Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of travoprost in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) over a 12-month follow-up.
Methods
Forty-five eyes of 45 patients with unilateral NTG were treated with travoprost (0.004%) once a day for 12 months. Mean IOP and the IOP reduction from baseline were assessed at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the initiation of the treatment. Adverse ocular event frequency and the frequency of discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events were evaluated.
Results
Mean IOP during 12 months of travoprost treatment ranged from 11.17 to 11.82 mmHg, and the mean IOP reduction in relation to baseline IOP from −2.71 to −3.71 mmHg (−18.3% to −25.1%). Mean IOP and IOP changes in the travoprost-treated and control groups were significantly different at every follow-up (P < 0.05 in each case). Both the magnitude (r = 0.6992) and percentage (r = 0.5464) of IOP reductions correlated positively with baseline IOP values. Ocular adverse events were usually mild to moderate and resolved without treatment.
Conclusions
Travoprost was well tolerated and significantly reduced IOP in NTG patients. In addition, initial IOP reductions were maintained throughout follow-up. Travoprost was found to be more effective in patients with greater baseline IOP.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hellberg MR, Sallee VL, McLaughlin MA, et al. Preclinical efficacy of travoprost, a potent and selective FP prostaglandin receptor agonist. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2001;17:421–432.
Netland PA, Landry T, Sullivan EK, et al. Travoprost compared with latanoprost and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:472–484.
Goldberg I, Cunha-Vaz J, Jakobsen JE, et al. Comparison of topical travoprost eye drops given once daily and timolol 0.5% given twice daily in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma 2001;10:414–422.
Fellman RL, Sullivan EK, Ratliff M, et al. Comparison of travoprost 0.0015% and 0.004% with timolol 0.5% in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 6-month, masked, multicenter trial. Ophthalmology 2002;109:998–1008.
Barnebey HS, Orengo-Nania S, Flowers BE, et al. The safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:1–7.
Hoyng PF, Kitazawa Y. Medical treatment of normal tension glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47Suppl 1:116S–124S.
Netland PA, Robertson SM, Sullivan EK, et al. Response to travoprost in black and nonblack patients with open-angle glaucoma ocular hypertension. Adv Ther 2003;20:149–163.
Tomita G, Araie M, Kitazawa Y, Tsukahara S. A three-year prospective,, randomized and open comparison between latanoprost and timolol in Japanese normal-tension glaucoma patients. Eye 2004;18:984–989.
Ang A, Reddy MA, Shepstone L, Broadway DC. Long term effect of latanoprost on intraocular pressure in normal tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:630–634.
Oh JY, Park KH. The effect of latanoprost on intraocular pressure during 12 months of treatment for normal-tension glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol 2005;19:297–301.
Tamada Y, Taniguchi T, Murase H, et al. Intraocular pressurelowering efficacy of latanoprost in patients with normal-tension glaucoma or primary open-angle glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2001;17:19–25.
Rulo AH, Greve EL, Geijssen HC, Hoyng PF. Reduction of intraocular pressure with treatment of latanoprost once daily in patients with normal pressure glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1276–1282.
Konstas AG, Kozobolis VP, Katsimpris IE, et al. Efficacy and safety of latanoprost versus travoprost in exfoliative glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology 2007;114:653–657.
Parrish RK, Palmberg P, Sheu WP, et al. A comparison of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 12-week, randomized, masked-evaluator multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:688–703.
Orengo-Nania S, Landry T, Von Tress M, et al. Evaluation of travoprost as adjunctive therapy in patients with uncontrolled intraocular pressure while using timolol 0.5%. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:860–868.
Camras CB and the United States Latanoprost Study Group. Comparison of latanoprost and timolol in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: a six-month, masked, multicenter trial in the United States. Ophthalmology 1996;103:138–147.
Kook MS, Lee K. Increased eyelid pigmentation associated with use of latanoprost. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:804–806.
Tosti A, Pazzaglia M, Voudouris S, Tosti G. Hypertrichosis of the eyelashes caused by bimatoprost. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51:1040.
Woodward DF, Krauss P, Chen J, et al. The pharmacology of bimatoprost (Lumigan). Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45Suppl 4:337S–345S.
Yang HK, Park KH, Kim TW, Kim DM. Eyelid superior sulcus deepening after topical travoprost treatment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2009; in press.
Peplinski LS, Albiani SK. Deepening of lid sulcus from topical bimatoprost therapy Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:574–577.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Suh, M.H., Park, K.H. & Kim, D.M. Effect of travoprost on intraocular pressure during 12 months of treatment for normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 53, 18–23 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-008-0617-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-008-0617-8