Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Komplikationsklassifikation nach Clavien-Dindo am Beispiel der radikalen Prostatektomie

The Clavien-Dindo classification of complications used for radical prostatectomy

  • Published:
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Das Ziel der aktuellen Studie war die Evaluierung perioperativer Komplikationen unter Verwendung der Clavien-Dindo Komplikationsklassifikation zum Vergleich zwischen retropubischer, endoskopischer und roboter-assistierter radikaler Protatektomie mithilfe einer prospektiv erhobenen Datenbank.

Anhand dieser Ergebnisse führte die Implementierung der roboter-assistierten radikalen Prostatektomie an unserer Abteilung zu einer Abnahme geringgradiger Komplikationen im Vergleich zu den anderen beiden Methoden. Schwergradige Komplikationen traten in allen drei Gruppen gleich häufig auf.

Summary

The objective of the present study was to evaluate perioperative complications between retropubic, endoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on basis of a prospective maintained database using the Clavien-Dindo classification of complications.

According to our results, implementation of the radical robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy shows a trend to a decrease of minor complications compared to retropubic and endoscopic radical prostatectomy. Major complications are comparable between all three procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitropolous et al. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol. 2012;61:341.

  4. Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Shariat SF, Stolzenburg J-U, Van Poppel H, Zattoni F, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Wilson TG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:431–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Urologie und Andrologie, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Johannes von Gott Platz 1, 1020, Wien, Österreich

    Manuela Hiess, Anton Ponholzer, Michael Lamche, Paul Schramek & Christian Seitz

  2. Urologische Universitätsklinik, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich

    Manuela Hiess & Christian Seitz

Authors
  1. Manuela Hiess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anton Ponholzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Lamche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul Schramek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christian Seitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela Hiess.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hiess, M., Ponholzer, A., Lamche, M. et al. Die Komplikationsklassifikation nach Clavien-Dindo am Beispiel der radikalen Prostatektomie. Wien Med Wochenschr 164, 297–301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-014-0264-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-014-0264-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation