Skip to main content
Log in

Onychomycosis: modern diagnostic and treatment approaches

Onychomykose: Moderne Diagnostik und Behandlungsansätze

  • review
  • Published:
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The medical term onychomycosis should be understood as chronic infection of the nails caused by a fungus. The most common causative agents are the dermatophytes and Candida species. The less common are certain types of moulds (nondermatophyte moulds or NDMs). In approximately 60–80 % of the cases, onychomycosis is due to dermatophytes. Among dermatophytes, the most often isolated causative pathogen is Trichophyton (T.) rubrum. Other common species are T. interdigitale (formerly T. mentagrophytes), Epidermophyton floccosum, and T. tonsurans. The most significant yeasts causing onychomycosis are Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis. Predisposing factors for onychomycosis include mainly diseases such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular arterial disease, chronic venous insufficiency, polyneuropathies of diverse etiologies, and immunosuppression, e.g., myeloproliferative diseases (such as lymphoma and paraproteinemia), HIV/AIDS, etc. Other factors facilitating the fungal infection are frequent trauma in professional sportsmen, often accompanied by excessive perspiration. The diagnostic methods that are often applied in different dermatologic departments and ambulatory units are also different. This precludes the creation of a unified diagnostic algorithm that could be used everywhere as a possible standard. In most of the cases, the method of choice depends on the specialist’s individual experience. The therapeutic approach depends mostly on the fungal organism identified by the dermatologist or mycologist. This review hereby includes the conventional as well as the newest and most reliable and modern methods used for the identification of the pathogens causing onychomycosis. Moreover, detailed information is suggested, about the choice of therapeutic scheme in case whether dermatophytes, moulds, or yeasts have been identified as causative agents. A thorough discussion of the schemes and duration of the antifungal therapy in certain groups of patients have been included.

Zusammenfassung

Der medizinische Terminus Onychomykose steht für eine chronische Infektion des Nagelapparates durch einen Pilz. Zu den häufigsten verursachenden Erregern zählen Dermatophyten sowie Candida-Arten. Zahlenmäßig weniger bedeutsam sind bestimmte Schimmelpilze (nicht-Dermatophyten-Schimmelpilze oder engl. non-dermatophyte moulds). In etwa 60–80 % der Fälle wird die Onychmoykose jedoch durch Dermatophyten verursacht. Der am häufigsten isolierte Dermatophyt ist Trichophyton (T.) rubrum, weitere relevante Spezies für eine Onychomykose sind T. interdigitale (früher T. mentagrophytes, Epidermophyton floccosum) und T. tonsurans. Die wichtigsten, eine Onychomykose verursachenden Hefepilze sind Candida albicans und Candida parapsilosis. Zu den disponierenden Faktoren, die eine Onychomykose begünstigen, zählen vor allem Stoffwechselerkrankungen, wie Diabetes mellitus, aber auch Gefäßerkrankungen, wie periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit, chronisch-venöse Insuffizienz, Polyneuropathien unterschiedlicher Ätiologie und immunsupprimierende Krankheiten, z. B. myeloproliferative Neoplasien (wie z. B. Lymphome und Paraproteinämien), HIV/AIDS, etc. Weitere Faktoren, die der Entstehung einer mykotischen Nagelinfektion Vorschub leisten, sind lokale Traumen bei Profi-oder Leistungssportlern, oft vergesellschaftet mit starker Hyperhidrose. In dermatologischen Kliniken und Praxen kommen verschiedene diagnostischen Methoden zur Anwendung Ein einheitlicher diagnostischer Algorithmus wäre wünschenswert, nach wie vor ist jedoch die persönliche Erfahrung des Untersuchers entscheidend für die eingesetzten Methoden. Entscheidend ist, dass der gewählte therapeutische Ansatz im Wesentlichen vom nachgewiesenen Erreger abhängt. In dieser Übersicht wird die konventionelle Diagnostik von Onychomykosen dargestellt. Außerdem wird auf moderne und neu entwickelte labordiagnostische Methoden, die zum direkten Nachweis und zur Identifizierung der nachgewiesenen Erreger der Onychomykose Einzug in die Dermatologie und Mikrobiologie gefunden haben, eingegangen. Darüber hinaus wird auf die Auswahl der erfolgversprechendsten lokalen und systemischen Therapieformen erläutert, abhängig davon, ob Dermatophyten, Hefepilze oder Schimmelpilze nachweisbar waren. Die verschiedenen Schemata der Onychomykosetherapie für bestimmte Patientenkollektive werden ausführlich dargestellt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta AK, Jain HC, Lynde CW. Prevalence and epidemiology of onychomycosis in patients visiting physicians’ offices: a multicenter Canadian survey of 15,000 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:244–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghannoum MA, Hajjeh RA, Scher R, Konnikov N, Gupta AK, Summerbell R et al. A large scale North American study of fungal isolated from nails; the frequency of onychomycosis, fungal distribution, and antifungal susceptibility patterns. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:641–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamnerius N, Berglund J, Faergemann J. Pedal dermatophyte infection in psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150:1125–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burzykowski T, Molenberghs G, Abeck D, et al. High prevalence of foot disease in Europe; results of the Ahilese project. Mycoses. 2003;46:496–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolff K, Johnson RA, Suurmond D. Fitzpatrick’s color atlas and synopsis of clinical dermatology. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2005. p. 1004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shemer A, Nathansohn N, Kaplan B, Trau H. Toenail abnormalities and onychomycosis in chronic venous insufficiency of the legs: should we treat? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:279–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta AK, Gupta MA, Summerbell RC, et al. The epidemiology of onychomycosis: possible role of smoking and peripheral arterial disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14:466–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginter-Hanselmayer G, Weger W, Smolle J. Onychomycosis: a new emerging infectious disease in childhood population and adolescents. Report on treatment experience with terbinafine and itraconazole in 36 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:470–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zisova L, Valtchev V, Sotiriou E, Gospodinov D, Mateev G. Оnychomycosis in patients with psoriasis—a multicenter study. Mycoses. 2011;55(2):143–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leibovici V, Heirshko K, Ingber A, Westerman M, Leviatan-Strauss N, Hoshberg M. Increased prevalence of onychomycosis among psoriatic patients in Israel. Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88:31–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta AK, Lynde CW, Jain HC, et al. A higher prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriatics compared with non-psoriatics: a multicenter study. Br J Dermatol. 1997;136:786–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bristow IR, Spruce MC. Fungal foot infection, cellulitis and diabetes: a review. Diabet Med. 2009;26:548–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fletcher CL, Hay RJ, Smeeton NC. Observer agreement in recording the clinical signs of nail disease and the accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of fungal and non-fungal nail disease. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148:558–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zaias N, Tosti A, Rebell G, et al. Autosomal dominant pattern of distal subungual onychomycosis caused by Trichophyton rubrum. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34:302–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Svejgaard EL, Nilsson J. Onychomycosis in Denmark: prevalence of fungal nail infection in general practice. Mycoses. 2004;47:131–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roujeau JC, Sigurgeirsson B, Korting HC, Kerl H, Paul C. Chronic dermatomycoses of the foot as risk factors for acute bacterial cellulitis of the leg: a case-control study. Dermatology. 2004;209:301–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tchernev G, Cardoso JC, Ali MM, Patterson JW. Primary onychomycosis with granulomatous Tinea faciei. Braz J Infect Dis. 2010;14:546–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nenoff P, Mügge C, Herrmann J, Keller U. Tinea faciei incognito due to Trichophyton rubrum as a result of autoinoculation from onychomycosis. Mycoses. 2007;50 Suppl 2:20–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nenoff P, Wetzig T, Gebauer S, et al. Tinea barbae et faciei durch Trichophyton rubrum. Akt Dermatol. 1999;25:392–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Szepietowski JC, Reich A. Stigmatisation in onychomycosis patients: a population-based study. Мycoses. 2009;52:343–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Effendy I, Lecha M, Feuilhade de Chauvin M, Di Chiacchio N, Baran R. European onychomycosis observatory. Epidemiology and clinical classification of onychomycosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005;19 Suppl 1:8–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guibal F, Baran R, Duhard E, Feuilhade de Chauvin M. Epidemiology and management of onychomycosis in private dermatological practice in France. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2008;135:561–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shemer A, Trau H, Davidovici B, Grunwald MH, Amichai B. Nail sampling in onychomycosis: comparative study of curettage from three sites of the infected nail. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007;5:1108–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nenoff P, Ginter-Hanselmayer G, Tietz HJ. Fungal nail infections—an update: part 2—from the causative agent to diagnosis—conventional and molecular procedures. Hautarzt. 2012;63:130–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weinberg JM, Koestenblatt EK, Tutrone WD, Tishler HR, Najarian L. Comparison of diagnostic methods in the evaluation of onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49:193–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nenoff P, Ginter-Hanselmayer G, Tietz HJ. Fungal nail infections—an update: part 1—prevalence, epidemiology, predisposing conditions, and differential diagnosis. Hautarzt. 2012;63:30–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. El Fari M, Tietz H-J, Presber W, Sterry W, Gräser Y. Development of an oligonucleotide probe specific for Trichophyton rubrum. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141:240–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mügge C, Haustein UF, Nenoff P. Causative agents of onychomycosis—a retrospective study. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2006;4:218–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gräser Y, Scott J, Summerbell RC. The new species concept in dermatophytes—a polyphasic approach. Mycopathologia. 2008;166:239–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Heidemann S, Monod M, Gräser Y. Signature polymorphisms in the internal transcribed spacer region relevant for the differentiation of zoophilic and anthropophilic strains of Trichophyton interdigitale and other species of T. mentagrophytes sensu lato. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162:282–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nenoff P, Mügge С, Haustein UF. Differenzierung der klinisch wichtigsten Dermatophyten. Teil I: Trichophyton. Derm Prakt Dermatol. 2002;8:16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Beifuss B, Bezold G, Gottlöber P, et al. Direct detection of five common dermatophyte species in clinical samples using a rapid and sensitive 24-h PCR-ELISA technique open to protocol transfer. Mycoses. 2011;54:137–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brillowska-Dabrowska A, Saunte DM, Arendrup MC. Five-hour diagnosis of dermatophyte nail infections with specific detection of Trichophyton rubrum. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1200–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nenoff P, Herrmann J, Gräser Y. Trichophyton mentagrophytes sive interdigitale? Ein dermatophyt im wandel der zeit. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007;5:198–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kallow W, Erhard M, Shah H, Raptakis E, Welker M. Chapter 12—MALDI-TOF MS for microbial identification: years of experimental development to an established protocol. In: Shah H, Gharbia S, Encheva V, editors. Mass spectrometry for microbial proteomics. Chichester:Wiley; 2010. pp. 255–76. ISBN:978-0-470-68199-2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Stackebrandt E, Päuker О, Erhard М. Grouping myxococci (Corallococcus) strains by matrix-assisted laser desorption Ionization time-of-flight (MALDI TOF) mass spectrometry: comparison with gene sequence phylogenies. Curr Microbiol. 2005;50:71–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Donohue MJ, Smallwood АW, Pfaller S, Rodgers M, Shoemaker JA. The development of a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry-based method for the protein fingerprinting and identification of Aeromonas species using whole cells. J Microbiol Methods. 2006;65:380–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Donohue MJ, Best JM, Smallwood AW, Kostich M, Rodgers M, Shoemaker JA. Differentiation of Aeromonas isolated from drinking water distribution systems using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2007;79:1939–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pignone M, Greth KM, Cooper J, Emerson D, Tang J. Identification of mycobacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:1963–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Erhard M, Hipler UC. SARAMIS-MALDI-TOF MS analysis of Aspergillus species. Mycoses. 2007;50:352 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pföhler C, Hollemeyer K, Heinzle Е, Altmeyer W, Graeber S, Müller CS, Stark A, Jager SU, Tilgen W. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry: a new tool in diagnostic investigation of nail disorders? Exp Dermatol. 2009;18:880–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lecha M, Effendy I, Feuilhade de Chauvin M, Di Chiacchio N, Baran R. Taskforce on onychomycosis education. Treatment options-development of consensus guidelines. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005;19 Suppl 1:25–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nenoff P. Mykologie—state of the art. Kompendium Dermatol. 2010;6(1):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gupta AK, Lynch LE, Kogan N, Cooper EA. The use of an intermittent terbinafine regimen for the treatment of dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23:256–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zisova L. Fluconazole in the treatment of onychomycosis. Folia Medica. 2004;46:47–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gupta AK, Drummond-Main C, Cooper EA, Brintnell W, Piraccini BM, Tosti A. Systematic review of nondermatophyte mold onychomycosis: diagnosis, clinical types, epidemiology, and treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:494–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ling MR, Swinyer LJ, Jarrat MT, et al. Once weekly fluconazole (450 mg) for 4, 6 or 9 months of treatment for distal subungual onychomycosis of the toe nail. J Am Acad Dermotol. 1998;38(6 Pt 2):S95–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Baran R, Hay RJ. Partial surgical avulsion of the nail in onychomycosis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1985;10:413–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lai WY, Tang WY, Loo SK, Chan Y. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients undergoing nail avulsion surgery for dystrоphic nails. Hong Kong Med J. 2011;17:127–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hochman LG. Laser treatment of onychomycosis using a novel 0.65-millisecond pulsed Nd:YAG 1064-nm laser. J Cosmеt Las Ther. 2011;13:2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Landsman AS, Robbins AH, Angelini PF, et al. Treatment of mild, moderate, and severe onychomycosis using 870- and 930 nm light exposure. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010;100:166–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Manevitch Z, Lev D, Hochberg M, Palhan M, Lewis A, Enk CD. Direct antifungal effect of femtosecond laser on Trichophyton rubrum onychomycosis. Photochem Photobiol. 2010;86:476–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Borovoy M, Tracy M. Noninvasive CO2 laser fenestration improves treatment of onychomycosis. Clin Laser Mon. 1992;10:123–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rothermel E, Apfelberg DB. Carbon dioxide laser use for certain diseases of the toenails. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1987;4:809–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hohenleutner U. Innovations in dermatologic laser therapy. Hautarzt. 2010;61:410–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Aspiroz C, Fortuño Cebamanos B, Rezusta A, Paz-Cristóbal P, Domínguez-Luzón F, Gené Díaz J, Gilaberte Y. Photodynamic therapy for onychomycosis. Case report and review of the literature. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2011;28:191–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kamp H, Tietz HJ, Lutz M, Piazena H, Sowyrda P, Lademann J, Blume-Peytavi U. Antifungal effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid PDT in Trichophyton rubrum. Mycoses. 2005;48:101–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gilaberte Y, Aspiroz C, Martes MP, Alcalde V, Espinel-Ingroff A, Rezusta A. Treatment of refractory fingernail onychomycosis caused by nondermatophyte molds with methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:669–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Watanabe D, Kawamura C, Masuda Y, Akita Y, Tamada Y, Matsumoto Y. Successful treatment of toenail onychomycosis with photodynamic therapy. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:19–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sotiriou E, Koussidou-Eremonti T, Chaidemenos G, Apalla Z, Ioannides D. Photodynamic therapy for distal and lateral subungual toenail onychomycosis caused by trichophyton rubrum: preliminary results of a single-centre open trial. Acta Derm Venereol. 2010;90:216–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Petranyi G, Ryder NS, Stutz A. Allylamine derivatives: new class of synthetic antifungal agents inhibiting fungal squalene epoxidase. Science. 1984;224:1239–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ryder NS, Favre B. Antifungal activity and mechanism of action of terbinafine. Rev Contemp Pharmacother. 1997;8:275–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Ryder NS, Wagner S, Leitner I. In vitro activities of terbinafine against cutaneous isolates of Candida albicans and other pathogenic yeasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1057–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgi Tchernev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tchernev, G., Penev, P., Nenoff, P. et al. Onychomycosis: modern diagnostic and treatment approaches. Wien Med Wochenschr 163, 1–12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-012-0139-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-012-0139-3

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation