International Economics and Economic Policy

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 521–547 | Cite as

Economic performance and international trade engagement: the case of Portuguese manufacturing firms

Original Paper

Abstract

By combining economic and financial data for Portuguese manufacturing firms with data on their exports and imports, we uncover some aspects of the relationship between international trade engagement and firms’ performances. In line with recent theoretical and empirical developments in the international trade literature: (i) we testify that Portuguese international trade is highly concentrated, especially on the import side, and both in inter- and intra-sector terms; (ii) we corroborate previous studies and theses according to which two-way traders outperform only importers, only exporters and above all domestic firms; (iii) we find that the greater the diversification of markets and goods (especially with regard to imports), the better the performance achieved by internationalised firms; (iv) we notice that the higher the intensity of firms’ international trade (especially imports), the better their performance; (v) we also present evidence that destination markets for exports and origin markets for imports are also important in explaining firm’s performance.

Keywords

International trade Firm performance Diversification 
JEL classification C23 F14 F23 

References

  1. Altomonte C, Békés G (2009) Trade complexity and productivity. KTI/IE Institute of economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Discussion papers, 2009/14, July.Google Scholar
  2. Amador J, Opromolla L (2010) The margins of exports: firms. Products and destinations. Economic Bulletin, Banco de Portugal, Spring 2010.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson M, Johansson S, Lööf H (2008) Productivity and international trade: firm level evidence from a small open economy. Rev World Econ 144(4):744–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aw B, Hwang AR (1995) Productivity and the export markets: a firm-level analysis. J Dev Econ 47(2):313–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum CF (2006) An Introduction to Modern Econometrics using Stata. Stata Press, TexasGoogle Scholar
  6. Békés G, Harasztosi P, Muraközy B (2009) Firms and products in international trade: data and patterns for Hungary. Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Discussion Papers MT-DP - 2009/19.Google Scholar
  7. Bernard A, Jensen B (1995) Exporters, jobs and wages in U.S. manufacturing 1976–1987. Brookings PapEcon Act 1995:67–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernard A, Eaton J, Jensen B, Kortum S (2003) Plants and productivity in international trade. Am Econ Rev 93(4):1268–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernard A, Jensen B, Redding S, Schott P (2007) Firms in international trade. Journal of International Perspectives 21(3):105–130Google Scholar
  10. Bernard A, Jensen B, Schott P (2009) Importers, exporters and multinationals: a portrait of firms in the U.S. that trade goods. Published in NBER book Producer dynamics: new evidence from micro data. Chapter 14. Timothy Dunne, J. Bradford Jensen, and Mark J. Roberts, editors. January 2009.Google Scholar
  11. Blundell R, Bond S (2000) GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econ Rev 19(3):321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castellani D, Serti F, Tomasi C (2010) Firms in international trade: importers’ and exporters’ heterogeneity in the Italian manufacturing industry. World Economy 33(3):424–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaney T (2008) Distorted gravity: the intensive and extensive margins of international trade. Am Econ Rev 98(4):1707–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowell F, Jenkins S (1995) How much inequality can we explain? A methodology and an application to the USA. Econ J 105(429):421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Damijan J, Polanec S, Prasnikar J (2004) Self-selection, export market heterogeneity and productivity improvements: firm-level evidence from Slovenia. LICOS – Centre for Transition Economics Working Paper 14804.Google Scholar
  16. Eaton J, Kortum S, Kramar F (2004) Dissecting trade: firms, industries and exports destinations. Am Econ Rev 94(2):150–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, May 6.Google Scholar
  18. Haller S (2009) Exporting, importing, intra-firm trade and firm productivity. Mimeo, August.Google Scholar
  19. Handley K, Limão N (2011) Trade and investment under policy uncertainty: theory and firm evidence. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  20. Helpman E, Melitz M, Rubinstein Y (2008) Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading values. Q J Econ 123(2):441–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kasahara H, Lapham B (2008) Productivity and the decision to import and export: theory and evidence. CESIfo Working Paper No.2240.Google Scholar
  22. Lawless M (2009) Firm export dynamics and the geography of trade. J Int Econ 77(2):245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production function using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70:317–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maggioni D (2009) Learning by exporting: which channels? An empirical analysis for Turkey. F.R.E.I.T. Working Papers No.32, March.Google Scholar
  25. Mayer T, Ottaviano G (2007) The happy few: the internationalisation of European firms. New facts based on firm-level evidence. Bruegel Blueprint Series, Volume III.Google Scholar
  26. McCann F (2009) Importing, exporting and productivity in Irish manufacturing. University College Dublin, School of Economics Working Papers 200922.Google Scholar
  27. Melitz M (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muûls M, Pisu M (2009) Imports and exports at the level of the firm: evidence from Belgium. World Economy 32(5):692–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res Policy 13:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Serti F, Tomasi C (2008) Firm heterogeneity: do destinations of exports and origin of imports matter? Rev World Econ 144(4):660–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Silva A, Afonso O, Africano AP (2012) Which manufacturing firms learn by exporting? J Int Trade Econ Devel. doi:10.1080/09638199.2010.534811
  32. The International Study Group on Exports and Productivity (ISGEP) (2007) Exports and productivity: comparable evidence from 14 countries. Centre for Industrial Economics, Discussion Papers, 2007-11.Google Scholar
  33. Tirole J (2003) The theory of industrial organization. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, fourteenth printingGoogle Scholar
  34. Tucci A (2005) Trade, foreign networks and performance: a firm-level analysis for India. Centro Studi Luca d’Agliano Development Studies Working Papers, 199, March.Google Scholar
  35. Vogel A, Wagner J (2010) Higher productivity in importing German manufacturing firms: self-selection, learning by importing, or both? Rev World Econ 145(4):641–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wagner J (2011) International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006, IZA Discussion Papers 5916, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  37. Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Armando Silva
    • 1
  • Oscar Afonso
    • 2
  • Ana Paula Africano
    • 3
  1. 1.Instituto Politécnico do Porto - ESEIGPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Faculdade de EconomiaUniversidade do Porto, CEFUP and OBEGEFPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Faculdade de EconomiaUniversidade do Porto and CEFUPPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations