Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the progression and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy during and after pregnancy in patients with diabetes.
Methods
We checked the medical records of the patients with diabetes who were referred to the Diabetes Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan), and were pregnant between August 2004 and September 2010. The patients whose ophthalmic examinations records could not be found (n = 15) were excluded, and thus 93 patients (type 1 = 68, type 2 = 25) were included in the analyses. Data were obtained from the medical record and evaluated.
Results
The mean pre-pregnancy HbA1c was 7.1 ± 0.8 %. All patients were encouraged to maintain HbA1c level of under 7.4 % before pregnancy. At baseline, the percentage of patients with no retinopathy was 78 %, with nonproliferative retinopathy 14 %, and with proliferative retinopathy, 8 %. Progression of retinopathy occurred in 16 (17 %) patients. Two (2 %) had loss of visual acuity and 1 (1 %) underwent laser treatment due to progression of retinopathy. Compared with patients who did not show progression, the patients with progression were characterized by longer duration of diabetes (p < 0.00001), presence of diabetic retinopathy before pregnancy (p < 0.00001) and higher blood pressure in the second trimester (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Frequent ophthalmic examination, especially in patients with a long history of diabetes, is recommended, as well as for patients with presence of diabetic retinopathy before pregnancy. In contrast to previous reports, the progression of retinopathy in this study was lower. This is probably due to our patients’ pre-pregnancy tight glucose control and the high ratio of patients with no retinopathy at baseline.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Klein BE, Moss SE, Klein R. Effect of pregnancy on progression of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 1990;13:34–40.
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of pregnancy on microvascular complications in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1084–91.
Axer-Siegel R, Hod M, Fink-Cohen S, Kramer M, Weinberger D, Schindel B, et al. Diabetic retinopathy during pregnancy. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1815–9.
Chew EY, Mills JL, Metzger BE, Remaley NA, Jovanovic-Peterson L, Knopp RH, et al. Metabolic control and progression of retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:631–7.
Temple RC, Aldridge VA, Sampson MJ, Greenwood RH, Heyburn PJ, Glenn A. Impact of pregnancy on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2001;18:573–7.
Vestgaard M, Ringholm L, Laugesen CS, Rasmussen KL, Damm P, Mathiesen ER. Pregnancy-induced sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in women with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2010;27:431–5.
Rahman W, Rahman FZ, Yassin S, Al-Suleiman SA, Rahman J. Progression of retinopathy during pregnancy in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;35(3):231–6.
Matthews DR, Stratton IM, Aldington SJ, Holman RR, Kohner EM. Risks of progression of retinopathy and vision loss related to tight blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus—UKPDS 69. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1631–40.
Chan WC, Lim LT, Quinn MJ, Knox FA, McCance D, Best RM. Management and outcome of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy. Eye. 2004;18:826–32.
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Eng J Med. 1993;329:977–86.
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:874–86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
J. Toda, None; S. Kato, None; M. Sanaka, None; S. Kitano, None.
About this article
Cite this article
Toda, J., Kato, S., Sanaka, M. et al. The effect of pregnancy on the progression of diabetic retinopathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 60, 454–458 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-016-0464-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-016-0464-y