Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Human capital and productivity growth in a services economy: Some insights from the Portuguese case

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Economics and Economic Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Has the Portuguese economy benefited from tertiarization in terms of aggregate productivity performance? Did human capital availability play a role in this expansion of the services sector? To answer these two research questions, we investigate the existence of causality among services sector expansion, human capital, and aggregate productivity for the period 1970–2006 in the Portuguese economy based on the estimation of VAR models and impulse response analysis. We distinguish between the contributions of five different services sub-sectors that can be broadly classified as either traditional personal services or modern progressive services. The evidence suggests bi-directional causality between services sub-sectors employment shares and aggregate productivity. Across services sub-sectors, community social and personal services, that include health care and education activities, seem to be the most influential sector, followed by finance, insurance, real estate and business services, making both a positive and lasting contribution to aggregate productivity. Although only indicative, this evidence points to the relatively low weight of modern progressive services sectors in Portugal, together with a relatively less important role for some traditional personal services sub-sectors that can be sources of human capital, as candidate explanations for the slowdown in aggregate productivity growth over the period under analysis. The causality analysis did not allow us to confirm the role of human capital in driving the expansion of services subsectors, although the impulse response analysis points to a positive impact on aggregate productivity and the expansion of finance, insurance, real estate and business services and community social and personal services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Deindustrialization has occurred in both high and low income countries, as documented by Ghani and O'Connell (2014) for a sample of 100 countries over the period 1990–2012. According to the authors, manufacturing industry has been losing its relative importance in terms of its contribution to GDP in all the countries in the sample. The only exception is China, where the relative importance of manufacturing increased.

  2. In a recent study, Franck and Galor (2017) even suggest that intensive industrialization can have an adverse effect on income per capita levels when it is associated with underinvestment in human capital and lower employment in skilled-intensive activities. According to the authors, it was not the adoption of more productive technology in manufacturing that was the main source of prosperity in todays advanced countries but its association with higher human capital levels. They provide evidence on the effect of industrialization on the process of development supporting this argument based on the diffusion and adoption of steam engines across France.

  3. Several authors also highlight the possibility that tertiarization is a consequence not a cause of economic growth due to higher demand as income grows or more investment in R&D and education as a country develops, see e.g. (Foellmi and Zweimüller 2008); (Bonatti and Felice 2008); (Peneder 2003), so reverse causation can also occur.

  4. For some earlier empirical analyses see (Dutt and Lee 1993) and (Ansari 1992). Both the cross-country study of Dutt and Lee (1993) and the time series studies of Ansari (1992) point to a negative growth impact of increased specialisation towards the services sector. None of these studies differentiates across services sub-sectors and do not consider more recent periods when information and communication technologies became more important for productivity growth, especially in the services sector.

  5. Average number of years of primary, tertiary and total education of the working age population were also considered as proxies for human capital in the VAR models. The average number of years of secondary education of the working age population was the proxy selected because it produces better results in terms of rejection of nullity of its coefficients in the VAR models and also in terms of the information criteria (BIC).

  6. Sectoral employment data comes from the EU KLEMS database (O’Mahony and Timmer (2009)), TFP data from the European Commission AMECO database and human capital data from Teixeira (2005) and Barro and Lee (2013).

  7. We also applied the KPSS stationarity test (Kwiatkowski et al. (1992)). The results from the KPSS test give a somewhat different picture. For the variables syr and sh_h_emp_c the null of stationary around a trend is not rejected at the 10% level of significance. These results are available from the authors upon request.

  8. The results of all the tests described in this paragraph are available from the authors.

References

  • Ansari ML (1992) Growth effects of recent structural changes in the Canadian economy: some empirical evidence. Appl Econ 24:1233–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R, Lee J-W (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. J Dev Econ 104(C):184–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1967) Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. Am Econ Rev 57(3):415–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1985) Productivity policy and the service sector. In: Inman RP (ed) Managing the service economy: prospects and problems. Cambridge Un. Press, Cambridge, pp 301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonatti L, Felice G (2008) Endogenous growth and changing sectoral composition in advanced economies. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 19:109–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmarchelier, B., F. Djellal and F. Gallouj. 2013. Knowledge intensive business services and long term growth. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 25(C): 188–205

  • Dickey D, Fuller W (1979) Distribution of the estimators for time series regressions with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366):427–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich A (2012) Does growth cause structural change, or is it the other way around? A dynamic panel data analysis for seven oecd countries. Empir Econ 43(3):915–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan, T. 2011. RATS Handbook for Vector Autoregressions, Estima, Evanston

  • Doan, T. 2013a. MCVARDODRAWS, Procedure for RATS 8.3, Estima, Evanston

  • Doan, T. 2013b. MCGRAPHIRF, Procedure for RATS 8.3, Estima, Evanston

  • Doan T, Litterman R, Sims C (1984) Forecasting and conditional projection using realistic prior distributions. Econ Rev 3:1–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte A, Simões M (2014) Tertiarization and human capital: do they matter for growth? Insights from Portugal. Sci Ann Ec Sci 61(1):31–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt AK, Lee KY (1993) The service sector and economic growth: some cross-section evidence. Int Rev Appl Econ 7(3):311–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. and Gupta, P. (2011). The Service Sector as India's Road to Economic Growth, NBER Working Papers No 16757

  • Enache, M.; Ghani, E. and O'Connell, S. 2016. Structural transformation in Africa: a historical view. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7743

  • Foellmi R, Zweimüller J (2008) Structural change, engel’s consumption cycles and kaldor’s facts of economic growth. J Monet Econ 55(7):1317–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franck, Raphael and Galor, Oded. (2017). Flowers of evil? Industrial development and long-run prosperity. NBER Working Papers no 23701

  • Ghani E e (2010) The service revolution in south asia. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, E and S O'Connell. (2014). Can service be a growth escalator in low-income countries? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No 6971

  • Hartwig J (2012) Testing the growth effects of structural change. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 23(1):11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1995) Likelihood-based inference in Cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson D, Timmer M (2011) Structural change in advanced nations: a new set of stylized facts. Scand J Econ 113(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur BK (2012) Progressive services, asymptotically stagnant services, and manufacturing: growth and structural change. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 36:1322–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J Econ 54:159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljung GM, Box GEP (1978) On a measure of a lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 65(2):297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl H (2004) Vector autoregressive and vector error correction models. In: Lütkepohl H, Krätzig M (eds) Applied time series econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 86–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maroto-Sánchez A, Cuadrado-Roura J (2009) Is growth of services an obstacle to productivity growth? A comparative analysis. Structural Change & Econ Dynamics 20:254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony M, Timmer MP (2009) Output, input and productivity measures at the industry level: the eu klems database. Economic Journal 119(538):F374–F403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oecd (2005) Enhancing the performance of the services sector. OECD, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peneder M (2003) Industrial structure and aggregate growth. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 14(4):427–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peneder M (2007) A sectoral taxonomy of educational intensity. Empirica 34:189–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran M, Shin Y (1998) Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Econ Lett 58(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugno M (2006) The service paradox and endogenous economic growth. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 17:99–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva EGD (2011) Portugal and Spain: catching up and falling behind. A comparative analysis of productivity trends and their causes, 1980–2007. FEP Working Papers No. 459

  • Silva EG, Teixeira AaC (2011) Does structure influence growth? A panel data econometric assessment of ‘relatively less developed’ countries, 1979-2003. Ind Corp Chang 20(2):433–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva EGD, Teixeira AaC (2012) In the shadow of the financial crisis: dismal structural change and productivity trends in south-western europe over the last four decades. WWWforEurope: Workshop on European Governance and the Problems of Peripheral Countries, July 12th and 13th, 2012

  • Simões M, Duarte A (2014). Human capital and growth in services economies: the case of Portugal. In A. Teixeira, E. Silva, & R. Mamede (Eds.), Structural change, competitiveness and industrial policy, painful lessons from the European periphery (pp. 151-181): Routledge

  • Sims C, Zha T (1999) Error bands for impulse responses. Econometrica 67(5):1113–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira AaC (2005) Measuring aggregate human capital in Portugal: 1960-2001. Port J Soc Sci 4(2):101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira A, Queirós A (2016) Economic growth, human capital and structural change: a dynamic panel data analysis. Res Policy 45(8):1636–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmer M, de Vries G, de Vries K (2015). Patterns of structural change in developing countries. In J. Weiss, & M. Tribe (Eds.), Routledge handbook of industry and development (pp. 65–83). (Routledge Handbooks). Routledge

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank participants at the 15th INFER Annual Conference, EcoMod2013, and three anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta C. N. Simões.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 1
figure 1

Impulse response shocks, Model 1: wholesale and retail trade – T

Fig. 2
figure 2

Impulse response shocks, Model 2: hotels and restaurants – R

Fig. 3
figure 3

Impulse response shocks, Model 3: transport and storage and communications – C

Fig. 4
figure 4

Impulse response shocks, Model 4: finance, insurance, real estate and business services – F

Fig. 5
figure 5

Impulse response shocks, Model 5: community social and personal services - P

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simões, M.C.N., Duarte, A. & Andrade, J.S. Human capital and productivity growth in a services economy: Some insights from the Portuguese case. Int Econ Econ Policy 16, 511–534 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-019-00439-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-019-00439-0

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation