Skip to main content
Log in

Ablauforganisation – unfallchirurgisches und anästhesiologisches Management bei Hüftfrakturen

Procedural organisation: surgical and anaesthesiological management in hip fractures

  • themenschwerpunkt
  • Published:
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die allgemeinen und speziellen Komplikationen bei Patienten mit hüftnahen Frakturen, wie auch die in der Folge resultierende Beeinträchtigung der Mobilität und der kognitiven Funktion, lassen sich durch einen strukturierten Ablauf von Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation, basierend auf einem multidisziplinären Behandlungspfad, reduzieren.

In der initialen Phase liegt der Fokus nach der Sicherung der Diagnose und dem Einleiten einer adäquaten Schmerztherapie auf der Erfassung der allgemeinen Risikofaktoren, der kognitiven Funktion und einem geriatrischen Screening. Die Indikation zur Operation und die Festlegung der Operationsmethode (totale oder teilweise Hüftprothese, Osteosynthese) werden von unfallchirurgischer Seite vorgegeben. Die unfallchirurgische Therapieentscheidung orientiert sich, abgesehen vom Frakturtyp, am Alter des Patienten, seiner kognitiven Funktion, der vorbestehenden Mobilität bzw. dem funktionellen Anspruch und der Operationstauglichkeit. Im Mittelpunkt der anästhesiologischen Evaluierung steht die Risikostratifzierung für den Patienten hinsichtlich der Operationstauglichkeit und die Frage, ob wesentliche Grunderkrankungen in einem definierten Zeitraum (24 bis maximal 48 h) verbessert werden können. Die präoperative Diagnostik und eventuell erforderliche Interventionen sind interdisziplinär zu koordinieren. Postoperativ erfolgt eine weitere Evaluierung hinsichtlich der Lebensumstände des Patienten vor dem Sturzereignis, des Ernährungszustandes, des weiteren Versorgungsbedarfs sowie hinsichtlich sturzspezifischer Medikamente, die Osteoporosetherapie und ein Delir-Screening.

Summary

In patients with hip fractures, in order to reduce the high number of general complications and those associated with the specific treatment, the functional loss and cognitive impairment, implementation of co-ordinated, multidisciplinary treatment pathways, and rehabilitation, is mandatory. The imminent treatment of proximal femoral fracture consists of major orthopaedic surgery in most cases (total or partial hip arthroplasty, osteosynthesis). After the diagnosis of a hip fracture, an adequate pain medication should be initiated. The decison making for the fracture treatment includes fracture type, patient’s age, cognitive function, mobility before the fall and functional demands of the patient in the context of patients life expectancy and goals of care. The anaesthesiological evaluation focuses on risk assessment. Medical abnormalities should be optimized within 24 to 48 h, or an increased perioperative risk due to comorbidities has to be accepted. The timing and the course of further preoperative diagnostic examinations and therapeutic interventions should be co-ordinated between the involved medical disciplines. After the operation a structured screening for delirium should be initiated and further evaluation of patient’s nutrition, fall-associated medication, living conditions and osteoporosis treatment has to be performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Al-Ani AN, Flodin L, Söderqvist A, et al. Does rehabilitation matter in patients with femoral neck fracture and cognitive impairment? A prospective study of 246 patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(1):51–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Antapur P, Mohamed N, Gandhi R. Fractures in the elderly: when is hip replacement a necessity? Clin Interv Aging. 2011;6:1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azegami S, Gurusamy KS, Parker MJ. Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Hip Int. 2011;21(5):209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker RP, Squires B, Gargan MF, Bannister CG. Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, indepent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(12):2583–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beaupre LA, Cinats JG, Senthilselvan A, et al. Reduced morbidity for elderly patients with a hip fracture after implementation of a perioperative evidence-based clinical pathway. Qual Safe Health Care. 2006;15(5):375–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bentley G. Treatment of nondisplaced fractures of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1980;152:93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34(7):859–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint contact forces during stumbling. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389(1):53–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blomfeldt R, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, Söderqvist A, Tidermark J. Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients with severe cognitive impairment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(4):523–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blomfeldt R, Törnkvist H, Eriksson K, Söderqvist A, Ponzer S, Tidermark J. A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;88(2):160–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brauer C, Morrison RS, Silberzweig SB, Siu AL. The cause of delirium in patients with hip fracture. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1856–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cameron ID, Handoll HH, Finnegan T, Madhok R, Langhorne P. Co-ordinated multidisciplinary approaches for inpatient rehabilitation of older patients with proximal femoral fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD 000106. Review.

  13. Chacko AT, Ramirez MA, Ramappa AJ, Richardson LC, Appleton PT, Rodriguez EK. Does late night hip surgery affect outcome? J Trauma. 2011;71(2):447–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DeAngelis JP, Ademi A, Staff I, Lewis CG. Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized trial with early follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(3):135–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dortmond LM van, Douw CM, van Breukelen AM, et al. Outcome after hemi-arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture related to mental state. Injury. 2000;31(5):327–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gillespie WJ, Walenkamp GH. Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery for proximal femoral and other closed long bone fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;CD000244.

  17. Givens JL, Sanft TB, Marcantonio ER. Functional recovery after hip fracture: combined effect of depressive symptoms, cognitive impairement, and delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(6):1075–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gruber-Baldini AL, Zimmermann S, Morrison S, et al. Cognitive impairment in hip fracture patients: timing of detection and longitudinal follow-up. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(9):1227–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Halbert J, Crotty M, Whitehead C, et al. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation after hip fracture is associated with improved outcome: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(7):507–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holmberg S, Kalén R, Thorngren KG. Treatment and outcome of femoral neck fractures: an analysis of 2418 patients admitted from their own homes. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1987;218:42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johansson T, Jacobsson SA, Ivarsson I, Knutsson A, Wahlström O. Internal fixation versus total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized study of 100 hips. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(6):597–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson RG, Arozullah AM, Neumayer L, Hernderson WG, Hosokawa P, Khuri SF. Multivariable predictors of postoperative respiratory failure after gerneral and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(6):1188–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Joo HS, Wong J, Naik VN, Savoldelli GL. The value of screening preoperative chest x-rays: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52(6):568–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kamel HK, Iqbal MA, Mogallapu R, Maas D, Hoffmann RG. Time to ambulation after hip fracture surgery: relation to hospitalization outcome. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58(11):1042–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kammerlander C, Roth T, Friedman SM, et al. Ortho-geriatric service – a literature review comparing different models. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(Suppl 4):637–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kates SL, Mendelson DA, Friedman SM. The value of an organized fracture program for the elderly: early results. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;25(4):233–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF. Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty: treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88(2):249–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kostuj T, Smektala R, Schulze-Raestrup U, Müller-Mai C. Einfluss des Operationszeitpunktes und –verfahrens auf Mortalität und Frühkomplikationen der Schenkelhalsfraktur. Unfallchirurg. 2013;116(2):131–7. doi:10.1007/s00113-011-2071-1. German.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Levkoff SE, Evans DA, Liptzin B, et al. Delirium. The occurrence and persistence of symptoms among elderly hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:334–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lohmann R, Frerichmann U, Stöckle U, Riegel T, Raschke MJ. Proximale Femurfrakturen im Alter. Krankenkassendaten von über 23 Mio. Versicherten – Teil1. Unfallchirurg. 2007;110(7):603–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Michaels M, Resnick NM. Delirium is independently associated with poor functional recovery after hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(6):618–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Wright RJ, Resnick NM. Reducing delirium after hip fracture: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(5):516–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. March LM, Cameron ID, Cumming RG, et al. Mortality and morbidity after hip fracture: can evidence based clinical pathways make a difference? J Rheumatol. 2000;27(6):2227–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nowak A, Hubbard RE. Falls and frailty: lessons from complex systems. J R Soc Med. 2009;102(3):98–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Obrant KJ, Carlsson AS. Survival of hemiarthroplasties after cervical hip fractures. Orthopedics. 1987;10(8):1153–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL. ASA physical status classification: a study of consistency of ratings. Anaesthesiology. 1978;49(4):239–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Parker MJ, Gurusamy K. Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;19(3):CD001706. Review.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Replacement arthroplasty versus internal fixation for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;19(2):CD000086. Review.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;8(9):CD000093. Review.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Parker MJ, Myles JW, Anand JK, Drewett R. Cost-benefit analysis of hip fracture treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74(2):261–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Parvici J, Holiday AD, Ereth MH, Lewallen DG. The Frank Stichfield Award. Sudden death during primary total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1999;369:39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental staus questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975;23(10):433–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Poldermans D, Bax JJ, Boersma E, et al. Guidelines for preoperative cardic risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(22):2769–812.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pompei P, Foreman M, Rudberg MA, et al. Delirium in hospitalized older persons: outcomes and predictors. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:809–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Roberts HC, Pickering RM, Onslow E, et al. The effectiveness of implementing a care pathway for femoral neck fractures in older people: a prospective controlled before and after study. Age Ageing. 2004;33(2):178–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG. Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331. doi:10.1136/bmj.38643.663843.55.

  47. Samelson EJ, Zhang Y, Kiel DP, Hannan MT, Felson DT. Effect of birth cohort on risk of hip fracture: age-specific incidence rates in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(5):858–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, et al. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systemetic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2010;182(15):1609–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Siu AL, Penrod JD, Boockvar KS, Koval K, Strauss E, Morrison RS. Early ambulation after hip fracture: effects on function and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(7):766–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Smektala R, Endres HG, Dasch B, et al. The effect of time-to-surgery on outcome in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures. BMC Muskoskelet Disord. 2008;9:171. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-171.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Söderqvist A, Miedel R, Ponzer S, Tidermark J. The influence of cognitive function on outcome after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(10):2115–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Söderqvist A, Ekström W, Ponzer S, et al. Stockholm Hip Fracture Group. Prediction of mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures: a two-year prospective study of 1,944 patients. Gerontology. 2009;55(5):496–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Southwell-Keely JP, Russo RR, March L, Cumming R, Cameron I, Brnabic AJ. Antibiotic prophylaxis in hip fracture surgery: a metaanalysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;419:179–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Stafford GH, Charman SC, Borroff MJ, Newell C, Tucker JK. Total hip replacement for the treatment of acute femoral neck fractures: results from the national joint registry of England and Wales at 3–5 years after surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94:193–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Stolee P, Poss J, Cook RJ, Byrne K, Hirdes JP. Risk factors for hip fracture in older home car clients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64(3):403–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Strömberg L, Lindgren U, Nordin C, Öhlen G, Svensson O. The appearance and disappearance of cognitive impairment in elderly patients during treatment for hip fracture. Scand J Caring Sci. 1997;11(3):167–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Thaler HW, Frisee F, Korninger C. Platelet aggregation inhibitors, platelet function testing, and blood loss in hip fracture surgery. J Trauma. 2010;69(5):1217–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Tidermark J, Ponzer S, Svensson O, et al. Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(3):380–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Timperley AJ, Whitehouse SL. Mitigating surgical risk in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for fractures of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(7):851–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Vidán MT, Sánchez E, Gracia Y, Marañón E, Vaquero J, Serra JA. Causes and effects of surgical delay in patients with hip fracture: a cohort study. Ann Int Med. 2011;155(4):226–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wafaisade A, Paffrath T, Flohé S. Neue orale Antikoagulanzien. Unfallchirurg. 2013;116(1):90–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Weltermann A, Brodmann M, Domanovits H, et al. Dabigatran in patients with atrial fibrillation: perioperative and periinterventional management. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012;124(9–10):340–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Wu WC, Schifftner TL, Henderson WG, et al. Preoperative hematocrit levels and postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 2007;297(22):2481–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. www.awmf.org/ Schenkelhalsfraktur des Erwachsenen. Zugegriffen 4. März. 2013.

  65. www.awmf.org/ Pertrochantäre Oberschenkelfraktur. Zugegriffen 4. März. 2013.

  66. www.bqs-qualitätsindikatoren.de/2008. Zugegriffen 4. März. 2013.

  67. www.oegari.at Arbeitsgruppe perioperative Gerinnung der ÖGARI. Zugegriffen 4. März. 2013.

  68. www.oegari.at Quellleitlinie zur präoperativen Patientenevaluierung. Zugegriffen 4. März. 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernst J. Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, E., Gerstorfer, I., Dovjak, P. et al. Ablauforganisation – unfallchirurgisches und anästhesiologisches Management bei Hüftfrakturen. Wien Med Wochenschr 163, 435–441 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-013-0249-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-013-0249-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation