Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of regional trade agreements on European exports

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Economics and Economic Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of European regional trade agreements on European export patterns. Using a simple fixed effects estimation method, it appears that only the extensive margin is positively affected by trade agreements, while the impact on total exports and on the intensive margin is insignificant. This finding breaks down, however, if one distinguishes between individual European countries. There appears to be substantial heterogeneity across European Union member states. Moreover, the impact on the extensive margin can be explained by the inclusion of various trade-related aspects in trade agreements, which deepen the effective trade integration between the European Union and its trading partners. Finally, using a composite indicator capturing the intensity of trade integration across twelve recent European trade agreements, we cannot conclude that more comprehensive trade agreements enhance exports more.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. RTA is the general name referring to five kinds of trade agreements: Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs), Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), Customs Unions (CUs), Common Markets and Economic Unions.

  2. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/regfac_e.htm

  3. European Commission (2004). European Neighbourhood Policy: Strategy Paper. Brussels, Communication from the Commission, COM(2004) 373 final.

  4. Table 3 in the Appendix gives an overview of all trade topics considered in this study.

  5. The RTAs in gray in Table 2 in the Appendix are left out for the construction of the composite indicator.

  6. The agreements the EU recently concluded with the Republic of Korea in 2011, the Eastern and Southern African states in 2012 and Central America, Peru and Colombia in 2013 were left out the analysis because the time period for these RTAs was too short to precisely analyze their trade-enhancing effects.

  7. Note that the sum of the coefficients of the final two columns is always equal to the coefficients of the first column.

References

  • Adams, R., Dee, P., Gali, J., McGuire, G. (2003). The trade and investment effects of regional trading arrangements—Old and new evidence. Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government, Productivity Commission, May

  • Ahearn, R. J. (2011). Europe’s regional trade agreements: status, content, and implications. CRS Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service

  • Aitken ND (1973) The effect of the EEC and EFTA on European trade: a temporal cross-section analysis. Am Econ Rev 63(5):881–892

  • Baier SL, Bergstrand JH (2009) Estimating the effects of free trade agreements on international trade flows using matching econometrics. J Int Econ 77:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin ER, Seghezza E (2010) Are trade blocs building or stumbling blocs? J Econ Integr 25:276–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi T, Eichengreen B (1997) Is regionalism simply a diversion? Evidence from the evolution of the EC and EFTA. In: Ito T, Krueger AO (eds) Regionalism versus multilateral trade arrangements. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedictis L, Taglioni D (2011) In: De Benedictis L, Salvatici L (eds) The trade impact of European Union regional policies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 55–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16564-1_4

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, Harry P. Moesen, W., 2005. "Benchmarking the competitiveness of nations: non-uniform weighting and non-economic dimensions," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2005–2, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School

  • Braga, P.C.A., Yeats, A., & Safadi, R. (1994). NAFTA's implications for east Asian exports. Policy research working paper 1351. The World Bank, International Economics Department, International Trade Division

  • CEPII (2018a) BACI trade database. http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=1

  • CEPII (2018b) Gravity indicators database. http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=8

  • Cherchye L (2001) “Using data envelopment analysis to assess macroeconomic policy performance”. Appl Econ 33:407−416

  • Cherchye L, Kuosmanen T (2006) Benchmarking sustainable development: a synthetic meta-index approach. In: McGillivray M, Clarke M (eds) Understanding human well-being, chapter 7. United Nations University Press

  • Cherchye, L. Moesen, W. (1998). The macroeconomic performance of nations measurement and perception, Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces9822, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën

  • Cherchye L, Moesen W, Puyenbroeck T (2004) Legitimately diverse, yet comparable: on synthesizing social inclusion performance in the EU. J Common Mark Stud 42(5):919–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherchye L, Lovell K, Moesen W, Van Puyenbroeck T (2007) One market, one number? A composite indicator assessment of EU internal market dynamics. Eur Econ Rev 51:749–779

  • Dee P, Gali J (2003) The trade and investment effects of preferential trading arrangements. NBER working paper no. 10160

  • European Commission (2004), The EU Economy Review 2004, European Economy, Nr.6 (Office for Official Publications of the EC, Luxembourg)

  • Frankel JA, Wei S-J (1998) Regionalization of world trade and currencies: economics and politics. In: Frankel J (ed) The regionalization in the world economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (2018) World economic outlook database. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/02/weodata/index.aspx

  • Linneman H (1966) An econometric study of international trade flows. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee CSP (2008) New measures of trade creation and trade diversion. J Int Econ 75:349–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahlberg, B., Obsteiner, M. (2001), Remeasuring the HDI by data envelopment analysis. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Interim Report 01–069

  • Mátyás L (1997) Proper econometric specification of the gravity model. World Econ 20(3):363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melyn, W., Moesen, W. (1991), Towards a synthetic Indicator of macroeconomic performance: unequal weighting when limited information is available. Public Economics Research Paper 17, CES, KU Leuven

  • Mordonu, A. (2006). Measuring trade diversion-the case of Russian exports in the advent of EU enlargement. Working papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/394, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration

  • Rose AK (2000) One money, one market? The effects of common currencies on international trade. Econ Policy 15:7–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy J (2010) Do customs union members engage in more bilateral trade than free-trade agreement members? Rev Int Econ 18(4):663–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soete S, Van Hove J (2017) Dissecting the trade effects of Europe’s economic integration agreements. J Econ Integr 32(1):193–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WTO Secretariat (2018) http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/regfac_e.htm

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge comments on previous versions of this paper by two anonymous referees. We also thank Guido De Bruyne, Camelia Turcu, Sophie Soete and Huw Edwards for fruitful comments. Zuzanna Studnicka and Jan Van Hove benefited from financial support by FWO Flanders (Research Grant G.0365.10N).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Van Hove.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2 Overview of EU RTAs for goods (G) and services (S)
Table 3 Trade issues taken into account in the analysis
Table 4 Benefit of the doubt composite indicator for selected RTAs
Table 5 Impact of RTAs on total exports and the margins of trade
Table 6 Impact of trade topics on total exports and the margins of trade
Table 7 Impact of the intensity of trade liberalization on total exports and the margins of trade
Table 8 Impact of the intensity of trade liberalization on total exports and the margins of trade

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Studnicka, Z., Thierie, W. & Van Hove, J. The impact of regional trade agreements on European exports. Int Econ Econ Policy 16, 467–488 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-019-00436-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-019-00436-3

Navigation