Skip to main content

Age-related differences in corneal epithelial thickness measurements with anterior segment optical coherence tomography

Abstract

Purpose

To measure corneal epithelial thickness (CET) in healthy adults and to investigate its variation with age by use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Methods

A total of 210 healthy individuals were enrolled and divided into four, almost equally sized groups on the basis of age: 18–29 years (group 1), 30–44 years (group 2), 45–59 years (group 3), and 60–80 years (group 4). The CET and total corneal thickness in the central area (diameter 6.0 mm) of each patient were obtained by Fourier-domain OCT, and the regional thickness and topographic variability were compared among the age groups. In addition, the correlations between the CET and age, gender, and refractive status were analyzed using partial correlation tests and multiple regression analysis.

Results

The CET of the central segment (diameter 2 mm) in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 53.74 ± 3.82, 54.48 ± 3.33, 53.89 ± 3.73, and 53.30 ± 3.36 µm, respectively, demonstrating no significant change with age (P = 0.416). In most of the paracentral and all of the midperipheral zones (annuli 2–5 and 5–6 mm from the center, respectively), the CET differed significantly among the four groups. Correlation analysis suggested that the CET is greater in men than in women and that the CET of both the paracentral and the midperipheral zones is inversely correlated with age. Topographic variability was also inversely correlated with age.

Conclusions

The CET became thinner with age in the paracentral and midperipheral zones, while the central CET seems to remain constant. Gender differences should be considered in the assessment of CET.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:571–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. In vivo three-dimensional corneal epithelium imaging in normal eyes by anterior-segment optical coherence tomography: a clinical reference study. Cornea. 2013;32:1493–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness in keratoconus: three-dimensional display with artemis very-high frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:259–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Corneal epithelial thickness profile in the diagnosis of keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:604–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Y, Tan O, Brass R, Weiss JL, Huang D. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping by fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2425–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong J, Qian T, Yang Y, Jiang C, Liu Z, Sun X, et al. Corneal epithelial thickness map in long-term soft contact lenses wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:1455–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui X, Hong J, Wang F, Deng SX, Yang Y, Zhu X, et al. Assessment of corneal epithelial thickness in dry eye patients. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:1446–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. In vivo 3-dimensional corneal epithelial thickness mapping as an indicator of dry eye: preliminary clinical assessment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(63–8):e2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan EH, Chen L, Yu F, Deng SX. Epithelial thinning in limbal stem cell deficiency. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(669–77):e4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ma XJ, Wang L, Koch DD. Repeatability of corneal epithelial thickness measurements using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and post-LASIK eyes. Cornea. 2013;32:1544–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Reinstein DZ, Yap TE, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH. Comparison of corneal epithelial thickness measurement between Fourier-domain OCT and very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:438–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Li HF, Petroll WM, Moller-Pedersen T, Maurer JK, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Epithelial and corneal thickness measurements by in vivo confocal microscopy through focusing (CMTF). Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:214–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel S, McLaren J, Hodge D, Bourne W. Normal human keratocyte density and corneal thickness measurement by using confocal microscopy in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:333–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Niederer RL, Perumal D, Sherwin T, McGhee CN. Age-related differences in the normal human cornea: a laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1165–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Francoz M, Karamoko I, Baudouin C, Labbé A. Ocular surface epithelial thickness evaluation with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:9116–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang Y, Hong J, Deng SX, Xu J. Age-related changes in human corneal epithelial thickness measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:5032–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimmyo M, Ross AJ, Moy A, Mostafavi R. Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:603–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang X, Dong J, Wu Q. Corneal thickness, epithelial thickness and axial length differences in normal and high myopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Suzuki S, Suzuki Y, Iwase A, Araie M. Corneal thickness in an ophthalmologically normal Japanese population. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1327–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta PD, Johar K Sr, Nagpal K, Vasavada AR. Sex hormone receptors in the human eye. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:274–84.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Giuffre G, Di Rosa L, Fiorino F, Bubella DM, Lodato G. Variations in central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle in women. Cornea. 2007;26:144–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hahn S, Azen S, Ying-Lai M, Varma R, Los Angeles Latino Eye Study G. Central corneal thickness in Latinos. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1508–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, KhabazKhoob M, Mohammad K, Parsafar H, et al. Corneal thickness in a population-based, cross-sectional study: the Tehran Eye Study. Cornea. 2009;28:395–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cho P, Lam C. Factors affecting the central corneal thickness of Hong Kong-Chinese. Curr Eye Res. 1999;18:368–74.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aghaian E, Choe JE, Lin S, Stamper RL. Central corneal thickness of Caucasians, Chinese, Hispanics, Filipinos, African Americans, and Japanese in a glaucoma clinic. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2211–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Prasad A, Fry K, Hersh PS. Relationship of age and refraction to central corneal thickness. Cornea. 2011;30:553–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weinreb RN, Lu A, Beeson C. Maternal corneal thickness during pregnancy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;105:258–60.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Affinito P, Sardo AD, Di Carlo C, Sammartino A, Tommaselli GA, Bifulco G, et al. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on ocular function in postmenopause. Menopause. 2003;10:482–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang SW, Tsai IL, Hu FR, Lin LL, Shih YF. The cornea in young myopic adults. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:916–20.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Dickeson ZI, Gobbe M. Transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy protocol for treating irregular astigmatism based on population epithelial thickness measurements by artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:380–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography: assisted topographic corneal epithelial thickness distribution imaging of a keratoconus patient. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2013;4:74–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Davanger M, Evensen A. Role of the pericorneal papillary structure in renewal of corneal epithelium. Nature. 1971;229:560–1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cotsarelis G, Cheng SZ, Dong G, Sun TT, Lavker RM. Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells. Cell. 1989;57:201–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zheng T, Xu J. Age-related changes of human limbus on in vivo confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2008;27:782–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Miri A, Al-Aqaba M, Otri AM, Fares U, Said DG, Faraj LA, et al. In vivo confocal microscopic features of normal limbus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:530–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang CY, Green CR, McGhee CN, Sherwin T. Acute wound healing in the human central corneal epithelium appears to be independent of limbal stem cell influence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5279–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chang CY, McGhee JJ, Green CR, Sherwin T. Comparison of stem cell properties in cell populations isolated from human central and limbal corneal epithelium. Cornea. 2011;30:1155–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Azartash K, Kwan J, Paugh JR, Nguyen AL, Jester JV, Gratton E. Pre-corneal tear film thickness in humans measured with a novel technique. Mol Vis. 2011;17:756–67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Aranha Dos Santos V, Schmetterer L, Groschl M, Garhofer G, Schmidl D, Kucera M, et al. In vivo tear film thickness measurement and tear film dynamics visualization using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. 2015;23:21043–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hosaka E, Kawamorita T, Ogasawara Y, Nakayama N, Uozato H, Shimizu K, et al. Interferometry in the evaluation of precorneal tear film thickness in dry eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(18–23):e1.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ahn JM, Lee SH, Rim TH, Park RJ, Yang HS, Kim TI, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors associated with dry eye: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2011. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(1205–14):e7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Uchino M, Schaumberg DA, Dogru M, Uchino Y, Fukagawa K, Shimmura S, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among Japanese visual display terminal users. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1982–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: H I 15C2237).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun Woong Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

B. J. Kim, None; I. –H. Ryu, None; S. W. Kim, None.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10384_2016_457_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Distribution of the mean corneal stromal thickness in each age group. The grey sectors indicate no significant difference in regional thickness among the age groups (1-way ANOVA test) (TIFF 5167 kb)

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, B.J., Ryu, IH. & Kim, S.W. Age-related differences in corneal epithelial thickness measurements with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol 60, 357–364 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-016-0457-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-016-0457-x

Keywords

  • Age
  • Anterior OCT
  • Corneal epithelial thickness
  • Corneal thickness
  • Stromal thickness