nakamura
  • Yuka Ota
  • Keiichiro Minami
Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the safety and efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in Japanese eyes.

Study design

Retrospective case series.

Methods

The clinical records of 529 consecutive eyes of 312 Japanese patients who underwent FLACS from 2013 to 2016 were reviewed. The completion rates of anterior capsulotomy and corneal incisions using the femtosecond laser (LenSx, Alcon) and the number of attempts to achieve secure docking between the cornea and laser system were recorded. The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities (VAs) and uncorrected and distance-corrected near VAs 1 week postoperatively were evaluated.

Results

Anterior capsulotomies were completed in 98.7% of eyes. The corneal incisions were incomplete in 8.3%, which included eyes with arcus senilis and neovascularization. The mean corneal endothelial cell reduction rate was 5.5%. Multiple docking attempts were required in 22.9% of eyes, while canthotomy was performed in two eyes. The postoperative VAs were favorable.

Conclusion

FLACS was safe and reliable in Japanese eyes. Further improvements in docking are required to accommodate small corneas and narrow palpebral spaces.

Keywords

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract sugery Capsulotomy Lens fragmentation Corneal incision 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

H. B. -Miyajima, Grant (Abbot Medical Optics, Alcon, Santen Pharmaceutical), Lecture fees (Abbot Medical Optics, Alcon, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, HOYA, Kowa, Santen Pharmaceutical, Senju Pharmaceutical); M. Hirasawa, Grant (Alcon, AMO, Santen Pharmaceutical), Lecture fees (Alcon, AMO, Senju Pharmaceutical); K. Nakamura, Grant (Abbott Medical Optics, Alcon Laboratories), Consultant fee (HOYA); Y. Ota, Grant (Alcon, AMO, Santen Pharmaceutical), K. Minami, Grant (Abbot Medical Optics, Alcon, Santen Pharmaceutical), Consultant fees (Abbot Medical Optics, Alcon), Writing fees (Abbot Medical Optics, Chuo Sangio).

References

  1. 1.
    Nagy Z, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Sarayba M. Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:1053–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Mattei PA, Vecchiarino L, Mastropasqua A, Navarra R, et al. Optical coherence tomography and 3-dimensional confocal structured imaging system-guided femtosecond laser capsulotomy versus manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:2035–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kránitz K, Takacs A, Miháltz K, Kovács I, Knorz MC, Nagy ZZ. Femtosecond laser capsulotomy and manual continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis parameters and their effects on intraocular lens centration. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:558–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krarup T, Holm LM, la Cour M, Kjaerbo H. Endothelial cell loss and refractive predictability in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with conventional cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:617–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yoo A, Yun S, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Tchah H. Femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy versus toric IOL implantation for correcting astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:574–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abell RG, Darian-Smith E, Kan JB, Allen PL, Ewe SY, Vote BJ. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery: outcomes and safety in more than 4000 cases at a single center. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:47–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Day AC, Gore DM, Bunce C, Evans JR. Laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;7:CD010735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Popovic M, Campos-Möller X, Schlenker MB, Ahmed II. Efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with manual cataract surgery: a meta-analysis of 14 567 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:2113–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen X, Xiao W, Ye S, Chen W, Liu Y. Efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification for cataract: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chee SP, Yang Y, Ti SE. Clinical outcomes in the first two years of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:714–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hickson-Curran S, Brennan NA, Igarashi Y, Young G. Comparative evaluation of Asian and white ocular topography. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:1396–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Asano-Kato N, Toda I, Hori-Komai Y, Takano Y, Tsubota K. Risk factors for insufficient fixation of microkeratome during laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:47–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braga-Mele R, Chang D, Dewey S, Foster G, Henderson BA, Hill W, et al. ASCRS Cataract Clinical Committee. Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:313–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Asena BS, Kaskaloglu M. Laser-assisted cataract surgery: soft lens assisted interface (SoftFit) versus direct contact interface. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016;26:242–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pantanelli SM, Diakonis VF, Al-Mohtaseb Z, Cabot F, Yesilirmak N, Kounis GA, et al. Anterior capsulotomy outcomes: a comparison between two femtosecond laser cataract surgery platforms. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:821–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Titiyal JS, Kaur M, Singh A, Arora T, Sharma N. Comparative evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification in white cataract. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1357–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nagy ZZ, Takacs AI, Filkorn T, Kránitz K, Gyenes A, Juhász É, et al. Complications of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:20–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roberts TV, Lawless M, Bali SJ, Hodge C, Sutton G. Surgical outcomes and safety of femtosecond laser cataract surgery: a prospective study of 1500 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:227–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roberts TV, Lawless M, Sutton G, Hodge C. Anterior capsule integrity after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1109–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Conrad-Hengerer I, Al Juburi M, Schultz T, Hengerer FH, Dick HB. Corneal endothelial cell loss and corneal thickness in conventional compared with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: three-month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:1307–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chua WH, Tan D, Chan WK. Performance of the Hansatome microsuction ring for laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with narrow palpebral apertures. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2344–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mursch-Edlmayr AS, Bolz M, Luft N, Ring M, Kreutzer T, Ortner C, et al. Intraindividual comparison between femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:215–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyTokyo Dental College Suidobashi HospitalTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations