Skip to main content

Comparing myopic progression of urban and rural Taiwanese schoolchildren

Abstract

Purpose

To compare myopic progression rates in Taiwanese schoolchildren between urban and rural areas.

Methods

Several longitudinal studies of myopic progression were performed in urban and rural areas. Five primary schools, four junior high schools, and two senior high schools were selected from both urban and rural areas. Ages ranged from 7 to 18 years. The refractive state of each student was measured with an autorefractometer under cycloplegia.

Results

Mean myopic progression in primary school children (ages 7 to 12) in the urban areas was around 0.20 D/year for boys and 0.27 D/year for girls. The mean myopic progression rate in urban children from primary to junior high school age (ages 10 to 15) was 0.43 D/year for boys and 0.50 D/year for girls, faster than that in rural children (0.24 and 0.31 D/year, respectively). The average progression rate was fastest in children in junior high school (ages 13 to 15), around 0.45 D/year in urban areas and 0.28 D/year in rural areas. In senior high schools (ages 16 to 18), myopic progression slowed to 0.17 D/ year in boys and 0.33 D/year in girls. Myopic progression in all groups was faster in myopic eyes than in emmetropic or hyperopic eyes.

Conclusions

The average myopic progression in urban areas was greater than that in rural areas. Environmental factors such as urban development and academic grade level may be important contributing factors to myopic progression.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Fan DS, Lam DS, Lam RF, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and progression of myopia of school children in Hong Kong. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1071–1075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Watanabe S, Yamashita T, Ohba N. A longitudinal study of cycloplegic refraction in a cohort of 350 Japanese schoolchildren. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999;19:22–29.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lin LLK, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ. Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren, 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004;33:27–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lin LLK, Shih YF, Tsai CB, et al. Epidemiologic study of ocular refraction among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:275–281.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lin LLK, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ, Lee LA, Hung PT. Epidemiologic study of the prevalence and severity of myopia among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 2000. J Formos Med Assoc 2001;100:684–691.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chow YC, Dhillon B, Chew PT, et al. Refractive errors in Singapore medical students. Singapore Med J 1990;31:472–473.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lin LLK, Shih YF, Lee YC, Hung PT, Hou PK. Changes in ocular refraction and its components among medical students-a 5-year longitudinal study. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:495–498.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Loman J, Quinn GE, Kamoun L, et al. Darkness and near work: myopia and its progression in third-year law students. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1032–1038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Parssinen O, Lyyra AL. Myopia and myopic progression among schoolchildren: a three-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:2794–2802.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Goss DA, Rainey BB. Relation of childhood myopia progression rates to time of year. J Am Optom Assoc 1998;69:262–266.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Saw SM, Chua WH, Gazzard G, Koh D, Tan DTH, Stone RA. Eye growth changes in myopic children in Singapore. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1489–1494.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Saw SM, Neito FJ, Katz J, Schein OD, Levy B, Chew SJ. Factors related to the progression of myopia in Singaporean children. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:549–554.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rose KA, Morgan IG, Smith W, Burlutsky G, Mitchell P, Saw SM. Myopia, lifestyle, and schooling in students of Chinese ethnicity in Singapore and Sydney. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:527–530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1279–1285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    McCarthy CS, Megaw P, Devadas M, Morgan IG. Dopaminergic agents affect the ability of brief periods of normal vision to prevent form-deprivation myopia. Exp Eye Res 2007;84:100–107.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lam CSY, Edwards M, Millodot M, Goh WSH. A 2-year longitudinal study of myopia progression and optical component changes among Hong Kong schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76: 370–380.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Saw SM, Tong L, Chua WH, et al. Incidence and progression of myopia in Singaporean school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:51–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Moeschberger ML, Jones LA, Zadnik K. Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children’s refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:3633–3640.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wong L, Coggan D, Cruddas M, Hwang CH. Education, reading, and familial tendency as risk factors for myopia in Hong Kong fishermen. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993;47:50–53.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Saw SM, Cheng A, Fong A, et al. School grade and myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007;27:126–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tan NWH, Saw SM, Lam DC, Cheng HM, Rajan U, Chew SJ. Temporal variation in myopia progression in Singaporean children within an academic year. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:465–472.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Saw SM, Hong CY, Chia KS, Stone RA, Tan D. Nearwork and myopia in young children. Lancet 2001;357:390.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Norton TT, et al. Accommodation and related risk factor associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:2143–2151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ip JM, Saw SM, Rose KA, Morgan IG, Kifley A, Wang JJ, et al. Role of near work in myopia: finding in a sample of Australian school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49: 2903–2910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Williams C, Miller LL, Gazzard G, Saw SM. A comparison of measures of reading and intelligence as risk factors for the development of myopia in UK cohort of children. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1117–1121.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke L. -K. Lin.

About this article

Cite this article

Shih, YF., Chiang, TH., Hsiao, C.K. et al. Comparing myopic progression of urban and rural Taiwanese schoolchildren. Jpn J Ophthalmol 54, 446–451 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-010-0860-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • myopic progression
  • rural
  • urban