Skip to main content

Glaucoma diagnosis optic disc analysis comparing Cirrus spectral domain optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomograph II

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic ability of optic nerve head parameters, measured by Cirrus spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) and Heidelberg retina tomograph II (HRT II) to detect concomitant glaucoma.

Methods

Cirrus OCT and HRT examinations of 62 eyes of 62 patients (32 with no perimetric glaucoma and 30 with concomitant perimetric glaucoma) evaluated between August 2010 and December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with regard to the optic disc morphometric parameter, disc area, rim area, cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), and cup volume. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed for the parameters and areas under the curves (AUCs) were compared.

Results

All parameters except disc area were significantly different between Cirrus OCT and HRT. Average cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), vertical CDR, and cup volume were greater when measured by OCT compared with HRT II (P = 0.002, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Rim area was smaller by OCT than by HRT II (P < 0.001). Of the parameters evaluated, rim area (0.938), average CDR (0.865), and vertical CDR (0.897) had higher AUCs with OCT than with HRT II. Glaucoma diagnostic capability using the AUC was greater for OCT than for the HRT.

Conclusions

Optic nerve head parameters measured by Cirrus OCT seem to be useful in differentiating glaucomatous optic nerve heads. The two types of instrument compared here should not be used interchangeably to obtain measurements of the optic disc for diagnosis of glaucoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, Qiu Q, Liu S, Li H, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1257–63.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Quigley HA, Katz J, Derick RJ, Gilbert D, Sommer A. An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:19–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, Miller NR, Robin AL, Richter RC, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:77–83.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Miglior S, Casula M, Guareschi M, Marchetti I, Iester M, Orzalesi N. Clinical ability of Heidelberg retinal tomograph examination to detect glaucomatous visual field changes. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1621–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lee S, Sung KR, Cho JW, Cheon MH, Kang SY, Kook MS. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry in glaucoma diagnosis. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54:544–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sharma A, Oakley JD, Schiffman JC, Budenz DL, Anderson DR. Comparison of automated analysis of Cirrus HD OCT spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with stereo photographs of the optic disc. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1348–57.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mwanza J-C, Oakley JD, Budenz DL, Anderson DR. Ability of Cirrus HD-OCT optic nerve head parameters to discriminate normal from glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:241–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Shpak AA, Sevostyanova MK, Ogorodnikova SN, Shormaz IN. Comparison of measurement error of Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg retina tomograph 3 in patients with early glaucomatous visual field defect. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250:271–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Weinreb RN. Laser scanning tomography to diagnose and monitor glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1993;4:3–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Budenz DL, Fredette MJ, Feuer WJ, Anderson DR. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:661–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Knight OJ, Chang RT, Feuer WJ, Budenz DL. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1271–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sehi M, Grewal DS, Sheets CW, Greenfield DS. Diagnostic ability of Fourier-domain vs time-domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma detection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:597–605.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cense B, Chen TC, Nassif N, Pierce MC,Yun SH, Park BH, et al. Ultra-high speed and ultra-high resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and optical Doppler tomography in ophthalmology. Bull Soc Belg Ophthalmol. 2006:123–32.

  16. 16.

    Vihanninjoki K, Tuulonen A, Burk RO, Airaksinen PJ. Comparison of optic disc measurements by Heidelberg retina tomograph and manual planimetric techniques. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:512–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Vessani RM, Susanna R Jr, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:44–55.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shoji T, Sato H, Ishida M, Takeuchi M, Chihara E. Assessment of glaucomatous changes in subjects with high myopia using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;52:1098–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chan Kee Park.

About this article

Cite this article

Shin, H.Y., Park, HY.L., Jung, K.I. et al. Glaucoma diagnosis optic disc analysis comparing Cirrus spectral domain optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomograph II. Jpn J Ophthalmol 57, 41–46 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-012-0205-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cirrus spectral domain optical coherence tomography
  • Glaucoma
  • Optic nerve head analysis
  • Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy imaging