Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Microperimeter That Provides Fixation Pattern and Retinal Sensitivity Measurement

  • LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate a microperimeter (MP-1) that can independently measure fixation status and microperimetry of retinal threshold sensitivity by comparing the results obtained by the MP-1 with those obtained by scotometry using scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO).

Methods

Fourteen patients (15 eyes) with a macular disorder were examined by the MP-1 fixation test, MP-1 microperimetry, and SLO scotometry. The scotoma size seen in MP-1 microperimetry was compared with that observed in SLO scotometry. The location of the preferred retinal locus (PRL) and the fixation stability, which were obtained from the fixation test in MP-1, were also compared with those obtained in SLO scotometry.

Results

The scotoma size, which was not seen with 0 dB in MP-1 microperimetry, was larger than that in SLO scotometry in 8 of the 15 eyes. Retinal threshold sensitivity decreases were found using MP-1 microperimetry within a sensitive area of SLO scotometry in all eyes. The PRL in the MP-1 fixation test and in SLO scotometry agreed in all eyes. Fixation stability in the MP-1 fixation test significantly correlated with that in SLO scotometry (P = 0.0192).

Conclusions

The results of MP-1 microperimetry do not completely agree with those of SLO scotometry owing to the difference in stimulus intensity. The MP-1 fixation test is useful for measuring PRL and fixation stability in a short time. MP-1 might be helpful to evaluate the foveal function in patients with macular disorders without severely damaged macular function. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2006;50:111–115 © Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2006

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RN Sjaarda DA Frank BM Glaser JT Thompson RP Murphy (1993) ArticleTitleAssessment of vision in idiopathic macular holes with macular microperimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope Ophthalmology 100 1513–1518 Occurrence Handle8414412 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD38%2FntFI%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. TH Tezel LV Del Priore BE Flowers et al. (1996) ArticleTitleCorrelation between scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry and anatomic abnormalities in patients with subfoveal neovascularization Opthalmology 103 1829–1836 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD1MfjtlM%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. NR Sabates WG Crane FN Sabates RA Schuchard DC Fletcher (1996) ArticleTitleScanning laser ophthalmoscope macular perimetry in the evaluation of submacular surgery Retina 16 296–304 Occurrence Handle8865389 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD3Mfnslc%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M Tsujikawa M Sawa JM Lewis et al. (1998) ArticleTitleChorioretinal damage caused by the excision of choroidal neovascularization Am J Ophthalmol 126 348–357 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00089-0 Occurrence Handle9744367 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvhsFKitA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. GY Fujii E de Juan SuffixJr J Sunness et al. (2002) ArticleTitlePatient selection for macular translocation surgery using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope Ophthalmology 109 1737–1744 Occurrence Handle12208725

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. JS Sunness RA Schuchard N Shen et al. (1995) ArticleTitleLandmark-driven fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36 1863–1874 Occurrence Handle7635660 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA283ks1E%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. E Midena PP Radin E Pilotto et al. (2004) ArticleTitleFixation pattern and macular sensitivity in eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. A microperimetry study Semin Ophthalmol 19 55–61 Occurrence Handle15590535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. C Springer S Bultmann HE Volcker K Rohrschneider (2005) ArticleTitleFundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry Ophthalmology 112 848–854 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.11.051 Occurrence Handle15878065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. F Toonen A Remky V Janssen S Wolf M Reim (1995) ArticleTitleMicroperimetry in patients with central serous retinopathy Ger J Ophthalmol 4 311–314 Occurrence Handle7496344 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD2sjms1Q%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. F Mori S Ishiko N Kitaya et al. (2002) ArticleTitleUse of scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry in clinically significant macular edema in type 2 diabetes mellitus Jpn J Ophthalmol 46 650–655 Occurrence Handle12543192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. K Rohrschneider S Bultmann R Gluck et al. (2000) ArticleTitleScanning laser ophthalmoscope fundus perimetry before and after laser photocoagulation for clinically significant diabetic macular edema Am J Ophthalmol 129 27–32 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00270-6 Occurrence Handle10653409 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7hslWgtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y Oshima S Harino Y Tano (1998) ArticleTitleScanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetric assessment in patients with successful laser treatment for juxtafoveal choroidal neovascularization Retina 18 109–117 Occurrence Handle9564690 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3isFykug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. T Hikichi S Ishiko A Takamiya et al. (2000) ArticleTitleScanning laser ophthalmoscope correlations with biomicroscopic findings and foveal function after macular hole closure Arch Ophthalmol 118 193–197 Occurrence Handle10676784 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jvF2mtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. F Mori S Ishiko N Kitaya et al. (2001) ArticleTitleScotoma and fixation patterns using scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry in patients with macular dystrophy Am J Ophthalmol 132 897–902 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01216-8 Occurrence Handle11730655 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnosVCiug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. JS Sunness CA Applegate D Haselwood GS Rubin (1996) ArticleTitleFixation patterns and reading rates in eyes with central scotomas from advanced atrophic age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt disease Ophthalmology 103 1458–1466 Occurrence Handle8841306 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymH3sfpslU%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S Ishiko H Ogasawara A Yoshida K Hanada (1998) ArticleTitleThe use of scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry to detect visual impairment caused by macular photocoagulation Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 29 95–98 Occurrence Handle9507251 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7mvVSqsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumi Gomi.

About this article

Cite this article

Sawa, M., Gomi, F., Toyoda, A. et al. A Microperimeter That Provides Fixation Pattern and Retinal Sensitivity Measurement. Jpn J Ophthalmol 50, 111–115 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-005-0292-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-005-0292-y

Key words

Navigation