Advertisement

International Economics and Economic Policy

, Volume 11, Issue 1–2, pp 197–230 | Cite as

Dynamics in ICT cooperation networks in selected German ICT clusters

  • Christian Schröder
Original Paper

Abstract

High innovation capability is indispensable for generating economic growth in developed economies. Cooperations in the innovation process are entered into by companies for reasons of risk diversification or costs and often considered to be an efficient strategy to increase a company’s knowledge basis. Regional economic literature very often believes that regional agglomeration of companies, i.e. cluster formation, will also lead to increased local networking, i.e. also to cooperations between companies or between company and research institutes in the innovation process. A social network analysis of the two German ICT regions performed with patent data was able to show that cluster formation coincides with a dynamic increase of cooperations measured by joint patent applications. However, the cooperations are characterized by integration of extra-regional companies and research institutes rather than being intraregional.

Keywords

Regional science Cluster ICT Knowledge spillover Social network analysis Innovation networks 

JEL classification

R10 O18 L63 L86 

References

  1. Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60:323–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion P, Howitt P (1997) A Schumpeterian perspective on growth and competition. In: Kreps D, Wallis KF (eds) Advances in economics and economietrics: theory and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 279–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localisation of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Manag Sci 45:905–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angel D (2002) Inter-firm collaboration and technology development partnerships with US manufacturing industries. Region Stud 34:333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angel D, Engstrom J (1995) Manufacturing systems and technological change: the US personal computer industry. Econ Geogr 71:79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arndt O, Sternberg R (2000) Do manufacturing firms profit from intraregional innovation linkages? An empirical answer. Eur Plann Stud 8:465–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch D (1998) Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 14:18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baptista R, Swann P (1998) Do firms in clusters innovate more? Res Policy 27:525–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beaudry C, Breschi S (2003) Are firms in clusters really more innovative. Econ Innov New Technol 12:325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breschi S, Lissoni F (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Ind Corp Change 10:975–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown R (2000) Clusters, supply chains and local embeddedness in Fyrstad. Eur Urban Region Stud 7:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) (2010a) http://www.kompetenznetze.de/?set_language=en. Accessed 01 January 2012
  13. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) (2010b) http://www.kompetenznetze.de/initiative/die-geschaftsstelle. Accessed 31 August 2010
  14. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) (2010c) Aufnahmenkriterien Initiative Kompetenznetze Deutschland. http://www.kompetenznetze.de/initiative/die-aufnahme/aufnahmekriterien_initiativekompetenznetzedeutschland.pdf. Accessed 31 August 2010
  15. Cantner U, Graf H, Meder A (2009) Urbane innovationssysteme: das innovationsnetzwerk in Jena. doi: 10.1007/978-3-531-91349-0_10
  16. Cohen W, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. administrative science quarterly 35 special issue: technology, organizations, and innovation: 128–152Google Scholar
  17. Cooke P, De Laurentis C, Tödtling F, Trippl M (eds) (2007) Regional knowledge economics: markets, clusters and innovation. Oxford University Press, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  18. Delgado M, Porter M, Stern S (2010) Cluster, convergence, and economic performance. US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper CES-WP-10-34Google Scholar
  19. Döring T, Schnellenbach J (2006) What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth? theory and evidence. Region Stud 40:375–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Emons O (2011) Innovations- and Spezialisierungsdynamik im Automotivesektor: Vergleichsanalyse von europäischen Kooperations- and innovatorennetzwerken. In: Welfens PJJ (ed) Cluster- und innovations dynamik in Europa: neue perspektiven der automobil- und IKT Wirtschaft. Lucius, Stuttgart, pp 323–479Google Scholar
  21. Engelsoft S, Jensen-Butler C, Smith I, Winther L (2006) Industrial clusters in Denmark: theory and empirical evidence. Papers Region Sci 85:73–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Falck O, Heblich S, Kipar S (2010) Industrial innovation: direct evidence from cluster-oriented policy. Region Sci Urban Econ 40:574–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feser E, Renski H, Goldstein H (2008) Clusters and economic development outcomes: an analysis of the link between clustering and industry growth. Econ Dev Quart 22:324–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fontagné L, Koenig P, Mayernis, F., Poncet, S. (2010) Clustering the winners: the French policy of competitiveness clusters, CEPII Working Paper 2010-18Google Scholar
  25. Freeman L (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1:215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gertler M, Wolfe D, Garkut D (2000) No place like home? The embeddedness of innovation in a regional economy. Rev Int Political Econ 7:688–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giuliani E (2005) The structure of cluster knowledge networks: uneven and selective, not pervasive and collective. Eur Urban Reg Stud 12:269–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Graf H, Henning T (2009) Public research in regional networks of innovators: a comparative study of four East German regions. Reg Stud 43:1349–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J Econ 10:92–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Griliches Z (1992) The search for R&D spillovers. Scand J Econ 94(Supplement):29–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hafner K (2008) Agglomeration economics and clustering - evidence from German firms, cege Discussion Papers 72Google Scholar
  32. He J, Fallah M (2009) Is inventor network structure a predictor of cluster evolution? Technol Forecast Soc Change 76:91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hendry C, Brown J, Defillippi R (2000) Regional clustering of high technology-based firms: opto-electronics in three countries. Reg Stud 34:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Howitt P, Aghion P (1998) Capital accumulation and innovation as complementary factors in long-run growth. J Econ Growth 3:111–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart J Econ 108:577–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalasky R, MacPherson A (2003) Input/output ranges and performance: an examination of US machine tool producers. Entrep Reg Dev 15:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kearns A, Gorg H (2002) Linkages, agglomerations and knowledge spillovers in the Irish electronics industry: the regional dimension. Int J Technol Manag 24:743–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim J, Marschke G (2005) Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm’s patenting decision. RAND J Econ 36:424–428Google Scholar
  39. Lawson C, Lorenz E (1999) Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Reg Stud 33:305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lawton-Smith H (2003) Local innovation assemblages and institutional capacity in local high-tech economic development: the case of Oxfordshire. Urban Stud 40:1353–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22:3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyons D (2000) Embeddedness, milieu, and innovation among high-technology firms: a Richardson, Texas, case study. Environ Plann A 32:891–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mahmutovic Z (2011) Patentdatenbank – Implementierung and Nutzung. In: Welfens PJJ (ed) Cluster- and Innovationsdynamik in Europa: Neue Perspektiven der Automobil- und IKT Wirtschaft. Lucius, Stuttgart, pp 309–321Google Scholar
  44. Maine E, Shapiro D, Vining A (2010) The role of clustering in the growth of new technology-based firms. Small Bus Econ 34:127–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Malmberg A, Power D (2005) (How) do (firms in) clusters create knowledge? Ind Innov 12:409–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. McDonald F, Tsagdis D, Huang Q (2006) The development of industrial clusters and public policy. Entrep Reg Dev 18:525–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mota J, de Castro L (2004) Industrial agglomeration as localized networks: the case of the Portuguese injection mould industry. Environ Plann A 36:263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nelson R (1990) What is public and what is private about technology? CCC Working Paper 90-9. University of California, Center for Research in ManagementGoogle Scholar
  50. Peretto P (1998) Technological change, market rivalry, and the evolution of the capitalist engine of growth. J Econ Growth 3:53–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peretto P (1999a) Firm size, rivalry and the extent of the market in endogenous technological change. Eur Econ Rev 43:1747–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peretto P (1999b) Industrial development, technological change, and long-run growth. J Dev Econ 59:389–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Rodríguez-Pose A, Refolo M (2003) The link between local production systems and public and university research in Italy. Environ Plann A 35:1477–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Romer P (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Political Econ 94:1002–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sakakibara M (2003) Knowledge sharing in cooperative research and development. Manag Decis Econ 24:117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmitz J (1989) Imitation, entrepreneurship, and long-run growth. J Political Econ 97:721–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmitz H (1999) Collective efficiency and increasing returns. Camb J Econ 23:465–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schumpeter A (1911) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  60. Simmie J (2002) Knowledge spillovers and reasons for the concentration of innovative SMEs. Urban Stud 39:885–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tomokazu A, Fujita M, Kameyama Y (2006) Effects of regional cooperation among small and medium-sized firms on their growth in Japanese industrial clusters. Rev Urban Reg Dev Stud (RURDS) 18:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Waters R, Lawton-Smith H (2006) Social networks in high-technology local economies: the case of Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire. Eur Urban Reg Stud 15:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Welfens PJJ (2011) IKT expansion, strukturwandel and clusterdynamik in der EU, in: cluster- and innovationsdynamik in europa. In: Welfens PJJ (ed) Neue perspektiven der automobil- and IKT wirtschaft. Lucius, Stuttgart, pp 1–136Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Mittelstandsforschung BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations