Skip to main content
Log in

Psychosocial aspects associated with use of sunscreen, natural sunlight exposure, and artificial tanning

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Natural and artificial tanning have become very popular in Western culture, yet at the same time, there is still a psychodermatology concern for this activity. Not much has been examined with the psychological aspects of tanning and sunscreen use. The purpose of this study is to examine the psychosocial effects associated with sun protection, natural, and artificial tanning among individuals 18 years old or older visiting the University of Miami Dermatology Outpatient Clinic. We distributed a survey on tanning and sunscreen use to 150 dermatology outpatients, hospital employees, and hospital visitors for three weeks during June/July 2015 asking about how often they tan, use sunscreen, and how they feel about this topic. Demographics, such as gender, ethnicity, and education were taken into consideration to examine the different responses in each category. Our results suggest that people’s perception to tanning and sunscreen use have evolved over time. Most people in South Florida nowadays feel guilty when exposed to natural sunlight without sunscreen and do not tan frequently. The majority of the people, specifically women, utilize the recommended amount of sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 30–50. However, we can conclude that communication between social media and the general public can affect people’s decision-making on tanning and sunscreen use with physician advice being the most effective method of encouraging people to use sunscreen. This study will add to the growing knowledge about psychodermatology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hartman AM, Guy GP Jr, Holman DM, Saraiya M, Plescia M. Use of indoor tanning devices by adults – United States, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report US Government Printing Office. 2012;61:323.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pagoto SL, Lemon SC, Oleski JL, et al. Availability of tanning beds on US college campuses. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayer JA, Woodruff SI, Slymen DJ, et al. Adolescents’ use of indoor tanning: A large-scale evaluation of psychosocial, environmental, and policy-level correlates. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:930–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel S, Patel T, Franca K. Psychology behind the use of sunscreens, tanning and skin cancer prevention. In: Sharp S, editor. Sunscreens: Properties, role in skin cancer prevention and health effects. New York, NY: Nova Science; 2015. pp. 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keesling B, Friedman HS. Psychosocial factors in sunbathing and sunscreen use. Health Psychol. 1987;6:477–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson KM, Aiken LS. A psychosocial model of sun protection and sunbathing in young women: the impact of health beliefs, attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy for sun protection. Health Psychol. 2000;19:469–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bandi P, Cokkinides VE, Weinstock MA, Ward E. Sunburns, sun protection and indoor tanning behaviors, and attitudes regarding sun protection benefits and tan appeal among parents of U.S. adolescents-1998 compared to 2004. pediatric Dermatology. 2010;27:9–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wollina U, Helm C, Bennewitz A, Koch R, Schaff K, Burroni M. Interventional three-year longitudinal study of melanocytic naevus development in pre-school children in Dresden, Saxony. Acta Derm Venereol. 2014;94(1):63–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hassan J, Grogan S, Clark-Carter D, Richards H, Yates VM. The individual health burden of acne: Appearance-related distress in male and female adolescents and adults with back, chest and facial acne. J Health Psychol. 2009;14:1105–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abroms L, Jorgensen CM, Southwell BG, Geller AC, Emmons KM. Gender differences in young adults’ beliefs about Sunscreen use. health Educ Behav. 2003;30:29–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernandez C, Calero D, Robinson G, Mermelstein R, Robinson JK. Comparison of sunscreen availability in Chicago Hispanic and non-Hispanic neighborhoods. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2012;28:244–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cox CR, Cooper DP, Vess M, Arndt J, Goldenberg JL, Routledge C. Bronze is beautiful but pale can be pretty: The effects of appearance standards and mortality salience on sun-tanning outcomes. Health Psychol. 2009;28:746–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rasmussen S, O’Connor RC. Factors influencing anticipated decisions about Sunscreen use. J Health Psychol. 2005;10:585–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heckman CJ, Coups EJ, Manne SL. Prevalence and correlates of indoor tanning among U.S. adults. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5):769–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Basch CE, Neugut AI. Improving understanding about tanning behaviors in college students: A pilot study. J Am Coll Health. 2012;60:250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolpowitz D, Gilchrest BA. The vitamin D questions: How much do you need and how should you get it? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:301–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Poorsattar S. UV light abuse and high-risk tanning behavior among undergraduate college students. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56:375–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Carol B. Kittles (Research Coordinator, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA) for assisting with the protocol guidelines for the IRB submission. Ms. Kittles has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katlein França MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

J. Ventenilla, K. França, T. Lotti, and J. Keri declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ventenilla, J., França, K., Lotti, T. et al. Psychosocial aspects associated with use of sunscreen, natural sunlight exposure, and artificial tanning. Wien Med Wochenschr 168, 236–242 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0541-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0541-y

Keywords

Navigation