Zusammenfassung
Die Anzahl älterer Patienten an der Nierenersatztherapie ist kontinuierlich im Steigen begriffen. Komorbiditäten und Gebrechlichkeit dieser Patientengruppe führen zu geringer Toleranz gegenüber dem am häufigsten angewandten Verfahren, der Hämodialyse im Zentrum. Die Peritonealdialyse als Heimdialyseverfahren erfordert, selbstständig durchgeführt, jedoch ein Mindestmaß an körperlichen und kognitiven Fähigkeiten und bleibt aus diesem Grund vielen älteren Patienten vorenthalten. Professionelle Assistenz bei der Durchführung des Verfahrens ermöglicht dieser Patientengruppe eine Nierenersatztherapie von hoher Qualität in häuslicher Umgebung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von altersspezifischen Bedürfnissen und Lebensqualität.
Die Ergebnisse des assistierten Peritonealdialyseprogrammes im Landesklinikum St. Pölten zeigen eine qualitativ hochwertige Nierenersatztherapie mit geringen Komplikations- und Hospitalisationsraten ohne dass Mehrkosten gegenüber der konventionellen Hämodialysebehandlung entstehen.
Summary
The number of elderly patients with end stage renal disease is constantly increasing. Conventional hämodiaylsis as the mainstay of renal replacement therapy is often poorly tolerated by frail eldery patients with multiple comorbidities. Although many of these patients would prefer a home based dialysis treatment, the number of elderly patients using peritoneal dialysis (PD) is still low. Impaired physical and cognitive function often generates insurmountable barriers for self care peritoneal dialysis.
Assisted peritoneal dialysis can overcome many of these barriers and give elderly patients the ability of a renal replacement therapy in their own homes respecting their needs.
Literatur
Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA. 2007;298(17):2038–47.
Browne GM, Eustace JA, Fitzgerald AP, et al. Prevalence of diminished kidney function in a representative sample of middle and older age adults in the Irish population. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13(1):144.
Österreichisches Dialyse und Transplantationsregister Jahresbericht. 2011. http\\:www.nephro.at.
France REIN Registry. 2005. Annual report. http://www.soc-nephrologie.org/PDF/enephro/registres/rapport_2005/rapport_2005.pdf.
USRDS. 2008. data report. http://www.usrds.org/2008/ref/pdf/V2 03 2008.pdf.
Wilhelm-Leen ER, Hall YN, K Tamura M, et al. Frailty and chronic kidney disease: the third National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey. Am J Med. 2009;122(7):664–71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.01.026.
Cook WL, Jassal SV. Functional dependencies among the elderly on hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2008;73:1289–95.
Jassal SV, Chiu E, Hladunewich M. Loss of independence in patients starting dialysis at 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1612–3.
Kurella Tamura M, Covinsky KE, Chertow GM, et al. Functional status of elderly adults before and after initiation of dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(16):1539–47.
Kurella Tamura M, Wadley V, et al. Kidney function and cognitive impairment in US adults: the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2008;52:227–34.
Kurella Tamura M, Yaffe K. Dementia and cognitive impairment in ESRD: diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Kidney Int. 2011;79:14–22.
Moist LM, Bragg-Gresham JL, Pisoni RL, et al. Travel time to dialysis as a predictor of health-related quality of life, adherence, and mortality: the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;14:641–50.
Lindsay RM, Heidenheim PA, Nesrallah G, et al. Minutes to recovery after a hemodialysis session: a simple health-related quality of life question that is reliable, valid, and sensitive to change. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(5):952–9.
Jaber BL, Lee Y, Collins AJ, et al. Effect of daily hemodialysis on depressive symptoms and postdialysis recovery time: interim report from the FREEDOM (Following Rehabilitation, Economics and Everyday-Dialysis Outcome Measurements) study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56:531–9.
Pisoni RL, Young EW, Dykstra DM, et al. Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2002;61:305–16.
Jager KJ, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, et al. Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD) Study Group: the effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43:891–9.
Szeto CC, Kwan BC, Chow KM. Peritonitis risk for older patients on peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2008;28:457–60.
Blake PG, Korbet SM, Blake R, et al. A multicenter study of noncompliance with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis exchanges in US and Canadian patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35:506–14.
Harris SAC, Lamping DL, Brown EA, et al., for the North Thames Dialysis Study Group. Dialysis modality and elderly people: effect on clinical outcomes and quality of life. Perit Dial Int. 2002;22:463–70.
Lamping DL, Constantinovici N, Roderick P, Normand C, Henderson L, Harris S, et al. Clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in the North Thames Dialysis Study of elderly people on dialysis: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2000;356:1543–50.
Kolesnyk I, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, et al. Time-dependent reasons for peritoneal dialysis technique failure and mortality. Perit Dial Int. 2010;30:170–7.
Hiramatsu M, Ishida M, Tonozuka Y, et al. Application of peritoneal dialysis in elderly patients by classifying the age into young-old, old, and oldest-old. Contrib Nephrol. 2012;177:48–56.
Lobbedez T, Verger C, Ryckelynck JP, et al. Is assisted peritoneal dialysis associated with technique survival when competing events are considered? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7(4):612–8.
Oliver MJ, Quinn RR, Richardson EP, et al. Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int. 2007;71(7):673–8.
Oliver MJ, Garg AX, Blake PG, et al. Impact of contraindications, barriers to self-care and support on incident peritoneal dialysis utilization. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(8):2737–44.
Verger C, Ryckelynck JP, Duman M, Veniez G, et al. French peritoneal dialysis registry (RDPLF): outline and main results. Kidney Int Suppl. 2006;(103):12–20.
Brown EA, Dratwa M, Povlsen JV. Assisted peritoneal dialysis—an evolving dialysis modality. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22:3091–2.
Verger C, Duman M, Durand PY, et al. Influence of autonomy and type of home assistance on the prevention of peritonitis in assisted automated peritoneal dialysis patients. An analysis of data from the French language peritoneal dialysis registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(4):1218–23.
Castrale C, Evans D, Verger C, et al. Peritoneal dialysis in elderly patients: report from the French Peritoneal Dialysis Registry (RDPLF). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(1):255–62.
Povlsen JV, Ivarsen P. Assisted automated peritoneal dialysis (AAPD) for the functionally dependent and elderly patient. Perit Dial Int. 2005;25 Suppl 3:S60–3.
Yu AW, Chau KF, Ho YW, et al. Development of the „peritoneal dialysis first“ model in Hong Kong. Perit Dial Int. 2007;27 Suppl 2:S53–5.
Dratwa M. Costs of home assistance for peritoneal dialysis: results of a European survey. Kidney Int Suppl. 2008;(108):S72–5.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.
Lhotta K, Knoll F, Mündle M. Patient support by a PD unit in different clinical situations. Perit Dial Int. 2012;32 Suppl 3:S143–58.
Schuster K, Wiesholzer M, Mittelstrasser M, et al. Assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD): a perfect treatment for elderly and disabled end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Perit Dial Int. 2010;30 Suppl 2:S65–9.
Interessenkonflikt
Der Autor gibt an, dass keine Interessenkonflikte bestehen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wiesholzer, M. Assistierte Peritonealdialyse: Nierenersatztherapie in häuslicher Umgebung für den älteren Patienten. Wien Med Wochenschr 163, 280–287 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-013-0198-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-013-0198-0