Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gallengangsprobleme – durch technische Entwicklungen zu verändertem Patientenmanagement

Influence of technical advancements on the management of biliary tract diseases

  • Themenschwerpunkt
  • Published:
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Modern cross sectional imaging methods like CT and MRCP have replaced more invasive methods for the diagnosis of cholangiolithiasis as well as benign and malignant biliary strictures. Only if a histologic or cytologic confirmation of the diagnosis is necessary, is a direct access to the biliary tract either with ERC or PTC justified as a diagnostic procedure. Due to technical advancements in laparoscopic surgery intraoperative bile duct revision has become a standard procedure for patients with choledocholithiasis discovered during cholecystectomy. It has been shown to be equally effective to ERC. In this setting ERC therefore has lost its unique claim for the treatment of bile duct stones, while it remains the treatment of choice in patients with prior cholecystectomy. In contrast ERC, sometimes in combination with PTC, has become the mainstay in the treatment of biliary lesions like leakage and benign strictures. The same is true for the palliation of malignant biliary strictures. Surgery should be reserved for patients in whom minimal invasive methods fail and for the curative treatment of malignant lesions.

Zusammenfassung

Moderne Schnittbildverfahren haben invasivere Methoden, wie die ERC und PTC in der Diagnostik der Choledocholithiasis, sowie von benignen und malignen Strikturen weitgehend abgelöst. Der direkte Zugang zum Gallengang aus diagnostischen Gründen ist lediglich noch für die Gewinnung von Material zur histologischen oder zytologischen Diagnostik notwendig. Seit Einführung der routinemäßigen intraoperativen Cholangiographie bzw. Choledochusrevision im Rahmen der laparoskopischen Cholezystektomie ist neuerlich ein Wechsel in der Behandlungsstrategie der Choledocholithiasis erfolgt. Die ERC hat hier ihren singulären Anspruch als wenig invasives Verfahren zur Therapie der Choledocholithiasis verloren, sofern gleichzeitig die Indikation zur Cholezystektomie besteht; sie ist lediglich für Patienten mit St.p. Cholezystektomie das Therapieverfahren der ersten Wahl geblieben. In der Therapie von Gallengangsläsionen, seien es Leckagen, benigne oder maligne Stenosen, haben sich wenig invasive Verfahren, allen voran die Endoskopie als Therapie der ersten Wahl durchgesetzt. Der Stellenwert der Chirurgie liegt hier in der Behandlung von Therapieversagern sowie in der kurativen Tumorchirurgie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335: 909–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf TE, Bhutani MS (2004) Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in diseases of the extrahepatic biliary system. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19: 243–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M, Toda N, Sasahira N, Nakai Y, Yamamoto N, Hirano K, Komatsu Y, Tada M, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Ohtomo K, Omata M (2005) Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography. Eur J Radiol 54: 271–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris HW, Davis BR, Vitale GC (2005) Cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: is surgery necessary? Surg Innov 12: 187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sgourakis G, Karaliotas K (2002) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study. Minerva Chir 57: 467–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351: 159–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson LK, O'Rourke NA, Martin IJ, Fielding GA, Cowen AE, Roberts RK, Kendall BJ, Kerlin P, Devereux BM (2005) Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 242: 188–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuschieri A, Croce E, Faggioni A, Jakimowicz J, Lacy A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Ribeiro VM, Toouli J, Visa J, Wayand W (1996) EAES ductal stone study. Preliminary findings of multi-center prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management. Surg Endosc 10: 1130–1135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lella F, Bagnolo F, Rebuffat C, Scalambra M, Bonassi U, Colombo E (2006) Use of the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called "rendezvous" technique, in cholecystocholedocholithiasis A valid method in cases with patient-related risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Surg Endosc

  • Kaffes AJ, Hourigan L, De Luca N, Byth K, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ (2005) Impact of endoscopic intervention in 100 patients with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak. Gastrointest Endosc 61: 269–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski A, Duex M, Lubienski K, Blietz J, Kauffmann GW, Helmberger T (2005) Interventions for benign biliary strictures. Radiologe 45: 1012–1019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zoepf T, Maldonado-Lopez EJ, Hilgard P, Dechene A, Malago M, Broelsch CE, Schlaak J, Gerken G (2005) Diagnosis of biliary strictures after liver transplantation: which is the best tool? World J Gastroenterol 11: 2945–2948

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costamagna G, Pandolci M, Mutignani M, Spada C, Perri V (2001) Long-term results of endoscopic management of postoperative bile duct strictures with increasing numbers of stents. Gastrointest Endosc 54: 162–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speer AG, Cotton PB, Russell RC, Mason RR, Hatfield AR, Leung JW, MacRae KD, Houghton J, Lennon CA (1987) Randomised trial of endoscopic versus percutaneous stent insertion in malignant obstructive jaundice. Lancet 2(8550): 57–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoefl R, Haefner M, Wrba F, Pfeffel F, Stain C, Poetzi R, Gangl A (1997) Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses. Scand J Gastroenterol 32: 363–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fritscher-Ravens A, Broering DC, Knoefel WT, Rogiers X, Swain P, Thonke F, Bobrowski C, Topalidis T, Soehendra N (2004) EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in potentially operable patients with negative brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol 99: 45–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szklaruk J, Tamm E, Charnsangavej C (2002) Preoperative imaging of biliary tract cancers. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 11: 865–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman ML, Sielaf TD (2003) A modern approach to malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 3: 187–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romaneehsen B, Otto G, Lohse AW, Bittinger F, Herber S, Oberholzer K, Pitton MB, Thelen M (2004) Diagnostic imaging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: preoperative evaluation of ERC, MRC and PTC in comparison with histopathology. Rofo 176: 1750–1758

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burmester E, Niehaus J, Leineweber T, Huetteroth T (2003) EUS-cholangio-drainage of the bile duct: report of 4 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 57: 246–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puspok A, Lomoschitz F, Dejaco C, Hejna M, Sautner T, Gangl A (2005) Endoscopic ultrasound guided therapy of benign and malignant biliary obstruction: a case series. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 1743–1747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortner ME, Caca K, Berr F, Liebetruth J, Mansmann U, Huster D, Voderholzer W, Schachschal G, Mossner J, Lochs H (2003) Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology 125: 1355–1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zoepf T, Jakobs R, Arnold JC, Apel D, Riemann JF (2005) Palliation of nonresectable bile duct cancer: improved survival after photodynamic therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 2426–2430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacFaul GR, Chapman RW (2005) Sclerosing cholangitis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 21: 348–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Angulo P, Pearce DH, Johnson CD, Henry JJ, LaRusso NF, Petersen BT, Lindor KD (2000) Magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with biliary disease: its role in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol 33: 520–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stiehl A, Rudolph G, Sauer P, Benz C, Stremmel W, Walker S, Theilmann L (1997) Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment and endoscopic dilation of major duct stenoses in primary sclerosing cholangitis. An 8-year prospective study. J Hepatol 26: 560–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya M, Petersen BT, Angulo P, Baron TH, Andrews JC, Gostout CJ, Lindor KD (2001) Balloon dilation compared to stenting of dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 96: 1059–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsioen CY, Vrouenraets SM, van Milligen de Wit AW, Sturm P, Tascilar M, Offerhaus GJ, Prins M, Huibregtse K, Tytgat GN (1999) Value of brush cytology for dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 31: 305–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boberg KM, Schrumpf E, Bergquist A, Broome U, Pares A, Remotti H, Schjolberg A, Spurkland A, Clausen OP (2000) Cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: K-ras mutations and Tp53 dysfunction are implicated in the neoplastic development. J Hepatol 32: 374–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubicka S, Kuhnel F, Flemming P, Hain B, Kezmic N, Rudolph KL, Manns M, Meier PN (2001) K-ras mutations in the bile of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut 48: 403–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Püspök.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Püspök, A. Gallengangsprobleme – durch technische Entwicklungen zu verändertem Patientenmanagement. Wien Med Wochenschr 156, 386–390 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-006-0313-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-006-0313-6

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation