Intestinal microbiome-gut-brain axis and irritable bowel syndrome

Intestinale Mikrobiom-Darm-Hirn-Achse und Reizdarmsyndrom


Psychological comorbidity is highly present in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Recent research points to a role of intestinal microbiota in visceral hypersensitivity, anxiety, and depression. Increased disease reactivity to psychological stress has been described too. A few clinical studies have attempted to identify features of dysbiosis in IBS. While animal studies revealed strong associations between stress and gut microbiota, studies in humans are rare. This review covers the most important studies on intestinal microbial correlates of psychological and clinical features in IBS, including stress, anxiety, and depression.


Psychische Komorbidität ist häufig bei Reizdarmsyndrom (RDS). Die aktuelle Forschung weist auf eine Rolle des intestinalen Mikrobioms bei der viszeralen Hypersensitivität, bei Angst und Depression hin. Eine Steigerung der Krankheitssymptomatik bei psychischem Stress wurde beschrieben. Wenige klinische Studien haben versucht, Muster einer Dysbiose für RDS zu identifizieren. Während Tierstudien eine starke Assoziation zwischen Stress und Darm-Mikrobiom aufdeckten, sind Studien beim Menschen rar. Diese Übersicht umfasst die wichtigsten Studien über Zusammenhänge zwischen dem intestinalen Mikrobiom und psychischen und klinischen Aspekten bei RDS, inklusive Stress, Angst und Depression.

The intestinal microbiome, stress and the gut–brain axis

The human intestinal system is home to about 100 trillion microbes, mainly of bacterial origin [1]. Research has ascertained a critical relevance of gut bacteria for health and disease [2, 3], and there is strong evidence suggesting they can affect emotion processing and stress coping. The concept of a gut-brain-microbiota axis connects the psyche and nervous system with the intestine, its inhabitants and its metabolic, neuroendocrine, and immune functions [4, 5].

Gut microbiota sets developmental conditions for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA-axis) maturation [6, 7]. Together with an impact on brain circuits of social cognition, reward, and emotion processing, this indicates a relevance for resilience and behavioral adaption to stress [8, 9]. Vice versa, stress can decrease the diversity and alter the composition of the gut microbiome [10, 11]. Early life stress induced by maternal separation leads to lifelong alterations in microbial composition, HPA axis functioning and visceral hypersensitivity in rodents. This has been proposed as an animal model of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) [12,13,14]. Loss of intestinal epithelial barrier function is another focus of research on the relationship between stress and microbiota. Suspected to provoke inflammatory cascades, autoimmunity, and pain, “leaky gut” can be both cause and consequence of psychological stress [15,16,17].

Intestinal microbiome, inflammation and psychological disorders

Another strong link between intestinal microbiota and psychological health is based on the “inflammation hypothesis” of psychiatric disease [18, 19]. Bacterial pathogens can initiate inflammatory reactions [20] or modulate inflammatory processes via metabolites (e. g., short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)) [21, 22]. Furthermore, gut bacteria are involved in the metabolism of key neurotransmitters such as serotonin [5], and seem to intervene in the turnover of neuronal growth factors related to cognition and brain health, e. g. brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [23, 24]. Microbiota-dependent effects on mouse reward circuitry [25], and probiotics associated alterations of emotion-processing brain activity in humans [26] have been reported.

Behavioral alterations (anxiety and depression-like behavior) by manipulations of the microbiome were demonstrated in seminal animal studies [27,28,29]. Recently, socially avoidant behavior, paralleled by decreased myelinization in the prefrontal cortex, was ascribed to bacteria-mediated epigenetic modulations in mice [30]. In humans, Lin and colleagues [31] found significant differences in the composition of the gut microbiome between patients suffering from major depressive disorders and controls, displaying a dysbalanced Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio and higher abundance of Streptococcus, Klebsiella, Prevotella, and Clostridium XI in depressive patients.

Those results contrast with the findings of Jiang and colleagues [32]. Although reporting the same higher Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio, they observed different associations between taxa and major depressive disorder. Faecalibacterium was inversely correlated with symptoms severity, and an association between Clostridium cluster XIV and BDNF serum concentrations was observed.

In healthy women, however, no association between microbial features and psychological parameters could be found [33]. Further studies will have to determine the precise role of the microbiome within the range of normal behavior to pathophysiology in psychiatric illness.

Irritable bowel syndrome and microbiome–brain interaction

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder with an estimated prevalence in the general population of 5 to 20% [34]. IBS is defined with following diagnostic criteria (ROME IV) [35]: recurrent abdominal pain, on average at least one day per week in the last 3 months. The pain should be related to defecation and associated with a change in frequency and in form (appearance) of stool.

IBS can be seen as a “stress disease” [36], and has been studied from different perspectives, at virtually all levels of the gut-brain-microbiome axis. There is evidence for HPA axis and autonomous nervous system involvement [37, 38], maladaptive coping and resilience [39,40,41], comorbidity of anxiety and depression [42], increased interoception [43] and altered neuronal pain processing [44, 45]. Host–microbe interactions in the gut are important elements in the pathogenesis of IBS and other functional gastrointestinal diseases [46].

A variety of methods have been used to assess the human intestinal microbiota in IBS and this might be one reason (along with different diets, lifestyles, and geographical factors) why results are contradictory and difficult to summarize. Many studies have attempted to identify microbiota discriminating IBS patients from healthy controls, and to define dysbiosis in IBS and its sub-populations [47, 48]. However, a widely accepted concept of bacterial dysbiosis in IBS has not yet been established, since a large proportion of IBS patients display a “normal-like” microbiota profile [49, 50]. Associations between clinical parameters and microbiota profiles assessed by classic ecological methods have remained largely elusive, but some bacteria stand out. A dysbalanced Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio [49, 51], an increase in Clostridium XIVa and Ruminococcus [52], a reduction in Bifidobacterium [46, 52, 53], as well as a reduction in methanogens and butyrate- (a SCFA) producing bacteria in IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D) and IBS with diarrhea and constipation (mixed, IBS-M) patients [51, 54].

Some enterotypes and associations with clinical phenotypes have also been described: Prevotella-predominant enterotype seemed to be more common in healthy subjects, Bacteroides enterotype was more represented in IBS patients, while the Clostridiales-dominant enterotype was associated with faster colonic transit time. IBS severity could also be predicted by a complex microbial signature, consisting of bacterial families disseminated over the whole phylogenetic tree [54].

Intestinal microbiota and psychological profiles in IBS

Jeffery and colleagues [49], comparing the fecal microbiota of IBS patients with non-IBS individuals, separated their IBS cohort into three main clusters: a “normal-like” cluster with microbial characteristics highly similar to healthy controls and two “IBS clusters,” the latter characterized by high Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio. They also tested for associations between clinical variables and microbial composition, and found that depression was the single clinical feature that segregated in parallel with microbiota composition. Interestingly, depression was increased in patients belonging to the “normal-like” cluster.

Those findings are corroborated by Liu and colleagues [55], who observed that the fecal microbiome of IBS patients presented strong similarities to that of depressive patients. Sundin et al. [56] published data that distinguished the intestinal microbiota of post-infectious IBS patients from that of both general IBS patients and healthy controls. They also observed that altered fecal and mucosal microbial composition in post-infectious IBS patients correlated with psychological distress. Jeffery et al. [49] cautiously interpreted this pattern as more “physically-triggered” versus more “centrally-triggered” IBS. Our own dataFootnote 1 also strongly suggest that variables of psychological distress are associated with systematic microbial differences. Another recent study also found two clusters of IBS patients carrying either normal-like microbiomes or altered microbiomes. Here it was found that bacteria that carried metagenes involved in neurotransmitter metabolism correlated with morphological brain variations [57]. The pathways through which the gut microbiome affects the nervous system remain to be understood. However, some results point to western diet as a possible confounding factor: it affects the microbiota and its SCFA production, as well as the gut barrier integrity, and is associated with neuroinflammation and alteration of brain insulin sensitivity [58].

Therapeutic interventions are therefore possible from both ends of the spectrum: the brain and the gut microbiome. Antidepressants, psychotherapy and gut-directed hypnosis are effective, especially in refractory IBS [59, 60]. Until now, however, limited results are available from trials assessing the effectiveness of diet, prebiotics, probiotics, and antibiotics in IBS patients [61, 62].


The gut microbiota forms a crucial link in the bidirectional interactions between the intestine and the nervous system. Some alterations, like psychological distress or gastrointestinal infections, can affect these interactions and contribute to the development and/or affect the course of IBS. Symptomatic therapies such as IBS-type related medication, phytopharmacology, diet, probiotics and psychological interventions including gut directed hypnosis are recommended.

Further randomized clinical trials are needed to identify those IBS patients who will profit more from a) therapies that modulate the gut microbiome (prebiotics, probiotics, antibiotics), b) psychological interventions (psychotherapy, gut-directed hypnosis, antidepressants), or c) both approaches within an integrated psychosomatic care.


  1. 1.

    Abstract accepted for presentation at the United Gastroenterology Week 2017: Peter et al., Psychological distress is associated with gut microbial differences in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.


  1. 1.

    Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science. 2006;312(5778):1355–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cho I, Blaser MJ. The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(4):260–70.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Shreiner AB, Kao JY, Young VB. The gut microbiome in health and in disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31(1):69–75.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cryan JF, O’Mahony SM. The microbiome-gut-brain axis: from bowel to behavior. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23(3):187–92.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, et al. Kynurenine pathway metabolism and the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Neuropharmacology. 2017;112(Pt B):399–412.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Clarke G, Grenham S, Scully P, et al. The microbiome-gut-brain axis during early life regulates the hippocampal serotonergic system in a sex-dependent manner. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18(6):666–73.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol. 2004;558(Pt 1):263–75.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Feder A, Charney D, Collins K. Neurobiology of resilience. In: Southwick SM, Litz BT, Charney D, Friedman MJ, editors. Resilience and mental health: challenges across the lifespan. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press; 2011. pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    McEwen BS, Gray J, Nasca C. Recognizing resilience: learning from the effects of stress on the brain. Neurobiol Stress. 2015;1:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bharwani A, Mian MF, Foster JA, et al. Structural & functional consequences of chronic psychosocial stress on the microbiome & host. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;63:217–27.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Galley JD, Bailey MT. Impact of stressor exposure on the interplay between commensal microbiota and host inflammation. Gut Microbes. 2014;5(3):390–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Regulation of the stress response by the gut microbiota: implications for psychoneuroendocrinology. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37(9):1369–78.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Moloney RD, O’Mahony SM, Dinan TG, et al. Stress-induced visceral pain: toward animal models of irritable-bowel syndrome and associated comorbidities. Front Psychiatry. 2015;6:15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    O’Mahony SM, Marchesi JR, Scully P, et al. Early life stress alters behavior, immunity, and microbiota in rats: implications for irritable bowel syndrome and psychiatric illnesses. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65(3):263–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chang Y‑M, El-Zaatari M, Kao JY. Does stress induce bowel dysfunction? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;8(6):583–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kelly JR, Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, et al. Breaking down the barriers: the gut microbiome, intestinal permeability and stress-related psychiatric disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:392.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Soderholm JD, Perdue MH. Stress and gastrointestinal tract. II. Stress and intestinal barrier function. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280(1):G7–G13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hall SB, Jones LK, Tyson L, et al. The inflammatory hypothesis of depression: implications for diagnosis and practice. J Ment Health Couns. 2016;38(2):124–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Maes M, Yirmyia R, Noraberg J, et al. The inflammatory & neurodegenerative (I&ND) hypothesis of depression: leads for future research and new drug developments in depression. Metab Brain Dis. 2009;24(1):27–53.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Caballero S, Pamer EG. Microbiota-mediated inflammation and antimicrobial defense in the intestine. Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33:227–56.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Maslowski KM, Mackay CR. Diet, gut microbiota and immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(1):5–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Richards JL, Yap YA, McLeod KH, et al. Dietary metabolites and the gut microbiota: an alternative approach to control inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Clin Transl Immunology. 2016;5(5):e82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bercik P, Denou E, Collins J, et al. The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(2):599–609.e3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Stilling RM, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Microbial genes, brain & behaviour - epigenetic regulation of the gut-brain axis. Genes Brain Behav. 2014;13(1):69–86.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kiraly DD, Walker DM, Calipari ES, et al. Alterations of the host microbiome affect behavioral responses to cocaine. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35455.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tillisch K, Labus J, Kilpatrick L, et al. Consumption of fermented milk product with probiotic modulates brain activity. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(7):1394–1401.e4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Foster JA, McVey Neufeld K‑A. Gut-brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36(5):305–12.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Goehler LE, Park SM, Opitz N, et al. Campylobacter jejuni infection increases anxiety-like behavior in the holeboard: possible anatomical substrates for viscerosensory modulation of exploratory behavior. Brain Behav Immun. 2008;22(3):354–66.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zheng P, Zeng B, Zhou C, et al. Gut microbiome remodeling induces depressive-like behaviors through a pathway mediated by the host’s metabolism. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(6):786–96.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gacias M, Gaspari S, Santos P‑MG, et al. Microbiota-driven transcriptional changes in prefrontal cortex override genetic differences in social behavior. eLife. 2016; doi:10.7554/elife.13442.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lin P, Ding B, Feng C, et al. Prevotella and Klebsiella proportions in fecal microbial communities are potential characteristic parameters for patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2017;207:300–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jiang H, Ling Z, Zhang Y, et al. Altered fecal microbiota composition in patients with major depressive disorder. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;48:186–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kleiman SC, Bulik-Sullivan EC, Glenny EM, et al. The gut-brain axis in healthy females: lack of significant association between microbial composition and diversity with psychiatric measures. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(1):e0170208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(5):1377–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mearin F, Lacy BE, Chang L, et al. Bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(6):1393–1407.e5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mayer EA, Naliboff BD, Chang L, et al. V. Stress and irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280(4):G519–G24.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Quigley EMM, et al. A sustained hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response to acute psychosocial stress in irritable bowel syndrome. Psychol Med. 2014;44(14):3123–34.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Pellissier S, Dantzer C, Mondillon L, et al. Relationship between vagal tone, cortisol, TNF-alpha, epinephrine and negative affects in Crohn’s disease and irritable bowel syndrome. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(9):e105328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kilpatrick LA, Gupta A, Love AD, et al. Neurobiology of psychological resilience in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(4):S-774. Abstr Mo2030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Knowles SR, Austin DW, Sivanesan S, et al. Relations between symptom severity, illness perceptions, visceral sensitivity, coping strategies and well-being in irritable bowel syndrome guided by the common sense model of illness. Psychol Health Med. 2017;22(5):524–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Stanculete MF, Matu S, Pojoga C, et al. Coping strategies and irrational beliefs as mediators of the health-related quality of life impairments in irritable bowel syndrome. J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2015;24(2):159–64.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fond G, Loundou A, Hamdani N, et al. Anxiety and depression comorbidities in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014;264(8):651–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Moloney RD, Johnson AC, O’Mahony SM, et al. Stress and the microbiota-gut-brain axis in visceral pain: relevance to irritable bowel syndrome. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2016;22(2):102–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Claassen J, Labrenz F, Ernst TM, et al. Altered cerebellar activity in visceral pain-related fear conditioning in irritable bowel syndrome. Cerebellum. 2016;16(2):508–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Schmid J, Langhorst J, Gass F, et al. Placebo analgesia in patients with functional and organic abdominal pain: a fMRI study in IBS, UC and healthy volunteers. Gut. 2015;64(3):418–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Simren M, Barbara G, Flint HJ, et al. Intestinal microbiota in functional bowel disorders: a Rome foundation report. Gut. 2013;62(1):159–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Casen C, Vebo HC, Sekelja M, et al. Deviations in human gut microbiota: a novel diagnostic test for determining dysbiosis in patients with IBS or IBD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42(1):71–83.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Jalanka J, Salonen A, Fuentes S, et al. Microbial signatures in post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome--toward patient stratification for improved diagnostics and treatment. Gut Microbes. 2015;6(6):364–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Jeffery IB, O’Toole PW, Ohman L, et al. An irritable bowel syndrome subtype defined by species-specific alterations in faecal microbiota. Gut. 2012;61(7):997–1006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jeffery I, O’Toole P, Fraher M, et al. Alterations in the microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome; a comparison of two geographically distinct cohorts. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(4):S63. Abstr 260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pozuelo M, Panda S, Santiago A, et al. Reduction of butyrate- and methane-producing microorganisms in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12693.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rajilic-Stojanovic M, Jonkers DM, Salonen A, et al. Intestinal microbiota and diet in IBS: causes, consequences, or epiphenomena? Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(2):278–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Mayer EA, Savidge T, Shulman RJ. Brain-gut microbiome interactions and functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(6):1500–12.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Tap J, Derrien M, Tornblom H, et al. Identification of an intestinal microbiota signature associated with severity of irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(1):111–123.e8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Liu Y, Zhang L, Wang X, et al. Similar fecal microbiota signatures in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and patients with depression. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(11):1602–1611.e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sundin J, Rangel I, Fuentes S, et al. Altered faecal and mucosal microbial composition in post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome patients correlates with mucosal lymphocyte phenotypes and psychological distress. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41(4):342–51.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Labus JS, Hollister EB, Jacobs J, et al. Differences in gut microbial composition correlate with regional brain volumes in irritable bowel syndrome. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Noble EE, Hsu TM, Kanoski SE. Gut to brain dysbiosis: mechanisms linking western diet consumption, the microbiome, and cognitive impairment. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017;11:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Enck P, Junne F, Klosterhalfen S, et al. Therapy options in irritable bowel syndrome. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22(12):1402–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Moser G, Tragner S, Gajowniczek EE, et al. Long-term success of GUT-directed group hypnosis for patients with refractory irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(4):602–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Dapoigny M, Piche T, Ducrotte P, et al. Efficacy and safety profile of LCR35 complete freeze-dried culture in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized, double-blind study. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(17):2067–75.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Han K, Wang J, Seo J‑G, et al. Efficacy of double-coated probiotics for irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. J Gastroenterol. 2016;52(4):432–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Univ. Prof. Dr. Gabriele Moser MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

G. Moser, C. Fournier, and J. Peter declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moser, G., Fournier, C. & Peter, J. Intestinal microbiome-gut-brain axis and irritable bowel syndrome. Wien Med Wochenschr 168, 62–66 (2018).

Download citation


  • Stress
  • Psyche
  • Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Enterotype


  • Stress
  • Psyche
  • Depression
  • Angststörung
  • Enterotyp