Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of graft–host interface after penetrating keratoplasty using anterior segment optical coherence tomography

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the characteristics of the graft–host interface after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).

Methods

Forty-nine eyes of 49 patients with three different underlying diseases (corneal scar, 22 eyes; bullous keratopathy, 14 eyes; keratoconus, 13 eyes) who underwent PKP were retrospectively reviewed. AS-OCT was performed in all patients and wound profiles of the graft–host junctions were classified into well-apposed junction, gap, step, and protrusion. The correlations between clinical characteristics and wound profiles from the AS-OCT were analyzed.

Results

A total of 392 graft–host junctions from 49 eyes were analyzed. Among them, 155 sections (39.5 %) had well-apposed junctions and 237 sections (60.5 %) had malapposed junctions. The most frequent type of malapposition was protrusion (117 sections, 39.9 %). When categorizing the eyes according to the most frequent alignment type among the 8 cross-sections, the alignment pattern showed significant differences between the preoperative diagnosis groups (P = 0.04). Spherical equivalent (P = 0.04) and keratometric astigmatism (P < 0.01) showed significant differences between the alignment groups. Graft–host thickness disparities showed significant correlations with keratometric astigmatism (r = 0.56, P < 0.01) and degree of graft oversize (r = 0.29, P = 0.04).

Conclusions

The alignment pattern of wound interface after PKP differed according to the clinical diagnosis before surgery and was significantly associated with spherical equivalent and keratometric astigmatism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morrison JC, Swan KC. Descemet’s membrane in penetrating keratoplasties of the human eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:1927–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, Hodge DO, Boume WM. Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1855–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Farid M, Kim M, Steinert RF. Results of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zigzag incision initial report. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2208–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Binder PS. The effect of suture removal on postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;105:637–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Troutman RC, Lawless MA. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Cornea. 1987;6:298–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lim L, Pesudovs K, Coster DJ. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual outcome and success. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1125–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mader TH, Yuan R, Lynn MJ. Changes in keratometric astigmatism after suture removal more than one year after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:119–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Polack FM, Binder PS. Detachment of Descemet’s membrane from grafts following wound separation: light and scanning electron microscopic study. Ann Ophthalmol. 1975;7:47–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jancevski M, Foster CS. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Semin Ophthalmol. 2010;25:317–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramos JL, Li Y, Huang D. Clinical and research applications of anterior segment optical coherence tomography—a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009;37:81–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim LS, Aung HT, Aung T, Tan DT. Corneal imaging with anterior segment optical coherence tomography for lamellar keratoplasty procedures. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:81–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohamed S, Lee GK, Rao SK, Wong AL, Cheng AC, Li EY, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of pachymetric mapping with Visante anterior segment-optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5499–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sayegh RR, Pineda R. Practical applications of anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging following corneal surgery. Semin Ophthalmol. 2012;27:130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaiserman I, Bahar I, Rootman DS. Corneal wound malapposition after penetrating keratoplasty: an optical coherence tomography study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:1103–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jhanji V, Constantinou M, Beltz J, Vaipayee RB. Evaluation of posterior wound profile after penetrating keratoplasty using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2011;30:277–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lang GK, Green WR, Maumenee AE. Clinicopathologic studies of keratoplasty eyes obtained post mortem. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:28–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Garner A. Corneal wound healing. In: Casey TA, Mayer DG, editors. Corneal grafting. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1984. p. 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by the Chonnam National University Biomedical Research Institute (CRI 13906-22) and Forest Science and Technology Projects (Project No. S121313L050100) provided by Korea Forest Service.

Conflicts of interest

M. S. Sung, None; K. C. Yoon, None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung Chul Yoon.

About this article

Cite this article

Sung, M.S., Yoon, K.C. Evaluation of graft–host interface after penetrating keratoplasty using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol 58, 282–289 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-014-0309-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-014-0309-5

Keywords

Navigation