Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of refractive changes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare refractive changes occurring after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in patients with keratoconus.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 57 patients with keratoconus who received DALK (19 eyes of 19 patients) or PKP (38 eyes of 38 patients) before and after surgery between January 1996 and January 2008, in an effort to evaluate the surgical results and clinical courses. The principal outcome measures were as follows: preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, and corneal topography including anterior chamber depth (ACD).

Results

We noted no significant difference between the DALK and PKP groups in terms of postoperative UCVA, BCVA, astigmatism, or donor-recipient graft size disparities. For the PKP and DALK groups, the mean postoperative spheres were −1.64 D and −4.29 D at 6 months (P = 0.01) and −2.73 D and −4.22 D at 12 months, respectively (P = 0.04). Postoperative mean central corneal powers (3.0/5.0 mm zone) were 45.01/45.03 D and 46.94/47.84 D, respectively (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02). ACD after surgery was 3.25 and 3.37 mm at the final follow-up, respectively (P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Although DALK is a safe alternative in cases of keratoconus, the DALK group evidenced significantly higher myopia than did the PKP group, which was related to steeper central corneal power and deeper ACD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watson SL, Ramsay A, Dart JK, Bunce C, Craig E. Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1676–1682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Funnell CL, Ball J, Noble BA. Comparative cohort study of the outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye (Lond) 2006;20:527–532.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coombes AG, Kirwan JF, Rostron CK. Deep lamellar keratoplasty with lyophilised tissue in the management of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:788–791.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Park KA, Ki CS, Chung ES, Chung TY. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in Korean patients with Avellino dystrophy. Cornea 2007;26:1132–1135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones MN, Armitage WJ, Ayliffe W, Larkin DF, Kaye SB. Penetrating and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus: a comparison of graft outcomes in the United kingdom. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:5625–5629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Han DC, Mehta JS, Por YM, Htoon HM, Tan DT. Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:744–751, e741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Srinivasan S, Ya-Ping J, Slomovic AR, Rootman DS. Comparison of three different techniques of corneal transplantation for keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:905–912, e901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rice A, Funnell CL, Pesudovs K, Noble BA, Ball JL. Mid-term outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Eye (Lond) 2009;23:2263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fogla R, Padmanabhan P. Results of deep lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:254–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fontana L, Parente G, Tassinari G. Clinical outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:117–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arentsen JJ. Corneal transplant allograft reaction: possible predisposing factors. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1983;81:361–402.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Archila EA. Deep lamellar keratoplasty dissection of host tissue with intrastromal air injection. Cornea 1984;3:217–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Perry HD, Foulks GN. Oversize donor buttons in corneal transplantation surgery for keratoconus. Ophthalmic Surg 1987;18:751–752.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson SE, Bourne WM. Effect of recipient-donor trephine size disparity on refractive error in keratoconus. Ophthalmology 1989; 96:299–305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaycock PD, Jones MN, Males J, et al. Outcomes of same-sizing versus oversizing donor trephines in keratoconic patients undergoing first penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2008;115:268–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Klein AP, Suktitipat B, Duggal P, et al. Heritability analysis of spherical equivalent, axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:649–655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:472–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae-Young Chung.

Additional information

A shorter version of this paper was presented as a poster at the Korean Ophthalmological Society 97th Spring Meeting, April 2007, Pusan, Korea.

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, KH., Choi, SH., Ahn, K. et al. Comparison of refractive changes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Jpn J Ophthalmol 55, 93–97 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-010-0914-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-010-0914-x

Keywords

Navigation