Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in liver function tests after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low- and high-pressure pneumoperitoneum

  • original article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of pneumoperitoneum on liver function during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

This prospective study comprised a total of 165 patients, who were divided into two groups: The first group had low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (12 mm Hg; N = 78) and the second group had high-pressure pneumoperitoneum (14 mm Hg; N = 87). A detailed statistical analysis included sex, age, operation time, and liver function tests including total bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, fibrinogen, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which were obtained preoperatively and 24 h, 7 days, and 30 days postoperatively. The statistical hypotheses were tested with a t test, Mann–Whitney test, chi-square test, Friedman test, and Wilcoxon’s test.

Results

There was no statistical difference between the two groups considering age, gender, and operation time (p = 0.740, p = 0.255, and p = 0.480, respectively). There was also no statistical difference in the median values of bilirubin, AST, GGT, LDH, albumin, and fibrinogen between the two groups. There was a significant statistical difference between the two groups in the median values of ALT on the 30th postoperative day (p = 0.045). There was a statistical difference for all hematochemical parameters as a function of time, independent of the level of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).

Conclusion

There were no statistically significant differences in the values of parameters of structural damage to the liver between the two groups, but within the groups themselves. From this we conclude that both values of elevated IAP cause microstructural and functional damage to the liver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, et al. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1121–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lai H, Mo X, Yang Y, et al. Association between duration of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery and hepatic injury: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e104067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Richter S, Olinger A, Hildebrandt U, Menger MD, Vollmar B. Loss of physiologic hepatic blood flow control (“hepatic arterial buffer response”) during CO2-pneumoperitoneum in the rat. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(4):872–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh RK, Saini AM, Goel N, Bisht D, Seth A. Major laparoscopic surgery under regional anesthesia: a prospective feasibility study. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71(2):126–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirvonen EA, Nuutinen LS, Kauko M. Hemodynamic changes due to Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39(7):949–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sassa N, Hattori R, Yamamoto T, et al. Direct visualization of renal hemodynamics affected by carbon dioxide-induced pneumoperitoneum. Urology. 2009;73(2):311–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saber AA, Laraja RD, Nalbandian HI, Pablos-Mendez A, Hanna K. Changes in liver function tests after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: not so rare, not always ominous. Am Surg. 2000;66(7):699–702.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishizaki Y, Bandai Y, Shimonura K, Abe H, Ohtomo Y, Idezuki Y. Safe intraabdominal pressure of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery. Surgery. 1993;114(3):549–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blobner M, Bogdanski R, Kochs E, Henke J, Findeis A, Jelen-Esselborn S. Effects of intraabdominally insufflated carbon dioxide and elevated intraabdominal pressure on splanchnic circulation: an experimental study in pigs. Anesthesiology. 1998;89(2):475–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hasukic S. Postoperative changes in liver function tests. Randomized comparison of low- and high-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1451–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson PD, Withrington PG. Liver blood flow. Intrinsic and nervous control of liver blood flow. Gastroenterology. 1981;81(1):356–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeoung GA, Cho GS, Shin EJ, Lee MS, Kim HC, Song OP. Liver function alterations after laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer and its clinical significance. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:372–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan M, Xu FF, Peng JS, et al. Changes in the level of serum liver enzymes after laparoscopic surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:364–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rastko Zivic MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Z. Zagorac, R. Zivic, M. Milanovic, B. Vekic, B. Dakovic, Z. Bukumiric, and D. Radovanovic declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zagorac, Z., Zivic, R., Milanovic, M. et al. Changes in liver function tests after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low- and high-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Eur Surg 51, 61–65 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-019-0568-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-019-0568-y

Keywords

Navigation